Evaluation of nondestructive testing data using AASHTO and WESDEF backcalculation approaches

H. F. Hassan, R. M. Mousa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper presents an evaluation of the falling weight deflectometer "FWD" testing data using the AASHTO and WESDEF backcalculation procedures. The backcalculated layer moduli and effective structural number "SNeff" of an existing flexible pavement were determined from both procedures. The subgrade modulus of resilient "MR" obtained from WESDEF was found to be about 0.7 to 0.9 the value obtained from AASHTO with factor "C" of 1.0. Modulus values obtained based on CBR tests indicated that AASHTO gives more realistic MR values when the factor "C" is set to 0.33, as recommended by AASHTO for this factor. The analysis also suggests that a similar factor, about 0.43, should be considered with WESDEF to produce MR values comparable with CBR related modulus values. Using WESDEF results without adjustment has led to higher estimate of the SNeff value compared with AASHTO. The difference in SN eff values was examined at various reliability levels and found not to be significant at the 5% significance level when a reliability level up to 90% is considered. Beyond this level of reliability, the WESDEF produced SN eff difference that is significantly high, reaching up to 0.44 and 0.66 for reliability levels of 95 and 99%, respectively. Based upon this study, AASHTO may be recommended for design of heavy trafficked facilities whereas WESDEF would be suitable for less trafficked projects but in the latter case AASHTO would still be usable.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-93
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Engineering and Applied Science
Volume50
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2003

Fingerprint

Nondestructive examination
Pavements
Testing

Keywords

  • Backcalculation
  • Deflection
  • Modulus of resilient
  • Pavement rehabilitation
  • Structural number

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Evaluation of nondestructive testing data using AASHTO and WESDEF backcalculation approaches. / Hassan, H. F.; Mousa, R. M.

In: Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, Vol. 50, No. 1, 02.2003, p. 75-93.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c45b770cdb6348388bd2e1e5c3bf5872,
title = "Evaluation of nondestructive testing data using AASHTO and WESDEF backcalculation approaches",
abstract = "This paper presents an evaluation of the falling weight deflectometer {"}FWD{"} testing data using the AASHTO and WESDEF backcalculation procedures. The backcalculated layer moduli and effective structural number {"}SNeff{"} of an existing flexible pavement were determined from both procedures. The subgrade modulus of resilient {"}MR{"} obtained from WESDEF was found to be about 0.7 to 0.9 the value obtained from AASHTO with factor {"}C{"} of 1.0. Modulus values obtained based on CBR tests indicated that AASHTO gives more realistic MR values when the factor {"}C{"} is set to 0.33, as recommended by AASHTO for this factor. The analysis also suggests that a similar factor, about 0.43, should be considered with WESDEF to produce MR values comparable with CBR related modulus values. Using WESDEF results without adjustment has led to higher estimate of the SNeff value compared with AASHTO. The difference in SN eff values was examined at various reliability levels and found not to be significant at the 5{\%} significance level when a reliability level up to 90{\%} is considered. Beyond this level of reliability, the WESDEF produced SN eff difference that is significantly high, reaching up to 0.44 and 0.66 for reliability levels of 95 and 99{\%}, respectively. Based upon this study, AASHTO may be recommended for design of heavy trafficked facilities whereas WESDEF would be suitable for less trafficked projects but in the latter case AASHTO would still be usable.",
keywords = "Backcalculation, Deflection, Modulus of resilient, Pavement rehabilitation, Structural number",
author = "Hassan, {H. F.} and Mousa, {R. M.}",
year = "2003",
month = "2",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "75--93",
journal = "Journal of Engineering and Applied Science",
issn = "1110-1903",
publisher = "Cairo University",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of nondestructive testing data using AASHTO and WESDEF backcalculation approaches

AU - Hassan, H. F.

AU - Mousa, R. M.

PY - 2003/2

Y1 - 2003/2

N2 - This paper presents an evaluation of the falling weight deflectometer "FWD" testing data using the AASHTO and WESDEF backcalculation procedures. The backcalculated layer moduli and effective structural number "SNeff" of an existing flexible pavement were determined from both procedures. The subgrade modulus of resilient "MR" obtained from WESDEF was found to be about 0.7 to 0.9 the value obtained from AASHTO with factor "C" of 1.0. Modulus values obtained based on CBR tests indicated that AASHTO gives more realistic MR values when the factor "C" is set to 0.33, as recommended by AASHTO for this factor. The analysis also suggests that a similar factor, about 0.43, should be considered with WESDEF to produce MR values comparable with CBR related modulus values. Using WESDEF results without adjustment has led to higher estimate of the SNeff value compared with AASHTO. The difference in SN eff values was examined at various reliability levels and found not to be significant at the 5% significance level when a reliability level up to 90% is considered. Beyond this level of reliability, the WESDEF produced SN eff difference that is significantly high, reaching up to 0.44 and 0.66 for reliability levels of 95 and 99%, respectively. Based upon this study, AASHTO may be recommended for design of heavy trafficked facilities whereas WESDEF would be suitable for less trafficked projects but in the latter case AASHTO would still be usable.

AB - This paper presents an evaluation of the falling weight deflectometer "FWD" testing data using the AASHTO and WESDEF backcalculation procedures. The backcalculated layer moduli and effective structural number "SNeff" of an existing flexible pavement were determined from both procedures. The subgrade modulus of resilient "MR" obtained from WESDEF was found to be about 0.7 to 0.9 the value obtained from AASHTO with factor "C" of 1.0. Modulus values obtained based on CBR tests indicated that AASHTO gives more realistic MR values when the factor "C" is set to 0.33, as recommended by AASHTO for this factor. The analysis also suggests that a similar factor, about 0.43, should be considered with WESDEF to produce MR values comparable with CBR related modulus values. Using WESDEF results without adjustment has led to higher estimate of the SNeff value compared with AASHTO. The difference in SN eff values was examined at various reliability levels and found not to be significant at the 5% significance level when a reliability level up to 90% is considered. Beyond this level of reliability, the WESDEF produced SN eff difference that is significantly high, reaching up to 0.44 and 0.66 for reliability levels of 95 and 99%, respectively. Based upon this study, AASHTO may be recommended for design of heavy trafficked facilities whereas WESDEF would be suitable for less trafficked projects but in the latter case AASHTO would still be usable.

KW - Backcalculation

KW - Deflection

KW - Modulus of resilient

KW - Pavement rehabilitation

KW - Structural number

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0043238684&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0043238684&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0043238684

VL - 50

SP - 75

EP - 93

JO - Journal of Engineering and Applied Science

JF - Journal of Engineering and Applied Science

SN - 1110-1903

IS - 1

ER -