Fungal diversity in tomato rhizosphere soil under conventional and desert farming systems

Elham A. Kazerooni, Sajeewa S.N. Maharachchikumbura, Velazhahan Rethinasamy, Hamed Al-Mahrouqi, Abdullah M. Al-Sadi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined fungal diversity and composition in conventional (CM) and desert farming (DE) systems in Oman. Fungal diversity in the rhizosphere of tomato was assessed using 454-pyrosequencing and culture-based techniques. Both techniques produced variable results in terms of fungal diversity, with 25% of the fungal classes shared between the two techniques. In addition, pyrosequencing recovered more taxa compared to direct plating. These findings could be attributed to the ability of pyrosequencing to recover taxa that cannot grow or are slow growing on culture media. Both techniques showed that fungal diversity in the conventional farm was comparable to that in the desert farm. However, the composition of fungal classes and taxa in the two farming systems were different. Pyrosequencing revealed that Microsporidetes and Dothideomycetes are the two most common fungal classes in CM and DE, respectively. However, the culture-based technique revealed that Eurotiomycetes was the most abundant class in both farming systems and some classes, such as Microsporidetes, were not detected by the culture-based technique. Although some plant pathogens (e.g., Pythium or Fusarium) were detected in the rhizosphere of tomato, the majority of fungal species in the rhizosphere of tomato were saprophytes. Our study shows that the cultivation system may have an impact on fungal diversity. The factors which affected fungal diversity in both farms are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1462
JournalFrontiers in Microbiology
Volume8
Issue numberAUG
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2 2017

Fingerprint

Rhizosphere
Lycopersicon esculentum
Agriculture
Culture Techniques
Soil
Pythium
Oman
Fusarium
Culture Media
Farms

Keywords

  • Desert fungi
  • Farming system
  • Fungal community
  • Pathogen
  • Saprophytes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology
  • Microbiology (medical)

Cite this

Fungal diversity in tomato rhizosphere soil under conventional and desert farming systems. / Kazerooni, Elham A.; Maharachchikumbura, Sajeewa S.N.; Rethinasamy, Velazhahan; Al-Mahrouqi, Hamed; Al-Sadi, Abdullah M.

In: Frontiers in Microbiology, Vol. 8, No. AUG, 1462, 02.08.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kazerooni, Elham A. ; Maharachchikumbura, Sajeewa S.N. ; Rethinasamy, Velazhahan ; Al-Mahrouqi, Hamed ; Al-Sadi, Abdullah M. / Fungal diversity in tomato rhizosphere soil under conventional and desert farming systems. In: Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017 ; Vol. 8, No. AUG.
@article{a52964d221cf4af1b9ed33fe04f4946d,
title = "Fungal diversity in tomato rhizosphere soil under conventional and desert farming systems",
abstract = "This study examined fungal diversity and composition in conventional (CM) and desert farming (DE) systems in Oman. Fungal diversity in the rhizosphere of tomato was assessed using 454-pyrosequencing and culture-based techniques. Both techniques produced variable results in terms of fungal diversity, with 25{\%} of the fungal classes shared between the two techniques. In addition, pyrosequencing recovered more taxa compared to direct plating. These findings could be attributed to the ability of pyrosequencing to recover taxa that cannot grow or are slow growing on culture media. Both techniques showed that fungal diversity in the conventional farm was comparable to that in the desert farm. However, the composition of fungal classes and taxa in the two farming systems were different. Pyrosequencing revealed that Microsporidetes and Dothideomycetes are the two most common fungal classes in CM and DE, respectively. However, the culture-based technique revealed that Eurotiomycetes was the most abundant class in both farming systems and some classes, such as Microsporidetes, were not detected by the culture-based technique. Although some plant pathogens (e.g., Pythium or Fusarium) were detected in the rhizosphere of tomato, the majority of fungal species in the rhizosphere of tomato were saprophytes. Our study shows that the cultivation system may have an impact on fungal diversity. The factors which affected fungal diversity in both farms are discussed.",
keywords = "Desert fungi, Farming system, Fungal community, Pathogen, Saprophytes",
author = "Kazerooni, {Elham A.} and Maharachchikumbura, {Sajeewa S.N.} and Velazhahan Rethinasamy and Hamed Al-Mahrouqi and Al-Sadi, {Abdullah M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "2",
doi = "10.3389/fmicb.2017.01462",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Frontiers in Microbiology",
issn = "1664-302X",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S. A.",
number = "AUG",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fungal diversity in tomato rhizosphere soil under conventional and desert farming systems

AU - Kazerooni, Elham A.

AU - Maharachchikumbura, Sajeewa S.N.

AU - Rethinasamy, Velazhahan

AU - Al-Mahrouqi, Hamed

AU - Al-Sadi, Abdullah M.

PY - 2017/8/2

Y1 - 2017/8/2

N2 - This study examined fungal diversity and composition in conventional (CM) and desert farming (DE) systems in Oman. Fungal diversity in the rhizosphere of tomato was assessed using 454-pyrosequencing and culture-based techniques. Both techniques produced variable results in terms of fungal diversity, with 25% of the fungal classes shared between the two techniques. In addition, pyrosequencing recovered more taxa compared to direct plating. These findings could be attributed to the ability of pyrosequencing to recover taxa that cannot grow or are slow growing on culture media. Both techniques showed that fungal diversity in the conventional farm was comparable to that in the desert farm. However, the composition of fungal classes and taxa in the two farming systems were different. Pyrosequencing revealed that Microsporidetes and Dothideomycetes are the two most common fungal classes in CM and DE, respectively. However, the culture-based technique revealed that Eurotiomycetes was the most abundant class in both farming systems and some classes, such as Microsporidetes, were not detected by the culture-based technique. Although some plant pathogens (e.g., Pythium or Fusarium) were detected in the rhizosphere of tomato, the majority of fungal species in the rhizosphere of tomato were saprophytes. Our study shows that the cultivation system may have an impact on fungal diversity. The factors which affected fungal diversity in both farms are discussed.

AB - This study examined fungal diversity and composition in conventional (CM) and desert farming (DE) systems in Oman. Fungal diversity in the rhizosphere of tomato was assessed using 454-pyrosequencing and culture-based techniques. Both techniques produced variable results in terms of fungal diversity, with 25% of the fungal classes shared between the two techniques. In addition, pyrosequencing recovered more taxa compared to direct plating. These findings could be attributed to the ability of pyrosequencing to recover taxa that cannot grow or are slow growing on culture media. Both techniques showed that fungal diversity in the conventional farm was comparable to that in the desert farm. However, the composition of fungal classes and taxa in the two farming systems were different. Pyrosequencing revealed that Microsporidetes and Dothideomycetes are the two most common fungal classes in CM and DE, respectively. However, the culture-based technique revealed that Eurotiomycetes was the most abundant class in both farming systems and some classes, such as Microsporidetes, were not detected by the culture-based technique. Although some plant pathogens (e.g., Pythium or Fusarium) were detected in the rhizosphere of tomato, the majority of fungal species in the rhizosphere of tomato were saprophytes. Our study shows that the cultivation system may have an impact on fungal diversity. The factors which affected fungal diversity in both farms are discussed.

KW - Desert fungi

KW - Farming system

KW - Fungal community

KW - Pathogen

KW - Saprophytes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026765670&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026765670&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01462

DO - 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01462

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - Frontiers in Microbiology

JF - Frontiers in Microbiology

SN - 1664-302X

IS - AUG

M1 - 1462

ER -