Geothermal energy production from actively-managed CO 2 storage in saline formations

Thomas A. Buscheck, Yunwei Sun, Yue Hao, Mingjie Chen, Benjamin Court, Michael A. Celia, William L. Bourcier, Thomas J. Wolery

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Increased reliance on geothermal energy and CO 2 capture and sequestration (CCS) in deep geological formations are both regarded as a promising means of lowering the amount of CO 2 emitted to the atmosphere and thereby mitigate climate change. We investigate an approach to produce geothermal energy and to sequester CO 2 at low cost and risk by integrating geothermal production with CCS in saline, sedimentary formations where a significant portion of the U.S. geothermal resource base resides. For industrial-scale CO 2 injection in saline formations, pressure increase can be a limiting factor in storage capacity and security, while geothermal energy production can be limited by pressure depletion. Our approach utilizes Active CO 2 Reservoir Management, which combines brine production with CO 2 injection to enable more cost-effective and secure CO 2 storage. The complementary CCS and geothermal systems are integrated synergistically, with CO 2 injection providing pressure support to maintain productivity of geothermal wells, while brine production provides pressure relief and improved injectivity for CO 2 injectors. A volumetric balance between injected and produced fluids mitigates the environmental and economic risks of reservoir overpressure (CCS concern) or underpressure (geothermal concern), including induced seismicity, insufficient well productivity or injectivity, subsidence, and fluid leakage either to or from overlying formations. We investigate the tradeoff between pressure relief at CO 2 injectors and CO 2 breakthrough time at geothermal brine producers for both vertical and horizontal wells, and address the influence of formation dip and permeability heterogeneity. The combined influence of buoyancy and layered heterogeneity delays CO 2 breakthrough at geothermal production wells, particularly when the permeability contrast is large. Our results indicate adequate pressure relief at CO 2 injectors can be attained, while delaying CO 2 breakthrough at production wells for 30 or more years, thus enabling sustainable geothermal power.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationTransactions - Geothermal Resources Council
Pages1401-1409
Number of pages9
Volume35 2
Publication statusPublished - 2011
EventGeothermal Resources Council Annual Meeting 2011, Geothermal 2011 - San Diego, CA, United States
Duration: Oct 23 2011Oct 26 2011

Other

OtherGeothermal Resources Council Annual Meeting 2011, Geothermal 2011
CountryUnited States
CitySan Diego, CA
Period10/23/1110/26/11

Fingerprint

Geothermal energy
geothermal energy
injectors
brine
well
relief
injection
productivity
energy
permeability
Productivity
Geothermal wells
geothermal resources
induced seismicity
Reservoir management
geothermal power
Fluids
overpressure
fluid
fluids

Keywords

  • Binary-cycle geothermal
  • CO capture and sequestration (CCS)
  • Horizontal wells
  • Injectivity
  • Sedimentary formations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geophysics
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Cite this

Buscheck, T. A., Sun, Y., Hao, Y., Chen, M., Court, B., Celia, M. A., ... Wolery, T. J. (2011). Geothermal energy production from actively-managed CO 2 storage in saline formations. In Transactions - Geothermal Resources Council (Vol. 35 2, pp. 1401-1409)

Geothermal energy production from actively-managed CO 2 storage in saline formations. / Buscheck, Thomas A.; Sun, Yunwei; Hao, Yue; Chen, Mingjie; Court, Benjamin; Celia, Michael A.; Bourcier, William L.; Wolery, Thomas J.

Transactions - Geothermal Resources Council. Vol. 35 2 2011. p. 1401-1409.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Buscheck, TA, Sun, Y, Hao, Y, Chen, M, Court, B, Celia, MA, Bourcier, WL & Wolery, TJ 2011, Geothermal energy production from actively-managed CO 2 storage in saline formations. in Transactions - Geothermal Resources Council. vol. 35 2, pp. 1401-1409, Geothermal Resources Council Annual Meeting 2011, Geothermal 2011, San Diego, CA, United States, 10/23/11.
Buscheck TA, Sun Y, Hao Y, Chen M, Court B, Celia MA et al. Geothermal energy production from actively-managed CO 2 storage in saline formations. In Transactions - Geothermal Resources Council. Vol. 35 2. 2011. p. 1401-1409
Buscheck, Thomas A. ; Sun, Yunwei ; Hao, Yue ; Chen, Mingjie ; Court, Benjamin ; Celia, Michael A. ; Bourcier, William L. ; Wolery, Thomas J. / Geothermal energy production from actively-managed CO 2 storage in saline formations. Transactions - Geothermal Resources Council. Vol. 35 2 2011. pp. 1401-1409
@inproceedings{fac1b1afc2a7424faa1b73da2305936e,
title = "Geothermal energy production from actively-managed CO 2 storage in saline formations",
abstract = "Increased reliance on geothermal energy and CO 2 capture and sequestration (CCS) in deep geological formations are both regarded as a promising means of lowering the amount of CO 2 emitted to the atmosphere and thereby mitigate climate change. We investigate an approach to produce geothermal energy and to sequester CO 2 at low cost and risk by integrating geothermal production with CCS in saline, sedimentary formations where a significant portion of the U.S. geothermal resource base resides. For industrial-scale CO 2 injection in saline formations, pressure increase can be a limiting factor in storage capacity and security, while geothermal energy production can be limited by pressure depletion. Our approach utilizes Active CO 2 Reservoir Management, which combines brine production with CO 2 injection to enable more cost-effective and secure CO 2 storage. The complementary CCS and geothermal systems are integrated synergistically, with CO 2 injection providing pressure support to maintain productivity of geothermal wells, while brine production provides pressure relief and improved injectivity for CO 2 injectors. A volumetric balance between injected and produced fluids mitigates the environmental and economic risks of reservoir overpressure (CCS concern) or underpressure (geothermal concern), including induced seismicity, insufficient well productivity or injectivity, subsidence, and fluid leakage either to or from overlying formations. We investigate the tradeoff between pressure relief at CO 2 injectors and CO 2 breakthrough time at geothermal brine producers for both vertical and horizontal wells, and address the influence of formation dip and permeability heterogeneity. The combined influence of buoyancy and layered heterogeneity delays CO 2 breakthrough at geothermal production wells, particularly when the permeability contrast is large. Our results indicate adequate pressure relief at CO 2 injectors can be attained, while delaying CO 2 breakthrough at production wells for 30 or more years, thus enabling sustainable geothermal power.",
keywords = "Binary-cycle geothermal, CO capture and sequestration (CCS), Horizontal wells, Injectivity, Sedimentary formations",
author = "Buscheck, {Thomas A.} and Yunwei Sun and Yue Hao and Mingjie Chen and Benjamin Court and Celia, {Michael A.} and Bourcier, {William L.} and Wolery, {Thomas J.}",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781618394828",
volume = "35 2",
pages = "1401--1409",
booktitle = "Transactions - Geothermal Resources Council",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Geothermal energy production from actively-managed CO 2 storage in saline formations

AU - Buscheck, Thomas A.

AU - Sun, Yunwei

AU - Hao, Yue

AU - Chen, Mingjie

AU - Court, Benjamin

AU - Celia, Michael A.

AU - Bourcier, William L.

AU - Wolery, Thomas J.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Increased reliance on geothermal energy and CO 2 capture and sequestration (CCS) in deep geological formations are both regarded as a promising means of lowering the amount of CO 2 emitted to the atmosphere and thereby mitigate climate change. We investigate an approach to produce geothermal energy and to sequester CO 2 at low cost and risk by integrating geothermal production with CCS in saline, sedimentary formations where a significant portion of the U.S. geothermal resource base resides. For industrial-scale CO 2 injection in saline formations, pressure increase can be a limiting factor in storage capacity and security, while geothermal energy production can be limited by pressure depletion. Our approach utilizes Active CO 2 Reservoir Management, which combines brine production with CO 2 injection to enable more cost-effective and secure CO 2 storage. The complementary CCS and geothermal systems are integrated synergistically, with CO 2 injection providing pressure support to maintain productivity of geothermal wells, while brine production provides pressure relief and improved injectivity for CO 2 injectors. A volumetric balance between injected and produced fluids mitigates the environmental and economic risks of reservoir overpressure (CCS concern) or underpressure (geothermal concern), including induced seismicity, insufficient well productivity or injectivity, subsidence, and fluid leakage either to or from overlying formations. We investigate the tradeoff between pressure relief at CO 2 injectors and CO 2 breakthrough time at geothermal brine producers for both vertical and horizontal wells, and address the influence of formation dip and permeability heterogeneity. The combined influence of buoyancy and layered heterogeneity delays CO 2 breakthrough at geothermal production wells, particularly when the permeability contrast is large. Our results indicate adequate pressure relief at CO 2 injectors can be attained, while delaying CO 2 breakthrough at production wells for 30 or more years, thus enabling sustainable geothermal power.

AB - Increased reliance on geothermal energy and CO 2 capture and sequestration (CCS) in deep geological formations are both regarded as a promising means of lowering the amount of CO 2 emitted to the atmosphere and thereby mitigate climate change. We investigate an approach to produce geothermal energy and to sequester CO 2 at low cost and risk by integrating geothermal production with CCS in saline, sedimentary formations where a significant portion of the U.S. geothermal resource base resides. For industrial-scale CO 2 injection in saline formations, pressure increase can be a limiting factor in storage capacity and security, while geothermal energy production can be limited by pressure depletion. Our approach utilizes Active CO 2 Reservoir Management, which combines brine production with CO 2 injection to enable more cost-effective and secure CO 2 storage. The complementary CCS and geothermal systems are integrated synergistically, with CO 2 injection providing pressure support to maintain productivity of geothermal wells, while brine production provides pressure relief and improved injectivity for CO 2 injectors. A volumetric balance between injected and produced fluids mitigates the environmental and economic risks of reservoir overpressure (CCS concern) or underpressure (geothermal concern), including induced seismicity, insufficient well productivity or injectivity, subsidence, and fluid leakage either to or from overlying formations. We investigate the tradeoff between pressure relief at CO 2 injectors and CO 2 breakthrough time at geothermal brine producers for both vertical and horizontal wells, and address the influence of formation dip and permeability heterogeneity. The combined influence of buoyancy and layered heterogeneity delays CO 2 breakthrough at geothermal production wells, particularly when the permeability contrast is large. Our results indicate adequate pressure relief at CO 2 injectors can be attained, while delaying CO 2 breakthrough at production wells for 30 or more years, thus enabling sustainable geothermal power.

KW - Binary-cycle geothermal

KW - CO capture and sequestration (CCS)

KW - Horizontal wells

KW - Injectivity

KW - Sedimentary formations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860863713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860863713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9781618394828

VL - 35 2

SP - 1401

EP - 1409

BT - Transactions - Geothermal Resources Council

ER -