Exploring future accountants’ academic fraud (in)tolerance: Oman evidence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the (in)tolerance level of accounting major students in Oman toward identified integrity destroying academic activities. Design/methodology/approach: A triangulation approach was adopted whereby a questionnaire survey on academic fraud (AF) was administered to a group of Omani major accounting students. The descriptive statistical results were further analyzed and validated using in-depth interviews in exploring further the students’ tolerance decisions. Findings: A conceivably low and non-disturbing tolerance level toward the myriads of integrity destroying academic activities was documented. The tolerance is, however, observed to be dynamic in nature as it is sensitive to fraud “severity” and “seriousness”, i.e. it increases as AF activities become less severe and serious. Minor free-ride is tolerated the most, followed by minor plagiarism and seldom forgery. These AF activities were tolerated most by female and academically weak students. The varying results suggest that demographic factors do play a role in shaping Omani future accountants’ AF tolerance. The interview results further point to the intertwined factors of academic, family and peers, as well as religion that primarily influence their AF tolerance levels. Originality/value: The research fills the extremely scarce accounting education literature in Oman by documenting fresh evidence of AF (in)tolerance among future members of the country’s accountancy profession. As academic is the primary source of accountants’ accountability and integrity knowledge and training base, investigating accounting students’ tolerance toward integrity in the acute context of AF would effectively provide a reflection of the profession’s future integrity environment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)66-83
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Accounting in Emerging Economies
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 5 2018

Fingerprint

Oman
fraud
tolerance
integrity
student
evidence
profession
Accountants
Tolerance
Fraud
triangulation
questionnaire survey
religion
accountability
demographic factors
interview
fill
Religion
Integrity
education

Keywords

  • Academic fraud
  • Accounting education
  • Integrity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Development

Cite this

Exploring future accountants’ academic fraud (in)tolerance : Oman evidence. / Nahar, Hairul.

In: Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, Vol. 8, No. 1, 05.02.2018, p. 66-83.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a617a7b746424d7d8a3192c20f753ee2,
title = "Exploring future accountants’ academic fraud (in)tolerance: Oman evidence",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the (in)tolerance level of accounting major students in Oman toward identified integrity destroying academic activities. Design/methodology/approach: A triangulation approach was adopted whereby a questionnaire survey on academic fraud (AF) was administered to a group of Omani major accounting students. The descriptive statistical results were further analyzed and validated using in-depth interviews in exploring further the students’ tolerance decisions. Findings: A conceivably low and non-disturbing tolerance level toward the myriads of integrity destroying academic activities was documented. The tolerance is, however, observed to be dynamic in nature as it is sensitive to fraud “severity” and “seriousness”, i.e. it increases as AF activities become less severe and serious. Minor free-ride is tolerated the most, followed by minor plagiarism and seldom forgery. These AF activities were tolerated most by female and academically weak students. The varying results suggest that demographic factors do play a role in shaping Omani future accountants’ AF tolerance. The interview results further point to the intertwined factors of academic, family and peers, as well as religion that primarily influence their AF tolerance levels. Originality/value: The research fills the extremely scarce accounting education literature in Oman by documenting fresh evidence of AF (in)tolerance among future members of the country’s accountancy profession. As academic is the primary source of accountants’ accountability and integrity knowledge and training base, investigating accounting students’ tolerance toward integrity in the acute context of AF would effectively provide a reflection of the profession’s future integrity environment.",
keywords = "Academic fraud, Accounting education, Integrity",
author = "Hairul Nahar",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1108/JAEE-04-2017-0050",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "66--83",
journal = "Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies",
issn = "2042-1168",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring future accountants’ academic fraud (in)tolerance

T2 - Oman evidence

AU - Nahar, Hairul

PY - 2018/2/5

Y1 - 2018/2/5

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the (in)tolerance level of accounting major students in Oman toward identified integrity destroying academic activities. Design/methodology/approach: A triangulation approach was adopted whereby a questionnaire survey on academic fraud (AF) was administered to a group of Omani major accounting students. The descriptive statistical results were further analyzed and validated using in-depth interviews in exploring further the students’ tolerance decisions. Findings: A conceivably low and non-disturbing tolerance level toward the myriads of integrity destroying academic activities was documented. The tolerance is, however, observed to be dynamic in nature as it is sensitive to fraud “severity” and “seriousness”, i.e. it increases as AF activities become less severe and serious. Minor free-ride is tolerated the most, followed by minor plagiarism and seldom forgery. These AF activities were tolerated most by female and academically weak students. The varying results suggest that demographic factors do play a role in shaping Omani future accountants’ AF tolerance. The interview results further point to the intertwined factors of academic, family and peers, as well as religion that primarily influence their AF tolerance levels. Originality/value: The research fills the extremely scarce accounting education literature in Oman by documenting fresh evidence of AF (in)tolerance among future members of the country’s accountancy profession. As academic is the primary source of accountants’ accountability and integrity knowledge and training base, investigating accounting students’ tolerance toward integrity in the acute context of AF would effectively provide a reflection of the profession’s future integrity environment.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the (in)tolerance level of accounting major students in Oman toward identified integrity destroying academic activities. Design/methodology/approach: A triangulation approach was adopted whereby a questionnaire survey on academic fraud (AF) was administered to a group of Omani major accounting students. The descriptive statistical results were further analyzed and validated using in-depth interviews in exploring further the students’ tolerance decisions. Findings: A conceivably low and non-disturbing tolerance level toward the myriads of integrity destroying academic activities was documented. The tolerance is, however, observed to be dynamic in nature as it is sensitive to fraud “severity” and “seriousness”, i.e. it increases as AF activities become less severe and serious. Minor free-ride is tolerated the most, followed by minor plagiarism and seldom forgery. These AF activities were tolerated most by female and academically weak students. The varying results suggest that demographic factors do play a role in shaping Omani future accountants’ AF tolerance. The interview results further point to the intertwined factors of academic, family and peers, as well as religion that primarily influence their AF tolerance levels. Originality/value: The research fills the extremely scarce accounting education literature in Oman by documenting fresh evidence of AF (in)tolerance among future members of the country’s accountancy profession. As academic is the primary source of accountants’ accountability and integrity knowledge and training base, investigating accounting students’ tolerance toward integrity in the acute context of AF would effectively provide a reflection of the profession’s future integrity environment.

KW - Academic fraud

KW - Accounting education

KW - Integrity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062029599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062029599&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/JAEE-04-2017-0050

DO - 10.1108/JAEE-04-2017-0050

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85062029599

VL - 8

SP - 66

EP - 83

JO - Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies

JF - Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies

SN - 2042-1168

IS - 1

ER -