Fee splitting in ophthalmology

Alex V. Levin, Anuradha Ganesh, Ahmed Al-Busaidi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fee splitting and co-management are common practices in ophthalmology. These arrangements may conflict with the ethical principles governing the doctor-patient relationship, may constitute professional misconduct, and at times, may be illegal. Implications and perceptions of these practices may vary between different cultures. Full disclosure to the patient may minimize the adverse effects of conflicts of interest that arise from these practices, and may thereby allow these practices to be deemed acceptable by some cultural morays, professional guidelines, or by law. Disclosure does not necessarily relieve the physician from a potential ethical compromise. This review examines the practice of fee splitting in ophthalmology, its legal implications, the policies or guidelines governing such arrangements, and the possible ethical ramifications.Acomparative view between 3 countries, Canada, the United States, and Oman, was conducted; illustrating that even in disparate cultures, there may be some universality to the application of ethical principles.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-27
Number of pages7
JournalCanadian Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Fees and Charges
Disclosure
Ophthalmology
Professional Misconduct
Guidelines
Oman
Conflict of Interest
Practice Management
Canada
Physicians
Conflict (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Fee splitting in ophthalmology. / Levin, Alex V.; Ganesh, Anuradha; Al-Busaidi, Ahmed.

In: Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2011, p. 21-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Levin, Alex V. ; Ganesh, Anuradha ; Al-Busaidi, Ahmed. / Fee splitting in ophthalmology. In: Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. 2011 ; Vol. 46, No. 1. pp. 21-27.
@article{4a4667a21e5b450ba7e6bb53746693a2,
title = "Fee splitting in ophthalmology",
abstract = "Fee splitting and co-management are common practices in ophthalmology. These arrangements may conflict with the ethical principles governing the doctor-patient relationship, may constitute professional misconduct, and at times, may be illegal. Implications and perceptions of these practices may vary between different cultures. Full disclosure to the patient may minimize the adverse effects of conflicts of interest that arise from these practices, and may thereby allow these practices to be deemed acceptable by some cultural morays, professional guidelines, or by law. Disclosure does not necessarily relieve the physician from a potential ethical compromise. This review examines the practice of fee splitting in ophthalmology, its legal implications, the policies or guidelines governing such arrangements, and the possible ethical ramifications.Acomparative view between 3 countries, Canada, the United States, and Oman, was conducted; illustrating that even in disparate cultures, there may be some universality to the application of ethical principles.",
author = "Levin, {Alex V.} and Anuradha Ganesh and Ahmed Al-Busaidi",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.3129/i10-097",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "21--27",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0008-4182",
publisher = "Canadian Ophthalmological Society",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fee splitting in ophthalmology

AU - Levin, Alex V.

AU - Ganesh, Anuradha

AU - Al-Busaidi, Ahmed

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Fee splitting and co-management are common practices in ophthalmology. These arrangements may conflict with the ethical principles governing the doctor-patient relationship, may constitute professional misconduct, and at times, may be illegal. Implications and perceptions of these practices may vary between different cultures. Full disclosure to the patient may minimize the adverse effects of conflicts of interest that arise from these practices, and may thereby allow these practices to be deemed acceptable by some cultural morays, professional guidelines, or by law. Disclosure does not necessarily relieve the physician from a potential ethical compromise. This review examines the practice of fee splitting in ophthalmology, its legal implications, the policies or guidelines governing such arrangements, and the possible ethical ramifications.Acomparative view between 3 countries, Canada, the United States, and Oman, was conducted; illustrating that even in disparate cultures, there may be some universality to the application of ethical principles.

AB - Fee splitting and co-management are common practices in ophthalmology. These arrangements may conflict with the ethical principles governing the doctor-patient relationship, may constitute professional misconduct, and at times, may be illegal. Implications and perceptions of these practices may vary between different cultures. Full disclosure to the patient may minimize the adverse effects of conflicts of interest that arise from these practices, and may thereby allow these practices to be deemed acceptable by some cultural morays, professional guidelines, or by law. Disclosure does not necessarily relieve the physician from a potential ethical compromise. This review examines the practice of fee splitting in ophthalmology, its legal implications, the policies or guidelines governing such arrangements, and the possible ethical ramifications.Acomparative view between 3 countries, Canada, the United States, and Oman, was conducted; illustrating that even in disparate cultures, there may be some universality to the application of ethical principles.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79751496457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79751496457&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3129/i10-097

DO - 10.3129/i10-097

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 21

EP - 27

JO - Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0008-4182

IS - 1

ER -