Investigation of formation damage by Deep Eutectic Solvents as new EOR agents

A. Mohsenzadeh, Y. Al-Wahaibi, R. Al-Hajri, B. Jibril, S. Joshi, B. Pracejus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Chemical injection into oil reservoirs is considered as an effective enhanced oil recovery (EOR) method. Although some of the chemicals improve oil recovery, they may have side effects on reservoirs such as formation damage due to fluids incompatibility or chemical interactions with reservoir rocks and fluids. Since our previous work indicated promising results from Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs; DES1 - choline chloride:glycerol=1:2 and DES2 - choline chloride:urea=1:2) on enhanced heavy oil recovery, we now examine the possible effects of these DESs on sandstone formation damage.Core flooding tests were performed at reservoir pressure and different temperatures to measure possible permeability changes by DESs injection. To understand the mechanisms of formation damage, different measurements were performed: Critical injection rate beyond which fines migration will take place, water shock effects on formation damage, dry core weight measurements before and after each core flooding tests, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and computed tomography (CT) scanning studies of fresh and treated core samples.Permeability measurements by core flooding tests showed that the water shock phenomenon caused severe damage (65% reduction in absolute permeability) when distilled water was injected after brine flooding. Both DESs showed positive effect on reducing the water shock damages at different temperatures, where DES2 was much more effective when compared with DES1. Core weight measurements confirmed that whenever permeability damages were higher, the amount of core weight increase was also high. Moreover, results of SEM and quantitative XRD showed that precipitation and deposition inside pores are the main sources of formation damage. In addition, CT-scanning images provided good comparisons between fresh and damaged cores. We observed that using DESs showed that despite the DES[U+05F3]s solutions role in preventing severe water shock damage and stabilizing the clays, there was still some formation damage caused by re-crystallization and precipitation processes reducing the permeability of the core samples.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)130-136
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
Volume129
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 1 2015

Fingerprint

enhanced oil recovery
Eutectics
Recovery
damage
Core samples
Water
Weighing
Tomography
permeability
flooding
Scanning
X ray diffraction
Scanning electron microscopy
Fluids
Sandstone
Glycerol
Urea
tomography
Clay
water

Keywords

  • Core flooding
  • Deep Eutectic Solvents
  • Formation damage
  • Permeability changes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Fuel Technology

Cite this

Investigation of formation damage by Deep Eutectic Solvents as new EOR agents. / Mohsenzadeh, A.; Al-Wahaibi, Y.; Al-Hajri, R.; Jibril, B.; Joshi, S.; Pracejus, B.

In: Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Vol. 129, 01.05.2015, p. 130-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5d7829059783463c86f227d5396fb4fe,
title = "Investigation of formation damage by Deep Eutectic Solvents as new EOR agents",
abstract = "Chemical injection into oil reservoirs is considered as an effective enhanced oil recovery (EOR) method. Although some of the chemicals improve oil recovery, they may have side effects on reservoirs such as formation damage due to fluids incompatibility or chemical interactions with reservoir rocks and fluids. Since our previous work indicated promising results from Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs; DES1 - choline chloride:glycerol=1:2 and DES2 - choline chloride:urea=1:2) on enhanced heavy oil recovery, we now examine the possible effects of these DESs on sandstone formation damage.Core flooding tests were performed at reservoir pressure and different temperatures to measure possible permeability changes by DESs injection. To understand the mechanisms of formation damage, different measurements were performed: Critical injection rate beyond which fines migration will take place, water shock effects on formation damage, dry core weight measurements before and after each core flooding tests, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and computed tomography (CT) scanning studies of fresh and treated core samples.Permeability measurements by core flooding tests showed that the water shock phenomenon caused severe damage (65{\%} reduction in absolute permeability) when distilled water was injected after brine flooding. Both DESs showed positive effect on reducing the water shock damages at different temperatures, where DES2 was much more effective when compared with DES1. Core weight measurements confirmed that whenever permeability damages were higher, the amount of core weight increase was also high. Moreover, results of SEM and quantitative XRD showed that precipitation and deposition inside pores are the main sources of formation damage. In addition, CT-scanning images provided good comparisons between fresh and damaged cores. We observed that using DESs showed that despite the DES[U+05F3]s solutions role in preventing severe water shock damage and stabilizing the clays, there was still some formation damage caused by re-crystallization and precipitation processes reducing the permeability of the core samples.",
keywords = "Core flooding, Deep Eutectic Solvents, Formation damage, Permeability changes",
author = "A. Mohsenzadeh and Y. Al-Wahaibi and R. Al-Hajri and B. Jibril and S. Joshi and B. Pracejus",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.petrol.2015.02.035",
language = "English",
volume = "129",
pages = "130--136",
journal = "Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering",
issn = "0920-4105",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigation of formation damage by Deep Eutectic Solvents as new EOR agents

AU - Mohsenzadeh, A.

AU - Al-Wahaibi, Y.

AU - Al-Hajri, R.

AU - Jibril, B.

AU - Joshi, S.

AU - Pracejus, B.

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Chemical injection into oil reservoirs is considered as an effective enhanced oil recovery (EOR) method. Although some of the chemicals improve oil recovery, they may have side effects on reservoirs such as formation damage due to fluids incompatibility or chemical interactions with reservoir rocks and fluids. Since our previous work indicated promising results from Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs; DES1 - choline chloride:glycerol=1:2 and DES2 - choline chloride:urea=1:2) on enhanced heavy oil recovery, we now examine the possible effects of these DESs on sandstone formation damage.Core flooding tests were performed at reservoir pressure and different temperatures to measure possible permeability changes by DESs injection. To understand the mechanisms of formation damage, different measurements were performed: Critical injection rate beyond which fines migration will take place, water shock effects on formation damage, dry core weight measurements before and after each core flooding tests, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and computed tomography (CT) scanning studies of fresh and treated core samples.Permeability measurements by core flooding tests showed that the water shock phenomenon caused severe damage (65% reduction in absolute permeability) when distilled water was injected after brine flooding. Both DESs showed positive effect on reducing the water shock damages at different temperatures, where DES2 was much more effective when compared with DES1. Core weight measurements confirmed that whenever permeability damages were higher, the amount of core weight increase was also high. Moreover, results of SEM and quantitative XRD showed that precipitation and deposition inside pores are the main sources of formation damage. In addition, CT-scanning images provided good comparisons between fresh and damaged cores. We observed that using DESs showed that despite the DES[U+05F3]s solutions role in preventing severe water shock damage and stabilizing the clays, there was still some formation damage caused by re-crystallization and precipitation processes reducing the permeability of the core samples.

AB - Chemical injection into oil reservoirs is considered as an effective enhanced oil recovery (EOR) method. Although some of the chemicals improve oil recovery, they may have side effects on reservoirs such as formation damage due to fluids incompatibility or chemical interactions with reservoir rocks and fluids. Since our previous work indicated promising results from Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs; DES1 - choline chloride:glycerol=1:2 and DES2 - choline chloride:urea=1:2) on enhanced heavy oil recovery, we now examine the possible effects of these DESs on sandstone formation damage.Core flooding tests were performed at reservoir pressure and different temperatures to measure possible permeability changes by DESs injection. To understand the mechanisms of formation damage, different measurements were performed: Critical injection rate beyond which fines migration will take place, water shock effects on formation damage, dry core weight measurements before and after each core flooding tests, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and computed tomography (CT) scanning studies of fresh and treated core samples.Permeability measurements by core flooding tests showed that the water shock phenomenon caused severe damage (65% reduction in absolute permeability) when distilled water was injected after brine flooding. Both DESs showed positive effect on reducing the water shock damages at different temperatures, where DES2 was much more effective when compared with DES1. Core weight measurements confirmed that whenever permeability damages were higher, the amount of core weight increase was also high. Moreover, results of SEM and quantitative XRD showed that precipitation and deposition inside pores are the main sources of formation damage. In addition, CT-scanning images provided good comparisons between fresh and damaged cores. We observed that using DESs showed that despite the DES[U+05F3]s solutions role in preventing severe water shock damage and stabilizing the clays, there was still some formation damage caused by re-crystallization and precipitation processes reducing the permeability of the core samples.

KW - Core flooding

KW - Deep Eutectic Solvents

KW - Formation damage

KW - Permeability changes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939981017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84939981017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.petrol.2015.02.035

DO - 10.1016/j.petrol.2015.02.035

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84939981017

VL - 129

SP - 130

EP - 136

JO - Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering

JF - Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering

SN - 0920-4105

ER -