Fetal macrosomia. Risk factors and outcome

Mariam Mathew*, Lovina Machado, Rahma Al-Ghabshi, Rahma Al-Haddabi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the risk factors predisposing to fetal macrosomia and assess the maternal and perinatal outcome in these patients. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of all macrosomic deliveries in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Sultanate of Oman, during a 3-year period from January 2001 - December 2003. The maternal and neonatal records of infants with birth weight of ≥4000 g (n=275) were reviewed. Outcome variables included demographic profile, antenatal risk factors, mode of delivery and maternal and perinatal complications. Results: A total of 7367 deliveries occurred during the study period. The rate of macrosomic deliveries was 3.75% and the rate of deliveries ≥4500 g was 0.48%. The mean birth weight of the study group was 4230 ± 220 g. Obesity, diabetes, prolonged gestation and postpartum hemorrhage were significantly higher in the study group. The cesarean section rate was 25.8% for the study group compared to the general incidence of 13.1% during the study period (p<0.0001). The incidence of shoulder dystocia was 7.6% compared to the general incidence of 0.48% during the study period (p<0.0001). There were 7 cases of Erb's palsy, all except one recovered without sequelae by 3 months of age. Conclusion: Gestational diabetes, maternal obesity, increasing age and parity were the main risk factors for fetal macrosomia. The incidence of shoulder dystocia, birth injuries and neonatal morbidity increased in this group.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)96-100
Number of pages5
JournalSaudi Medical Journal
Volume26
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fetal macrosomia. Risk factors and outcome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this