TY - JOUR
T1 - Fee splitting in ophthalmology
AU - Levin, Alex V.
AU - Ganesh, Anuradha
AU - Al-Busaidi, Ahmed
N1 - Funding Information:
Support: This study was supported in part by Brandan’s Eye Research Fund and The Foerderer Fund.
PY - 2011/2
Y1 - 2011/2
N2 - Fee splitting and co-management are common practices in ophthalmology. These arrangements may conflict with the ethical principles governing the doctor-patient relationship, may constitute professional misconduct, and at times, may be illegal. Implications and perceptions of these practices may vary between different cultures. Full disclosure to the patient may minimize the adverse effects of conflicts of interest that arise from these practices, and may thereby allow these practices to be deemed acceptable by some cultural morays, professional guidelines, or by law. Disclosure does not necessarily relieve the physician from a potential ethical compromise. This review examines the practice of fee splitting in ophthalmology, its legal implications, the policies or guidelines governing such arrangements, and the possible ethical ramifications.Acomparative view between 3 countries, Canada, the United States, and Oman, was conducted; illustrating that even in disparate cultures, there may be some universality to the application of ethical principles.
AB - Fee splitting and co-management are common practices in ophthalmology. These arrangements may conflict with the ethical principles governing the doctor-patient relationship, may constitute professional misconduct, and at times, may be illegal. Implications and perceptions of these practices may vary between different cultures. Full disclosure to the patient may minimize the adverse effects of conflicts of interest that arise from these practices, and may thereby allow these practices to be deemed acceptable by some cultural morays, professional guidelines, or by law. Disclosure does not necessarily relieve the physician from a potential ethical compromise. This review examines the practice of fee splitting in ophthalmology, its legal implications, the policies or guidelines governing such arrangements, and the possible ethical ramifications.Acomparative view between 3 countries, Canada, the United States, and Oman, was conducted; illustrating that even in disparate cultures, there may be some universality to the application of ethical principles.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79751496457&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79751496457&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3129/i10-097
DO - 10.3129/i10-097
M3 - Review article
C2 - 21283153
AN - SCOPUS:79751496457
SN - 0008-4182
VL - 46
SP - 21
EP - 27
JO - Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology
JF - Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology
IS - 1
ER -