Implications of interface management for modularity degree

A. H M Shamsuzzoha, Yohanes Kristianto, Petri Helo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to demonstrate modularity degree in terms of interfaces and innovation. Design/methodology/approachThe research objective is achieved through a modeling approach for deciding modular architecture and its implementation regarding unique components and product innovation. A case example is presented to elaborate on the concept of modularity degree and provide an option for choosing the best module from different alternatives. FindingsThe presented approach can be considered a product design strategy, in which loose coupling is achieved through standardized component interfaces. Loosely coupled component interfacing is a prerequisite for developing mass customized products. There needs to be a decision support system to formulate the interfacing in order to achieve maximum benefits. This is illustrated in this paper. Research limitations/implicationsThe modeling strategy for measuring the modularity level is formulated theoretically. This approach needs to be validated through an empirical study in order to generalize its findings. Practical implicationsIn the industrial arena there is a research gap in identifying and measuring the modularity level, which is formulated in the presented approach. It is hoped that this approach will contribute to filling this research gap in the business environment, which would further benefit managers of firms in their corresponding production processes. Originality/valueThe unique contribution of this modeling approach is articulated through analyzing product architecture, with a view to interpreting the component interfaces in a more productive way. This formulation triggers the decision-making process in complex product development processes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6-24
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Modelling in Management
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Modularity
Interface management
Modeling
Module
Design methodology
Product development process
Empirical study
Production process
Product architecture
Decision-making process
Innovation
Business environment
Product design
Managers
Loose coupling
Decision support systems
Trigger
Complex product
Product innovation

Keywords

  • Component interface
  • Decision making
  • Decision-making process
  • Innovation
  • Product design
  • Product development
  • Unique component

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Implications of interface management for modularity degree. / Shamsuzzoha, A. H M; Kristianto, Yohanes; Helo, Petri.

In: Journal of Modelling in Management, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 6-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shamsuzzoha, A. H M ; Kristianto, Yohanes ; Helo, Petri. / Implications of interface management for modularity degree. In: Journal of Modelling in Management. 2013 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 6-24.
@article{8ce8f7aa0a3f4653a69f7b84edfa2506,
title = "Implications of interface management for modularity degree",
abstract = "PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to demonstrate modularity degree in terms of interfaces and innovation. Design/methodology/approachThe research objective is achieved through a modeling approach for deciding modular architecture and its implementation regarding unique components and product innovation. A case example is presented to elaborate on the concept of modularity degree and provide an option for choosing the best module from different alternatives. FindingsThe presented approach can be considered a product design strategy, in which loose coupling is achieved through standardized component interfaces. Loosely coupled component interfacing is a prerequisite for developing mass customized products. There needs to be a decision support system to formulate the interfacing in order to achieve maximum benefits. This is illustrated in this paper. Research limitations/implicationsThe modeling strategy for measuring the modularity level is formulated theoretically. This approach needs to be validated through an empirical study in order to generalize its findings. Practical implicationsIn the industrial arena there is a research gap in identifying and measuring the modularity level, which is formulated in the presented approach. It is hoped that this approach will contribute to filling this research gap in the business environment, which would further benefit managers of firms in their corresponding production processes. Originality/valueThe unique contribution of this modeling approach is articulated through analyzing product architecture, with a view to interpreting the component interfaces in a more productive way. This formulation triggers the decision-making process in complex product development processes.",
keywords = "Component interface, Decision making, Decision-making process, Innovation, Product design, Product development, Unique component",
author = "Shamsuzzoha, {A. H M} and Yohanes Kristianto and Petri Helo",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/17465661311311950",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "6--24",
journal = "Journal of Modelling in Management",
issn = "1746-5664",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implications of interface management for modularity degree

AU - Shamsuzzoha, A. H M

AU - Kristianto, Yohanes

AU - Helo, Petri

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to demonstrate modularity degree in terms of interfaces and innovation. Design/methodology/approachThe research objective is achieved through a modeling approach for deciding modular architecture and its implementation regarding unique components and product innovation. A case example is presented to elaborate on the concept of modularity degree and provide an option for choosing the best module from different alternatives. FindingsThe presented approach can be considered a product design strategy, in which loose coupling is achieved through standardized component interfaces. Loosely coupled component interfacing is a prerequisite for developing mass customized products. There needs to be a decision support system to formulate the interfacing in order to achieve maximum benefits. This is illustrated in this paper. Research limitations/implicationsThe modeling strategy for measuring the modularity level is formulated theoretically. This approach needs to be validated through an empirical study in order to generalize its findings. Practical implicationsIn the industrial arena there is a research gap in identifying and measuring the modularity level, which is formulated in the presented approach. It is hoped that this approach will contribute to filling this research gap in the business environment, which would further benefit managers of firms in their corresponding production processes. Originality/valueThe unique contribution of this modeling approach is articulated through analyzing product architecture, with a view to interpreting the component interfaces in a more productive way. This formulation triggers the decision-making process in complex product development processes.

AB - PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to demonstrate modularity degree in terms of interfaces and innovation. Design/methodology/approachThe research objective is achieved through a modeling approach for deciding modular architecture and its implementation regarding unique components and product innovation. A case example is presented to elaborate on the concept of modularity degree and provide an option for choosing the best module from different alternatives. FindingsThe presented approach can be considered a product design strategy, in which loose coupling is achieved through standardized component interfaces. Loosely coupled component interfacing is a prerequisite for developing mass customized products. There needs to be a decision support system to formulate the interfacing in order to achieve maximum benefits. This is illustrated in this paper. Research limitations/implicationsThe modeling strategy for measuring the modularity level is formulated theoretically. This approach needs to be validated through an empirical study in order to generalize its findings. Practical implicationsIn the industrial arena there is a research gap in identifying and measuring the modularity level, which is formulated in the presented approach. It is hoped that this approach will contribute to filling this research gap in the business environment, which would further benefit managers of firms in their corresponding production processes. Originality/valueThe unique contribution of this modeling approach is articulated through analyzing product architecture, with a view to interpreting the component interfaces in a more productive way. This formulation triggers the decision-making process in complex product development processes.

KW - Component interface

KW - Decision making

KW - Decision-making process

KW - Innovation

KW - Product design

KW - Product development

KW - Unique component

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954507084&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954507084&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/17465661311311950

DO - 10.1108/17465661311311950

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 6

EP - 24

JO - Journal of Modelling in Management

JF - Journal of Modelling in Management

SN - 1746-5664

IS - 1

ER -