Mentored simulation training improves procedural skills in cardiac catheterization: A randomized, controlled pilot study

Akshay Bagai, Sean O'Brien, Hatim Al Lawati, Prateek Goyal, Warren Ball, Teodor Grantcharov, Neil Fam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Despite valuable supplemental training resources for surgical skill acquisition, utility of virtual reality simulators to improve skills relevant to performing cardiac catheterization has not been evaluated. Methods and Results: Post baseline cardiac catheterization performance assessment, 27 cardiology trainees were randomized to either mentored training on a virtual reality simulator (n=12) or no simulator training (control; n=15). Cardiac catheterization performance was reassessed 1 week post baseline assessment. Performance scores at 1 week were compared with baseline within each group, and change in score from baseline to 1 week was compared between groups. Linear regression modeling was performed to assess the effect of simulator training as a function of baseline performance. Technical performance improved postintervention in the simulator group (24 versus 18; P=0.008) and changed marginally in the control group (20 versus 18; P=0.054). Improvement in technical performance was greater in the simulator group (6 versus 1; P=0.04). Global performance improved postintervention in both groups (simulator, 24 versus 17, P=0.01; control, 20 versus 18, P=0.02), with a trend toward greater improvement in the simulator group (5 versus 2; P=0.11). Lower scores at baseline were associated with larger differences in postintervention scores between the simulator and control groups (technical performance, P=0.0006; global performance, P<0.0001). Conclusions: Skills required to perform cardiac catheterization can be learned via mentored simulation training and are transferable to actual procedures in the catheterization laboratory. Less proficient operators derive greater benefit from simulator training than more proficient operators.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)672-679
Number of pages8
JournalCirculation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume5
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

Cardiac Catheterization
Control Groups
Cardiology
Catheterization
Linear Models
Simulation Training

Keywords

  • Angiography
  • Cardiac catheterization
  • Medical education
  • Simulators
  • Virtual reality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Mentored simulation training improves procedural skills in cardiac catheterization : A randomized, controlled pilot study. / Bagai, Akshay; O'Brien, Sean; Al Lawati, Hatim; Goyal, Prateek; Ball, Warren; Grantcharov, Teodor; Fam, Neil.

In: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, Vol. 5, No. 5, 10.2012, p. 672-679.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bagai, Akshay ; O'Brien, Sean ; Al Lawati, Hatim ; Goyal, Prateek ; Ball, Warren ; Grantcharov, Teodor ; Fam, Neil. / Mentored simulation training improves procedural skills in cardiac catheterization : A randomized, controlled pilot study. In: Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2012 ; Vol. 5, No. 5. pp. 672-679.
@article{c39c11f4359d4236808d7187b2a53147,
title = "Mentored simulation training improves procedural skills in cardiac catheterization: A randomized, controlled pilot study",
abstract = "Background: Despite valuable supplemental training resources for surgical skill acquisition, utility of virtual reality simulators to improve skills relevant to performing cardiac catheterization has not been evaluated. Methods and Results: Post baseline cardiac catheterization performance assessment, 27 cardiology trainees were randomized to either mentored training on a virtual reality simulator (n=12) or no simulator training (control; n=15). Cardiac catheterization performance was reassessed 1 week post baseline assessment. Performance scores at 1 week were compared with baseline within each group, and change in score from baseline to 1 week was compared between groups. Linear regression modeling was performed to assess the effect of simulator training as a function of baseline performance. Technical performance improved postintervention in the simulator group (24 versus 18; P=0.008) and changed marginally in the control group (20 versus 18; P=0.054). Improvement in technical performance was greater in the simulator group (6 versus 1; P=0.04). Global performance improved postintervention in both groups (simulator, 24 versus 17, P=0.01; control, 20 versus 18, P=0.02), with a trend toward greater improvement in the simulator group (5 versus 2; P=0.11). Lower scores at baseline were associated with larger differences in postintervention scores between the simulator and control groups (technical performance, P=0.0006; global performance, P<0.0001). Conclusions: Skills required to perform cardiac catheterization can be learned via mentored simulation training and are transferable to actual procedures in the catheterization laboratory. Less proficient operators derive greater benefit from simulator training than more proficient operators.",
keywords = "Angiography, Cardiac catheterization, Medical education, Simulators, Virtual reality",
author = "Akshay Bagai and Sean O'Brien and {Al Lawati}, Hatim and Prateek Goyal and Warren Ball and Teodor Grantcharov and Neil Fam",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.970772",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "672--679",
journal = "Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions",
issn = "1941-7640",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mentored simulation training improves procedural skills in cardiac catheterization

T2 - A randomized, controlled pilot study

AU - Bagai, Akshay

AU - O'Brien, Sean

AU - Al Lawati, Hatim

AU - Goyal, Prateek

AU - Ball, Warren

AU - Grantcharov, Teodor

AU - Fam, Neil

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - Background: Despite valuable supplemental training resources for surgical skill acquisition, utility of virtual reality simulators to improve skills relevant to performing cardiac catheterization has not been evaluated. Methods and Results: Post baseline cardiac catheterization performance assessment, 27 cardiology trainees were randomized to either mentored training on a virtual reality simulator (n=12) or no simulator training (control; n=15). Cardiac catheterization performance was reassessed 1 week post baseline assessment. Performance scores at 1 week were compared with baseline within each group, and change in score from baseline to 1 week was compared between groups. Linear regression modeling was performed to assess the effect of simulator training as a function of baseline performance. Technical performance improved postintervention in the simulator group (24 versus 18; P=0.008) and changed marginally in the control group (20 versus 18; P=0.054). Improvement in technical performance was greater in the simulator group (6 versus 1; P=0.04). Global performance improved postintervention in both groups (simulator, 24 versus 17, P=0.01; control, 20 versus 18, P=0.02), with a trend toward greater improvement in the simulator group (5 versus 2; P=0.11). Lower scores at baseline were associated with larger differences in postintervention scores between the simulator and control groups (technical performance, P=0.0006; global performance, P<0.0001). Conclusions: Skills required to perform cardiac catheterization can be learned via mentored simulation training and are transferable to actual procedures in the catheterization laboratory. Less proficient operators derive greater benefit from simulator training than more proficient operators.

AB - Background: Despite valuable supplemental training resources for surgical skill acquisition, utility of virtual reality simulators to improve skills relevant to performing cardiac catheterization has not been evaluated. Methods and Results: Post baseline cardiac catheterization performance assessment, 27 cardiology trainees were randomized to either mentored training on a virtual reality simulator (n=12) or no simulator training (control; n=15). Cardiac catheterization performance was reassessed 1 week post baseline assessment. Performance scores at 1 week were compared with baseline within each group, and change in score from baseline to 1 week was compared between groups. Linear regression modeling was performed to assess the effect of simulator training as a function of baseline performance. Technical performance improved postintervention in the simulator group (24 versus 18; P=0.008) and changed marginally in the control group (20 versus 18; P=0.054). Improvement in technical performance was greater in the simulator group (6 versus 1; P=0.04). Global performance improved postintervention in both groups (simulator, 24 versus 17, P=0.01; control, 20 versus 18, P=0.02), with a trend toward greater improvement in the simulator group (5 versus 2; P=0.11). Lower scores at baseline were associated with larger differences in postintervention scores between the simulator and control groups (technical performance, P=0.0006; global performance, P<0.0001). Conclusions: Skills required to perform cardiac catheterization can be learned via mentored simulation training and are transferable to actual procedures in the catheterization laboratory. Less proficient operators derive greater benefit from simulator training than more proficient operators.

KW - Angiography

KW - Cardiac catheterization

KW - Medical education

KW - Simulators

KW - Virtual reality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84868668513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84868668513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.970772

DO - 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.970772

M3 - Article

C2 - 23048053

AN - SCOPUS:84868668513

VL - 5

SP - 672

EP - 679

JO - Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions

JF - Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions

SN - 1941-7640

IS - 5

ER -