Laparoscopic splenectomy using ligasure

Norman Oneil Machado, Nayil A. Kindy, Pradeep J. Chopra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has become the standard approach for most splenectomy cases. Bleeding is the main complication and cause for conversion. We present our experience with the LigaSure and discuss its advantage as a vessel sealing system in achieving safe vascular control. Method: Over a 3-year period, we performed 12 consecutive LS using LigaSure at a single center. A literature review of all the patients who had undergone laparoscopic splenectomy with of the LigaSure to achieve vascular control at the hilum was carried out, assessing its advantages and outcome. Results: Twelve LS were performed. Eleven of these patients had ITP, and one patient had sickle cell disease. The mean blood loss was 70mL (range, 50 to 460), and operating time was 126 minutes (range, 110 to 240). Two postoperative complications occurred: portal vein thrombosis in one case and subphrenic collection in the other. The literature review revealed 8 studies with 231 cases in which the LigaSure was used to perform laparoscopic splenectomy. A significant reduction in operating time (average 102 minutes) and intraabdominal blood loss (66mL) was observed with the LigaSure compared with endostaplers. Conclusion: The use of LigaSure and the semilateral position results in a gain of time and safety in addition to low intraoperative bleeding, need for transfusion, minimal complications and a low conversion rate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)547-552
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2011

Fingerprint

Splenectomy
Blood Vessels
Hemorrhage
Inosine Triphosphate
Sickle Cell Anemia
Portal Vein
Thrombosis
Safety

Keywords

  • Bleeding
  • Laparoscopic splenectomy
  • Ligasure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Laparoscopic splenectomy using ligasure. / Machado, Norman Oneil; Kindy, Nayil A.; Chopra, Pradeep J.

In: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, Vol. 14, No. 4, 10.2011, p. 547-552.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Machado, Norman Oneil ; Kindy, Nayil A. ; Chopra, Pradeep J. / Laparoscopic splenectomy using ligasure. In: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2011 ; Vol. 14, No. 4. pp. 547-552.
@article{109841923ad546d186a50fe844d89976,
title = "Laparoscopic splenectomy using ligasure",
abstract = "Background: Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has become the standard approach for most splenectomy cases. Bleeding is the main complication and cause for conversion. We present our experience with the LigaSure and discuss its advantage as a vessel sealing system in achieving safe vascular control. Method: Over a 3-year period, we performed 12 consecutive LS using LigaSure at a single center. A literature review of all the patients who had undergone laparoscopic splenectomy with of the LigaSure to achieve vascular control at the hilum was carried out, assessing its advantages and outcome. Results: Twelve LS were performed. Eleven of these patients had ITP, and one patient had sickle cell disease. The mean blood loss was 70mL (range, 50 to 460), and operating time was 126 minutes (range, 110 to 240). Two postoperative complications occurred: portal vein thrombosis in one case and subphrenic collection in the other. The literature review revealed 8 studies with 231 cases in which the LigaSure was used to perform laparoscopic splenectomy. A significant reduction in operating time (average 102 minutes) and intraabdominal blood loss (66mL) was observed with the LigaSure compared with endostaplers. Conclusion: The use of LigaSure and the semilateral position results in a gain of time and safety in addition to low intraoperative bleeding, need for transfusion, minimal complications and a low conversion rate.",
keywords = "Bleeding, Laparoscopic splenectomy, Ligasure",
author = "Machado, {Norman Oneil} and Kindy, {Nayil A.} and Chopra, {Pradeep J.}",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
doi = "10.4293/108680810X12924466008286",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "547--552",
journal = "Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons",
issn = "1086-8089",
publisher = "Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laparoscopic splenectomy using ligasure

AU - Machado, Norman Oneil

AU - Kindy, Nayil A.

AU - Chopra, Pradeep J.

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - Background: Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has become the standard approach for most splenectomy cases. Bleeding is the main complication and cause for conversion. We present our experience with the LigaSure and discuss its advantage as a vessel sealing system in achieving safe vascular control. Method: Over a 3-year period, we performed 12 consecutive LS using LigaSure at a single center. A literature review of all the patients who had undergone laparoscopic splenectomy with of the LigaSure to achieve vascular control at the hilum was carried out, assessing its advantages and outcome. Results: Twelve LS were performed. Eleven of these patients had ITP, and one patient had sickle cell disease. The mean blood loss was 70mL (range, 50 to 460), and operating time was 126 minutes (range, 110 to 240). Two postoperative complications occurred: portal vein thrombosis in one case and subphrenic collection in the other. The literature review revealed 8 studies with 231 cases in which the LigaSure was used to perform laparoscopic splenectomy. A significant reduction in operating time (average 102 minutes) and intraabdominal blood loss (66mL) was observed with the LigaSure compared with endostaplers. Conclusion: The use of LigaSure and the semilateral position results in a gain of time and safety in addition to low intraoperative bleeding, need for transfusion, minimal complications and a low conversion rate.

AB - Background: Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) has become the standard approach for most splenectomy cases. Bleeding is the main complication and cause for conversion. We present our experience with the LigaSure and discuss its advantage as a vessel sealing system in achieving safe vascular control. Method: Over a 3-year period, we performed 12 consecutive LS using LigaSure at a single center. A literature review of all the patients who had undergone laparoscopic splenectomy with of the LigaSure to achieve vascular control at the hilum was carried out, assessing its advantages and outcome. Results: Twelve LS were performed. Eleven of these patients had ITP, and one patient had sickle cell disease. The mean blood loss was 70mL (range, 50 to 460), and operating time was 126 minutes (range, 110 to 240). Two postoperative complications occurred: portal vein thrombosis in one case and subphrenic collection in the other. The literature review revealed 8 studies with 231 cases in which the LigaSure was used to perform laparoscopic splenectomy. A significant reduction in operating time (average 102 minutes) and intraabdominal blood loss (66mL) was observed with the LigaSure compared with endostaplers. Conclusion: The use of LigaSure and the semilateral position results in a gain of time and safety in addition to low intraoperative bleeding, need for transfusion, minimal complications and a low conversion rate.

KW - Bleeding

KW - Laparoscopic splenectomy

KW - Ligasure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957956566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79957956566&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4293/108680810X12924466008286

DO - 10.4293/108680810X12924466008286

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 547

EP - 552

JO - Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

JF - Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

SN - 1086-8089

IS - 4

ER -