TY - GEN
T1 - Energy-efficient envelope design for residential buildings
T2 - 2017 Smart Cities Symposium Prague, SCSP 2017
AU - Al-Saadi, Saleh N.J.
AU - Al-Jabri, Khalifa S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 IEEE.
PY - 2017/7/10
Y1 - 2017/7/10
N2 - This study summarizes the results from a simulation study for a typical villa in Muscat, a hot humid city in Oman. A housing model was generated in the DesignBuilder software. The model was compared against real utility readings before it was further taken for the energy calculations. Different thermal characteristics of building envelope including the heat transmission, thermal mass, solar heat gain through windows and air infiltration were evaluated. Many energy-efficient envelope design options were generated. Sensitivity analysis was then performed to narrow down the design parameters to the most significant parameters. From the sensitivity analysis, it was found that no significant energy savings are achieved beyond 15 cm of thermal insulation for both walls and roof. The solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC) was found more significant than the U-values of the glazing. It was also found that the house should be air tight as the air infiltration was significant. External shading was advantageous too in hot climates. A brute force optimization approach was then carried out using unsubsidized and subsidized energy cost scenarios. A maximum energy savings of 26.7% and a minimum energy savings of 18.4% were achieved for both energy cost scenarios. For maximum energy savings, 15 cm insulation for walls and roof, a double low-e selective tinted glazing, 100 cm of overhang shading were found to be the optimal design. The optimal designs for minimum life cycle cost were, however, different for the two energy cost scenarios. For unsubsidized energy cost, 10 cm insulation for walls and roof, a single green tinted glazing, and 100 cm of overhang shading were found to be the optimal design. For subsidized energy cost, a 7.5 cm for wall and roof are the optimal while other parameters are similar to the unsubsidized case. The results from the study will help both the policy makers, designers, and owners to select their optimal designs based on different cost functions.
AB - This study summarizes the results from a simulation study for a typical villa in Muscat, a hot humid city in Oman. A housing model was generated in the DesignBuilder software. The model was compared against real utility readings before it was further taken for the energy calculations. Different thermal characteristics of building envelope including the heat transmission, thermal mass, solar heat gain through windows and air infiltration were evaluated. Many energy-efficient envelope design options were generated. Sensitivity analysis was then performed to narrow down the design parameters to the most significant parameters. From the sensitivity analysis, it was found that no significant energy savings are achieved beyond 15 cm of thermal insulation for both walls and roof. The solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC) was found more significant than the U-values of the glazing. It was also found that the house should be air tight as the air infiltration was significant. External shading was advantageous too in hot climates. A brute force optimization approach was then carried out using unsubsidized and subsidized energy cost scenarios. A maximum energy savings of 26.7% and a minimum energy savings of 18.4% were achieved for both energy cost scenarios. For maximum energy savings, 15 cm insulation for walls and roof, a double low-e selective tinted glazing, 100 cm of overhang shading were found to be the optimal design. The optimal designs for minimum life cycle cost were, however, different for the two energy cost scenarios. For unsubsidized energy cost, 10 cm insulation for walls and roof, a single green tinted glazing, and 100 cm of overhang shading were found to be the optimal design. For subsidized energy cost, a 7.5 cm for wall and roof are the optimal while other parameters are similar to the unsubsidized case. The results from the study will help both the policy makers, designers, and owners to select their optimal designs based on different cost functions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027689282&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027689282&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/SCSP.2017.7973853
DO - 10.1109/SCSP.2017.7973853
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85027689282
T3 - 2017 Smart Cities Symposium Prague, SCSP 2017 - IEEE Proceedings
BT - 2017 Smart Cities Symposium Prague, SCSP 2017 - IEEE Proceedings
A2 - Ruzicka, Jiri
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Y2 - 25 May 2017 through 26 May 2017
ER -
