Evaluation of three adjusting manoeuvres and type of endotracheal tube in the success of air-Q ™ aided tracheal intubation

R. M. Khan, Naresh K. Kaul, P. H. Neelakanthan, P. K. Sharma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The present study observed whether the use of three different adjusting manoeuvres and use of an armoured tracheal tube would increase the success rate of tracheal intubation, aided by the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway (air-Q ILA). Method: Fifty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II patients undergoing elective surgical procedures were randomly assigned to two groups. In the endotracheal tube (ETT) group, standard ETT was used, while in the armoured ETT (AETT) group, tracheal intubation was performed using AETT. After a uniform premedication, induction and relaxation technique, an appropriate sized air-Q ILA with ETT in-situ, was placed. After good ventilation, a flexible fibrescope was passed down the ETT, and the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) was documented. Subsequently, three adjusting manoeuvres were applied in sequence. These included firstly, backward pressure over the larynx; secondly, head extension; and lastly, neck fexion. After noting the POGO score with each adjusting manoeuvre, the incidence of successful intubation was noted, with and without manoeuvres. Results: The best POGO score (84%) was observed with the application of backward pressure. Successful tracheal intubation was achieved in 56-60% of patients without the use of any manoeuvres, using either type of tracheal tube. For the rest, tracheal intubation was achieved using backward pressure, except in one patient from the ETT group. The incidence of successful tracheal intubation was nearly identical with either type of ETT. Conclusion: Successful tracheal intubation can be achieved in 96% of cases using adjusting manoeuvres. The nature of the tracheal tubes did not influence the success rate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)157-160
Number of pages4
JournalSouthern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia
Volume18
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Intubation
Air
Tongue
Pressure
Elective Surgical Procedures
Relaxation Therapy
Premedication
Incidence
Larynx
Ventilation
Neck
Head

Keywords

  • Adjusting manoeuvres
  • Air-Q intubating laryngeal mask
  • Armoured tracheal tube
  • Pogo scoring
  • Tracheal intubation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Evaluation of three adjusting manoeuvres and type of endotracheal tube in the success of air-Q ™ aided tracheal intubation. / Khan, R. M.; Kaul, Naresh K.; Neelakanthan, P. H.; Sharma, P. K.

In: Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2012, p. 157-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{598cd815d2734aeda86dbd8455e8d5e6,
title = "Evaluation of three adjusting manoeuvres and type of endotracheal tube in the success of air-Q ™ aided tracheal intubation",
abstract = "Background: The present study observed whether the use of three different adjusting manoeuvres and use of an armoured tracheal tube would increase the success rate of tracheal intubation, aided by the air-Q ™ intubating laryngeal airway (air-Q ™ ILA). Method: Fifty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II patients undergoing elective surgical procedures were randomly assigned to two groups. In the endotracheal tube (ETT) group, standard ETT was used, while in the armoured ETT (AETT) group, tracheal intubation was performed using AETT. After a uniform premedication, induction and relaxation technique, an appropriate sized air-Q ™ ILA with ETT in-situ, was placed. After good ventilation, a flexible fibrescope was passed down the ETT, and the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) was documented. Subsequently, three adjusting manoeuvres were applied in sequence. These included firstly, backward pressure over the larynx; secondly, head extension; and lastly, neck fexion. After noting the POGO score with each adjusting manoeuvre, the incidence of successful intubation was noted, with and without manoeuvres. Results: The best POGO score (84{\%}) was observed with the application of backward pressure. Successful tracheal intubation was achieved in 56-60{\%} of patients without the use of any manoeuvres, using either type of tracheal tube. For the rest, tracheal intubation was achieved using backward pressure, except in one patient from the ETT group. The incidence of successful tracheal intubation was nearly identical with either type of ETT. Conclusion: Successful tracheal intubation can be achieved in 96{\%} of cases using adjusting manoeuvres. The nature of the tracheal tubes did not influence the success rate.",
keywords = "Adjusting manoeuvres, Air-Q intubating laryngeal mask, Armoured tracheal tube, Pogo scoring, Tracheal intubation",
author = "Khan, {R. M.} and Kaul, {Naresh K.} and Neelakanthan, {P. H.} and Sharma, {P. K.}",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "157--160",
journal = "Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "1027-9148",
publisher = "In House Publications",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of three adjusting manoeuvres and type of endotracheal tube in the success of air-Q ™ aided tracheal intubation

AU - Khan, R. M.

AU - Kaul, Naresh K.

AU - Neelakanthan, P. H.

AU - Sharma, P. K.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Background: The present study observed whether the use of three different adjusting manoeuvres and use of an armoured tracheal tube would increase the success rate of tracheal intubation, aided by the air-Q ™ intubating laryngeal airway (air-Q ™ ILA). Method: Fifty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II patients undergoing elective surgical procedures were randomly assigned to two groups. In the endotracheal tube (ETT) group, standard ETT was used, while in the armoured ETT (AETT) group, tracheal intubation was performed using AETT. After a uniform premedication, induction and relaxation technique, an appropriate sized air-Q ™ ILA with ETT in-situ, was placed. After good ventilation, a flexible fibrescope was passed down the ETT, and the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) was documented. Subsequently, three adjusting manoeuvres were applied in sequence. These included firstly, backward pressure over the larynx; secondly, head extension; and lastly, neck fexion. After noting the POGO score with each adjusting manoeuvre, the incidence of successful intubation was noted, with and without manoeuvres. Results: The best POGO score (84%) was observed with the application of backward pressure. Successful tracheal intubation was achieved in 56-60% of patients without the use of any manoeuvres, using either type of tracheal tube. For the rest, tracheal intubation was achieved using backward pressure, except in one patient from the ETT group. The incidence of successful tracheal intubation was nearly identical with either type of ETT. Conclusion: Successful tracheal intubation can be achieved in 96% of cases using adjusting manoeuvres. The nature of the tracheal tubes did not influence the success rate.

AB - Background: The present study observed whether the use of three different adjusting manoeuvres and use of an armoured tracheal tube would increase the success rate of tracheal intubation, aided by the air-Q ™ intubating laryngeal airway (air-Q ™ ILA). Method: Fifty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II patients undergoing elective surgical procedures were randomly assigned to two groups. In the endotracheal tube (ETT) group, standard ETT was used, while in the armoured ETT (AETT) group, tracheal intubation was performed using AETT. After a uniform premedication, induction and relaxation technique, an appropriate sized air-Q ™ ILA with ETT in-situ, was placed. After good ventilation, a flexible fibrescope was passed down the ETT, and the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) was documented. Subsequently, three adjusting manoeuvres were applied in sequence. These included firstly, backward pressure over the larynx; secondly, head extension; and lastly, neck fexion. After noting the POGO score with each adjusting manoeuvre, the incidence of successful intubation was noted, with and without manoeuvres. Results: The best POGO score (84%) was observed with the application of backward pressure. Successful tracheal intubation was achieved in 56-60% of patients without the use of any manoeuvres, using either type of tracheal tube. For the rest, tracheal intubation was achieved using backward pressure, except in one patient from the ETT group. The incidence of successful tracheal intubation was nearly identical with either type of ETT. Conclusion: Successful tracheal intubation can be achieved in 96% of cases using adjusting manoeuvres. The nature of the tracheal tubes did not influence the success rate.

KW - Adjusting manoeuvres

KW - Air-Q intubating laryngeal mask

KW - Armoured tracheal tube

KW - Pogo scoring

KW - Tracheal intubation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862684528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862684528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 157

EP - 160

JO - Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 1027-9148

IS - 3

ER -