Framework to compare the model generation methods

Rim Bouhaouel, Naoufel Kraïem, Camile Salinesi, Zuhoor Al-khanjari, Sami Ouali

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Model Driven Engineering (MDE) needs to abstract with different levels the specification or the solution needed to construct a system and represent it in a model. Our study aims to generate fragments of UML diagrams by using the software product line. To outline our contributions, we need to acquire a thorough knowledge of similar methods using models generation. Therefore, in this study we propose a framework to compare model generation methods using the four worlds framework namely: Nature, system, usage and development. We use it to compare four methods of model generation: FUML, UMLAUT, RSM, FUJABA and to represent the contributions of our study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-66
Number of pages13
JournalAsian Journal of Scientific Research
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Specifications

Keywords

  • Comparison framework
  • MDE
  • Model
  • UML

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Framework to compare the model generation methods. / Bouhaouel, Rim; Kraïem, Naoufel; Salinesi, Camile; Al-khanjari, Zuhoor; Ouali, Sami.

In: Asian Journal of Scientific Research, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2015, p. 54-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bouhaouel, Rim ; Kraïem, Naoufel ; Salinesi, Camile ; Al-khanjari, Zuhoor ; Ouali, Sami. / Framework to compare the model generation methods. In: Asian Journal of Scientific Research. 2015 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 54-66.
@article{08ccef665e1b4fccb9f2414fa7ed855a,
title = "Framework to compare the model generation methods",
abstract = "The Model Driven Engineering (MDE) needs to abstract with different levels the specification or the solution needed to construct a system and represent it in a model. Our study aims to generate fragments of UML diagrams by using the software product line. To outline our contributions, we need to acquire a thorough knowledge of similar methods using models generation. Therefore, in this study we propose a framework to compare model generation methods using the four worlds framework namely: Nature, system, usage and development. We use it to compare four methods of model generation: FUML, UMLAUT, RSM, FUJABA and to represent the contributions of our study.",
keywords = "Comparison framework, MDE, Model, UML",
author = "Rim Bouhaouel and Naoufel Kra{\"i}em and Camile Salinesi and Zuhoor Al-khanjari and Sami Ouali",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.3923/ajsr.2015.54.66",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "54--66",
journal = "Asian Journal of Scientific Research",
issn = "1992-1454",
publisher = "Science Alert Journals",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Framework to compare the model generation methods

AU - Bouhaouel, Rim

AU - Kraïem, Naoufel

AU - Salinesi, Camile

AU - Al-khanjari, Zuhoor

AU - Ouali, Sami

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The Model Driven Engineering (MDE) needs to abstract with different levels the specification or the solution needed to construct a system and represent it in a model. Our study aims to generate fragments of UML diagrams by using the software product line. To outline our contributions, we need to acquire a thorough knowledge of similar methods using models generation. Therefore, in this study we propose a framework to compare model generation methods using the four worlds framework namely: Nature, system, usage and development. We use it to compare four methods of model generation: FUML, UMLAUT, RSM, FUJABA and to represent the contributions of our study.

AB - The Model Driven Engineering (MDE) needs to abstract with different levels the specification or the solution needed to construct a system and represent it in a model. Our study aims to generate fragments of UML diagrams by using the software product line. To outline our contributions, we need to acquire a thorough knowledge of similar methods using models generation. Therefore, in this study we propose a framework to compare model generation methods using the four worlds framework namely: Nature, system, usage and development. We use it to compare four methods of model generation: FUML, UMLAUT, RSM, FUJABA and to represent the contributions of our study.

KW - Comparison framework

KW - MDE

KW - Model

KW - UML

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84918515676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84918515676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3923/ajsr.2015.54.66

DO - 10.3923/ajsr.2015.54.66

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 54

EP - 66

JO - Asian Journal of Scientific Research

JF - Asian Journal of Scientific Research

SN - 1992-1454

IS - 1

ER -