Joint audit, political connections and cost of debt capital

Ahmed Al-Hadi, Ahsan Habib, Khamis Al-Yahyaee, Baban Eulaiwi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigate the association between joint audit and cost of debt for a sample of non-financial, publicly listed firms from the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Although the conventional wisdom suggests that “two heads are better than one”, empirical evidence on the beneficial impact of joint audit has not been convincingly documented. We attempt to shed further insights into this debate, using data from the GCC countries. We document a significantly negative effect of joint audit on cost of debt in the GCC countries. This effect is more pronounced in cases where at least one of the joint audit firms is a Big 4 auditor. We then investigate whether political connections with royal families moderate the association between joint audit and cost of debt. Our results suggest that the beneficial effects of joint audits, in terms of a lower cost of debt, are greater in firms with such political connections.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)249-270
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Journal of Auditing
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1 2017

Fingerprint

Cost of debt
Political connections
Political costs
Audit
Gulf Cooperation Council
Empirical evidence
Wisdom
Auditors
Audit firms
Big 4

Keywords

  • Big 4 auditor
  • cost of debt
  • Gulf Cooperation Council
  • joint audit
  • royal family

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

Joint audit, political connections and cost of debt capital. / Al-Hadi, Ahmed; Habib, Ahsan; Al-Yahyaee, Khamis; Eulaiwi, Baban.

In: International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 21, No. 3, 01.11.2017, p. 249-270.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Al-Hadi, Ahmed ; Habib, Ahsan ; Al-Yahyaee, Khamis ; Eulaiwi, Baban. / Joint audit, political connections and cost of debt capital. In: International Journal of Auditing. 2017 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 249-270.
@article{123629b8f1074d038e56959c416b7b12,
title = "Joint audit, political connections and cost of debt capital",
abstract = "We investigate the association between joint audit and cost of debt for a sample of non-financial, publicly listed firms from the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Although the conventional wisdom suggests that “two heads are better than one”, empirical evidence on the beneficial impact of joint audit has not been convincingly documented. We attempt to shed further insights into this debate, using data from the GCC countries. We document a significantly negative effect of joint audit on cost of debt in the GCC countries. This effect is more pronounced in cases where at least one of the joint audit firms is a Big 4 auditor. We then investigate whether political connections with royal families moderate the association between joint audit and cost of debt. Our results suggest that the beneficial effects of joint audits, in terms of a lower cost of debt, are greater in firms with such political connections.",
keywords = "Big 4 auditor, cost of debt, Gulf Cooperation Council, joint audit, royal family",
author = "Ahmed Al-Hadi and Ahsan Habib and Khamis Al-Yahyaee and Baban Eulaiwi",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ijau.12092",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "249--270",
journal = "International Journal of Auditing",
issn = "1090-6738",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Joint audit, political connections and cost of debt capital

AU - Al-Hadi, Ahmed

AU - Habib, Ahsan

AU - Al-Yahyaee, Khamis

AU - Eulaiwi, Baban

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - We investigate the association between joint audit and cost of debt for a sample of non-financial, publicly listed firms from the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Although the conventional wisdom suggests that “two heads are better than one”, empirical evidence on the beneficial impact of joint audit has not been convincingly documented. We attempt to shed further insights into this debate, using data from the GCC countries. We document a significantly negative effect of joint audit on cost of debt in the GCC countries. This effect is more pronounced in cases where at least one of the joint audit firms is a Big 4 auditor. We then investigate whether political connections with royal families moderate the association between joint audit and cost of debt. Our results suggest that the beneficial effects of joint audits, in terms of a lower cost of debt, are greater in firms with such political connections.

AB - We investigate the association between joint audit and cost of debt for a sample of non-financial, publicly listed firms from the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Although the conventional wisdom suggests that “two heads are better than one”, empirical evidence on the beneficial impact of joint audit has not been convincingly documented. We attempt to shed further insights into this debate, using data from the GCC countries. We document a significantly negative effect of joint audit on cost of debt in the GCC countries. This effect is more pronounced in cases where at least one of the joint audit firms is a Big 4 auditor. We then investigate whether political connections with royal families moderate the association between joint audit and cost of debt. Our results suggest that the beneficial effects of joint audits, in terms of a lower cost of debt, are greater in firms with such political connections.

KW - Big 4 auditor

KW - cost of debt

KW - Gulf Cooperation Council

KW - joint audit

KW - royal family

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017526125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017526125&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ijau.12092

DO - 10.1111/ijau.12092

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 249

EP - 270

JO - International Journal of Auditing

JF - International Journal of Auditing

SN - 1090-6738

IS - 3

ER -