Misconception, misinformation, misdirection and misplaced aggression–a case study of a murdered Macqueen’s Bustard

Reginald Victor, Kinnari Bhatt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Photographs of a ‘spy raptor’ killed while flying over the India-Pakistan border in Rajasthan were disseminated over the social media. The ‘raptor’ was a Macqueen’s Bustard, Chlamydotis macqueenii carrying a satellite transmitter assembly and a red leg ring with an inscription K34. The National Avian Research Centre (NARC), Abu Dhabi, has extensively studied the biology of C. macqueenii. The killed bustard was one of the captive-bred bustards participating in NARC’s monitoring of their migration. Inquiry showed that this bustard was shot in Afghanistan in 2014 and not in India in 2016 as reported. The report from Afghanistan described this bird as a Taliban drone fitted with a bomb vest. The Indian television channel broadcast this news and misinformed its viewers by calling this bird a spy sent over by Pakistan. The Afghanistan report misdirected this incident to blame the Taliban. The Indian television did the same to incriminate Pakistan. The misconceived labelling of a bird participating in a scientific study as a spy has led to misinformation and misdirection that can provoke international aggression. This paper argues that a Macqueen’s bustard contributing to scientific knowledge for conservation has been killed unnecessarily and appeals for an improvement in the knowledge of security agencies about birds carrying identification tags and tracking devices.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)183-191
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Studies
Volume74
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 4 2017

Fingerprint

Birds
Afghanistan
Pakistan
Taliban
bird
raptor
television
Television
India
Persian Gulf
social media
broadcast
aggression
biology
appeal
incident
news
conservation
migration
Labeling

Keywords

  • Macqueen’s Bustard
  • misconceptions
  • monitoring
  • press
  • spying

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Ecology
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Pollution
  • Computers in Earth Sciences

Cite this

@article{0f151bc398ee4a83b544f9a85426d8de,
title = "Misconception, misinformation, misdirection and misplaced aggression–a case study of a murdered Macqueen’s Bustard",
abstract = "Photographs of a ‘spy raptor’ killed while flying over the India-Pakistan border in Rajasthan were disseminated over the social media. The ‘raptor’ was a Macqueen’s Bustard, Chlamydotis macqueenii carrying a satellite transmitter assembly and a red leg ring with an inscription K34. The National Avian Research Centre (NARC), Abu Dhabi, has extensively studied the biology of C. macqueenii. The killed bustard was one of the captive-bred bustards participating in NARC’s monitoring of their migration. Inquiry showed that this bustard was shot in Afghanistan in 2014 and not in India in 2016 as reported. The report from Afghanistan described this bird as a Taliban drone fitted with a bomb vest. The Indian television channel broadcast this news and misinformed its viewers by calling this bird a spy sent over by Pakistan. The Afghanistan report misdirected this incident to blame the Taliban. The Indian television did the same to incriminate Pakistan. The misconceived labelling of a bird participating in a scientific study as a spy has led to misinformation and misdirection that can provoke international aggression. This paper argues that a Macqueen’s bustard contributing to scientific knowledge for conservation has been killed unnecessarily and appeals for an improvement in the knowledge of security agencies about birds carrying identification tags and tracking devices.",
keywords = "Macqueen’s Bustard, misconceptions, monitoring, press, spying",
author = "Reginald Victor and Kinnari Bhatt",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/00207233.2016.1269588",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "183--191",
journal = "International Journal of Environmental Studies",
issn = "0020-7233",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Misconception, misinformation, misdirection and misplaced aggression–a case study of a murdered Macqueen’s Bustard

AU - Victor, Reginald

AU - Bhatt, Kinnari

PY - 2017/3/4

Y1 - 2017/3/4

N2 - Photographs of a ‘spy raptor’ killed while flying over the India-Pakistan border in Rajasthan were disseminated over the social media. The ‘raptor’ was a Macqueen’s Bustard, Chlamydotis macqueenii carrying a satellite transmitter assembly and a red leg ring with an inscription K34. The National Avian Research Centre (NARC), Abu Dhabi, has extensively studied the biology of C. macqueenii. The killed bustard was one of the captive-bred bustards participating in NARC’s monitoring of their migration. Inquiry showed that this bustard was shot in Afghanistan in 2014 and not in India in 2016 as reported. The report from Afghanistan described this bird as a Taliban drone fitted with a bomb vest. The Indian television channel broadcast this news and misinformed its viewers by calling this bird a spy sent over by Pakistan. The Afghanistan report misdirected this incident to blame the Taliban. The Indian television did the same to incriminate Pakistan. The misconceived labelling of a bird participating in a scientific study as a spy has led to misinformation and misdirection that can provoke international aggression. This paper argues that a Macqueen’s bustard contributing to scientific knowledge for conservation has been killed unnecessarily and appeals for an improvement in the knowledge of security agencies about birds carrying identification tags and tracking devices.

AB - Photographs of a ‘spy raptor’ killed while flying over the India-Pakistan border in Rajasthan were disseminated over the social media. The ‘raptor’ was a Macqueen’s Bustard, Chlamydotis macqueenii carrying a satellite transmitter assembly and a red leg ring with an inscription K34. The National Avian Research Centre (NARC), Abu Dhabi, has extensively studied the biology of C. macqueenii. The killed bustard was one of the captive-bred bustards participating in NARC’s monitoring of their migration. Inquiry showed that this bustard was shot in Afghanistan in 2014 and not in India in 2016 as reported. The report from Afghanistan described this bird as a Taliban drone fitted with a bomb vest. The Indian television channel broadcast this news and misinformed its viewers by calling this bird a spy sent over by Pakistan. The Afghanistan report misdirected this incident to blame the Taliban. The Indian television did the same to incriminate Pakistan. The misconceived labelling of a bird participating in a scientific study as a spy has led to misinformation and misdirection that can provoke international aggression. This paper argues that a Macqueen’s bustard contributing to scientific knowledge for conservation has been killed unnecessarily and appeals for an improvement in the knowledge of security agencies about birds carrying identification tags and tracking devices.

KW - Macqueen’s Bustard

KW - misconceptions

KW - monitoring

KW - press

KW - spying

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012261826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85012261826&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00207233.2016.1269588

DO - 10.1080/00207233.2016.1269588

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 183

EP - 191

JO - International Journal of Environmental Studies

JF - International Journal of Environmental Studies

SN - 0020-7233

IS - 2

ER -