Fourier-Hilbert versus Hartley-Hilbert transforms with some geophysical applications

N. Sundararajan, Y. Srinivas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An intimate mathematical relation between Hartley and Hilbert transforms is given here in contrast with the well known Fourier and Hilbert transform relations. It is interesting to note that the Fourier-Hilbert and Hartley-Hilbert transforms while possessing the same magnitude differ in phase by 270°. The inverse Hartley-Hilbert transform returns the original function unlike the Fourier-Hilbert transform which results the negative of the original function. Further, it may be realized that the envelope defined here of the analytic signal in both Fourier-Hilbert and Hartley-Hilbert domains numerically remain the same while differing in polarity. The feasibility of Hartley-Hilbert transform for a straight forward interpretation, total magnetic anomaly due to a thin plate from Tejpur, India and self potential data of the Sulleymonkey anomaly in the Ergani Copper district, Turkey are illustrated in contrast with the Fourier-Hilbert transform. This pair of transforms have innumerable geophysical applications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)157-161
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Applied Geophysics
Volume71
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2010

Fingerprint

transform
Turkey
thin plates
magnetic anomalies
India
polarity
envelopes
anomalies
copper
Fourier transform
self potential
magnetic anomaly
anomaly

Keywords

  • Amplitude
  • Analytic signal
  • Hartley Hilbert transform
  • Interpretation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geophysics

Cite this

Fourier-Hilbert versus Hartley-Hilbert transforms with some geophysical applications. / Sundararajan, N.; Srinivas, Y.

In: Journal of Applied Geophysics, Vol. 71, No. 4, 08.2010, p. 157-161.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1d39c3f1fd454ac5aa10dc27b9e83981,
title = "Fourier-Hilbert versus Hartley-Hilbert transforms with some geophysical applications",
abstract = "An intimate mathematical relation between Hartley and Hilbert transforms is given here in contrast with the well known Fourier and Hilbert transform relations. It is interesting to note that the Fourier-Hilbert and Hartley-Hilbert transforms while possessing the same magnitude differ in phase by 270°. The inverse Hartley-Hilbert transform returns the original function unlike the Fourier-Hilbert transform which results the negative of the original function. Further, it may be realized that the envelope defined here of the analytic signal in both Fourier-Hilbert and Hartley-Hilbert domains numerically remain the same while differing in polarity. The feasibility of Hartley-Hilbert transform for a straight forward interpretation, total magnetic anomaly due to a thin plate from Tejpur, India and self potential data of the Sulleymonkey anomaly in the Ergani Copper district, Turkey are illustrated in contrast with the Fourier-Hilbert transform. This pair of transforms have innumerable geophysical applications.",
keywords = "Amplitude, Analytic signal, Hartley Hilbert transform, Interpretation",
author = "N. Sundararajan and Y. Srinivas",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.jappgeo.2010.06.005",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "157--161",
journal = "Journal of Applied Geophysics",
issn = "0926-9851",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fourier-Hilbert versus Hartley-Hilbert transforms with some geophysical applications

AU - Sundararajan, N.

AU - Srinivas, Y.

PY - 2010/8

Y1 - 2010/8

N2 - An intimate mathematical relation between Hartley and Hilbert transforms is given here in contrast with the well known Fourier and Hilbert transform relations. It is interesting to note that the Fourier-Hilbert and Hartley-Hilbert transforms while possessing the same magnitude differ in phase by 270°. The inverse Hartley-Hilbert transform returns the original function unlike the Fourier-Hilbert transform which results the negative of the original function. Further, it may be realized that the envelope defined here of the analytic signal in both Fourier-Hilbert and Hartley-Hilbert domains numerically remain the same while differing in polarity. The feasibility of Hartley-Hilbert transform for a straight forward interpretation, total magnetic anomaly due to a thin plate from Tejpur, India and self potential data of the Sulleymonkey anomaly in the Ergani Copper district, Turkey are illustrated in contrast with the Fourier-Hilbert transform. This pair of transforms have innumerable geophysical applications.

AB - An intimate mathematical relation between Hartley and Hilbert transforms is given here in contrast with the well known Fourier and Hilbert transform relations. It is interesting to note that the Fourier-Hilbert and Hartley-Hilbert transforms while possessing the same magnitude differ in phase by 270°. The inverse Hartley-Hilbert transform returns the original function unlike the Fourier-Hilbert transform which results the negative of the original function. Further, it may be realized that the envelope defined here of the analytic signal in both Fourier-Hilbert and Hartley-Hilbert domains numerically remain the same while differing in polarity. The feasibility of Hartley-Hilbert transform for a straight forward interpretation, total magnetic anomaly due to a thin plate from Tejpur, India and self potential data of the Sulleymonkey anomaly in the Ergani Copper district, Turkey are illustrated in contrast with the Fourier-Hilbert transform. This pair of transforms have innumerable geophysical applications.

KW - Amplitude

KW - Analytic signal

KW - Hartley Hilbert transform

KW - Interpretation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955276302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955276302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2010.06.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2010.06.005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77955276302

VL - 71

SP - 157

EP - 161

JO - Journal of Applied Geophysics

JF - Journal of Applied Geophysics

SN - 0926-9851

IS - 4

ER -