Habitual reading biases in the allocation of study time

Robert Ariel, Ibrahim S. Al-Harthy, Christopher A. Was, John Dunlosky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Item order can bias learners' study decisions and undermine the use of more effective allocation strategies, such as allocating study time to items in one's region of proximal learning. In two experiments, we evaluated whether the influence of item order on study decisions reflects habitual responding based on a reading bias. We manipulated the order in which relatively easy, moderately difficult, and difficult items were presented from left to right on a computer screen and examined selection preference as a function of item order and item difficulty. Experiment 1a was conducted with native Arabic readers and in Arabic, and Experiment 1b was conducted with native English readers and in English. Students from both cultures prioritized items for study in the reading order of their native language: Arabic readers selected items for study in a right-to-left fashion, whereas English readers largely selected items from left to right. In Experiment 2, native English readers completed the same task as participants in Experiment 1b, but for some participants, lines of text were rotated upside down to encourage them to read from right to left. Participants who read upside-down text were more likely to first select items on the right side of an array than were participants who studied right-side-up text. These results indicate that reading habits can bias learners' study decisions and can undermine agenda-based regulation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1015-1021
Number of pages7
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume18
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2011

Fingerprint

Reading
Habits
Language
Learning
Students
Habitual
Experiment
Reader

Keywords

  • Metacognition
  • Self-regulated study

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Habitual reading biases in the allocation of study time. / Ariel, Robert; Al-Harthy, Ibrahim S.; Was, Christopher A.; Dunlosky, John.

In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 18, No. 5, 10.2011, p. 1015-1021.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ariel, Robert ; Al-Harthy, Ibrahim S. ; Was, Christopher A. ; Dunlosky, John. / Habitual reading biases in the allocation of study time. In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2011 ; Vol. 18, No. 5. pp. 1015-1021.
@article{6a5426f5e3c94af29daf317153a4138e,
title = "Habitual reading biases in the allocation of study time",
abstract = "Item order can bias learners' study decisions and undermine the use of more effective allocation strategies, such as allocating study time to items in one's region of proximal learning. In two experiments, we evaluated whether the influence of item order on study decisions reflects habitual responding based on a reading bias. We manipulated the order in which relatively easy, moderately difficult, and difficult items were presented from left to right on a computer screen and examined selection preference as a function of item order and item difficulty. Experiment 1a was conducted with native Arabic readers and in Arabic, and Experiment 1b was conducted with native English readers and in English. Students from both cultures prioritized items for study in the reading order of their native language: Arabic readers selected items for study in a right-to-left fashion, whereas English readers largely selected items from left to right. In Experiment 2, native English readers completed the same task as participants in Experiment 1b, but for some participants, lines of text were rotated upside down to encourage them to read from right to left. Participants who read upside-down text were more likely to first select items on the right side of an array than were participants who studied right-side-up text. These results indicate that reading habits can bias learners' study decisions and can undermine agenda-based regulation.",
keywords = "Metacognition, Self-regulated study",
author = "Robert Ariel and Al-Harthy, {Ibrahim S.} and Was, {Christopher A.} and John Dunlosky",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
doi = "10.3758/s13423-011-0128-3",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "1015--1021",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin and Review",
issn = "1069-9384",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Habitual reading biases in the allocation of study time

AU - Ariel, Robert

AU - Al-Harthy, Ibrahim S.

AU - Was, Christopher A.

AU - Dunlosky, John

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - Item order can bias learners' study decisions and undermine the use of more effective allocation strategies, such as allocating study time to items in one's region of proximal learning. In two experiments, we evaluated whether the influence of item order on study decisions reflects habitual responding based on a reading bias. We manipulated the order in which relatively easy, moderately difficult, and difficult items were presented from left to right on a computer screen and examined selection preference as a function of item order and item difficulty. Experiment 1a was conducted with native Arabic readers and in Arabic, and Experiment 1b was conducted with native English readers and in English. Students from both cultures prioritized items for study in the reading order of their native language: Arabic readers selected items for study in a right-to-left fashion, whereas English readers largely selected items from left to right. In Experiment 2, native English readers completed the same task as participants in Experiment 1b, but for some participants, lines of text were rotated upside down to encourage them to read from right to left. Participants who read upside-down text were more likely to first select items on the right side of an array than were participants who studied right-side-up text. These results indicate that reading habits can bias learners' study decisions and can undermine agenda-based regulation.

AB - Item order can bias learners' study decisions and undermine the use of more effective allocation strategies, such as allocating study time to items in one's region of proximal learning. In two experiments, we evaluated whether the influence of item order on study decisions reflects habitual responding based on a reading bias. We manipulated the order in which relatively easy, moderately difficult, and difficult items were presented from left to right on a computer screen and examined selection preference as a function of item order and item difficulty. Experiment 1a was conducted with native Arabic readers and in Arabic, and Experiment 1b was conducted with native English readers and in English. Students from both cultures prioritized items for study in the reading order of their native language: Arabic readers selected items for study in a right-to-left fashion, whereas English readers largely selected items from left to right. In Experiment 2, native English readers completed the same task as participants in Experiment 1b, but for some participants, lines of text were rotated upside down to encourage them to read from right to left. Participants who read upside-down text were more likely to first select items on the right side of an array than were participants who studied right-side-up text. These results indicate that reading habits can bias learners' study decisions and can undermine agenda-based regulation.

KW - Metacognition

KW - Self-regulated study

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053107281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053107281&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/s13423-011-0128-3

DO - 10.3758/s13423-011-0128-3

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 1015

EP - 1021

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

SN - 1069-9384

IS - 5

ER -