Factors associated with pediatrician attitudes over the use of complementary and traditional medicine on children in Muscat, Oman

Muna Ahmed Al Saadoon, Mohammed Suweilem Al Jafari, Bader Darwish Al Dhouyani, Syed Rizvi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the attitude of pediatricians toward the use of complementary and Traditional Medicine (TM) on children in Muscat, Oman. A cross-sectional survey was performed using a self-completed questionnaire during the year 2012. A total of 67 pediatricians, comprising of 30 males (44.8%) and 37 females (55.2%) participated in the study. The majority of the studied group (83.5%) was of the opinion that most types of complementary and TM are not safe for children, except spiritual healing, to which 53.7% considered as safe. About one third (29.9%) of the participants reported that they might recommend complementary and TM for sick children in the future. Almost half the participants (52.2%) acknowledged personal use of complementary and TM in the past and 67.2% reported that their family members used these medicines. Herbal therapy was found to be the most commonly used method (38.9%) followed by spiritual (33.9%), cautery (20.2%) and Curucoma (15.7%). Other methods, which include; acupuncture, bone healing and Chinese healing were also found to be in use but in rare manner. Knowledge level of TM and complementary medicine of most of the doctors was found to be low but one third of them acknowledged that they may recommend these treatments to their patients in future. Therefore, training pediatricians on the types, benefits and side effects of complementary and TM is recommended.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-68
Number of pages4
JournalInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management
Volume4
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Oman
Traditional Medicine
Complementary Therapies
Spiritual Therapies
Phytotherapy
Cautery
Acupuncture
Pediatricians
Cross-Sectional Studies
Bone and Bones

Keywords

  • Attitude
  • Children
  • Complementary medicine
  • Oman
  • Pediatrician
  • Traditional medicine (TM)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Factors associated with pediatrician attitudes over the use of complementary and traditional medicine on children in Muscat, Oman. / Saadoon, Muna Ahmed Al; Jafari, Mohammed Suweilem Al; Dhouyani, Bader Darwish Al; Rizvi, Syed.

In: International Journal of Health Policy and Management, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2015, p. 65-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dff09cd6ce66481faed09835ae2d7aa6,
title = "Factors associated with pediatrician attitudes over the use of complementary and traditional medicine on children in Muscat, Oman",
abstract = "This study aimed to evaluate the attitude of pediatricians toward the use of complementary and Traditional Medicine (TM) on children in Muscat, Oman. A cross-sectional survey was performed using a self-completed questionnaire during the year 2012. A total of 67 pediatricians, comprising of 30 males (44.8{\%}) and 37 females (55.2{\%}) participated in the study. The majority of the studied group (83.5{\%}) was of the opinion that most types of complementary and TM are not safe for children, except spiritual healing, to which 53.7{\%} considered as safe. About one third (29.9{\%}) of the participants reported that they might recommend complementary and TM for sick children in the future. Almost half the participants (52.2{\%}) acknowledged personal use of complementary and TM in the past and 67.2{\%} reported that their family members used these medicines. Herbal therapy was found to be the most commonly used method (38.9{\%}) followed by spiritual (33.9{\%}), cautery (20.2{\%}) and Curucoma (15.7{\%}). Other methods, which include; acupuncture, bone healing and Chinese healing were also found to be in use but in rare manner. Knowledge level of TM and complementary medicine of most of the doctors was found to be low but one third of them acknowledged that they may recommend these treatments to their patients in future. Therefore, training pediatricians on the types, benefits and side effects of complementary and TM is recommended.",
keywords = "Attitude, Children, Complementary medicine, Oman, Pediatrician, Traditional medicine (TM)",
author = "Saadoon, {Muna Ahmed Al} and Jafari, {Mohammed Suweilem Al} and Dhouyani, {Bader Darwish Al} and Syed Rizvi",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.15171/ijhpm.2015.11",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "65--68",
journal = "International Journal of Health Policy and Management",
issn = "2322-5939",
publisher = "Kerman University of Medical Science",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Factors associated with pediatrician attitudes over the use of complementary and traditional medicine on children in Muscat, Oman

AU - Saadoon, Muna Ahmed Al

AU - Jafari, Mohammed Suweilem Al

AU - Dhouyani, Bader Darwish Al

AU - Rizvi, Syed

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This study aimed to evaluate the attitude of pediatricians toward the use of complementary and Traditional Medicine (TM) on children in Muscat, Oman. A cross-sectional survey was performed using a self-completed questionnaire during the year 2012. A total of 67 pediatricians, comprising of 30 males (44.8%) and 37 females (55.2%) participated in the study. The majority of the studied group (83.5%) was of the opinion that most types of complementary and TM are not safe for children, except spiritual healing, to which 53.7% considered as safe. About one third (29.9%) of the participants reported that they might recommend complementary and TM for sick children in the future. Almost half the participants (52.2%) acknowledged personal use of complementary and TM in the past and 67.2% reported that their family members used these medicines. Herbal therapy was found to be the most commonly used method (38.9%) followed by spiritual (33.9%), cautery (20.2%) and Curucoma (15.7%). Other methods, which include; acupuncture, bone healing and Chinese healing were also found to be in use but in rare manner. Knowledge level of TM and complementary medicine of most of the doctors was found to be low but one third of them acknowledged that they may recommend these treatments to their patients in future. Therefore, training pediatricians on the types, benefits and side effects of complementary and TM is recommended.

AB - This study aimed to evaluate the attitude of pediatricians toward the use of complementary and Traditional Medicine (TM) on children in Muscat, Oman. A cross-sectional survey was performed using a self-completed questionnaire during the year 2012. A total of 67 pediatricians, comprising of 30 males (44.8%) and 37 females (55.2%) participated in the study. The majority of the studied group (83.5%) was of the opinion that most types of complementary and TM are not safe for children, except spiritual healing, to which 53.7% considered as safe. About one third (29.9%) of the participants reported that they might recommend complementary and TM for sick children in the future. Almost half the participants (52.2%) acknowledged personal use of complementary and TM in the past and 67.2% reported that their family members used these medicines. Herbal therapy was found to be the most commonly used method (38.9%) followed by spiritual (33.9%), cautery (20.2%) and Curucoma (15.7%). Other methods, which include; acupuncture, bone healing and Chinese healing were also found to be in use but in rare manner. Knowledge level of TM and complementary medicine of most of the doctors was found to be low but one third of them acknowledged that they may recommend these treatments to their patients in future. Therefore, training pediatricians on the types, benefits and side effects of complementary and TM is recommended.

KW - Attitude

KW - Children

KW - Complementary medicine

KW - Oman

KW - Pediatrician

KW - Traditional medicine (TM)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002376295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85002376295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.11

DO - 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.11

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 65

EP - 68

JO - International Journal of Health Policy and Management

JF - International Journal of Health Policy and Management

SN - 2322-5939

IS - 2

ER -