Effluent discharge into tidal waters: Optimal or economic strategy?

Anton Purnama, Anthony Kay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A variety of strategies, based on the use of holding tanks and variable discharge rates, are presented for reducing environmental impact and minimising economic cost of a continuous discharge of a conserved pollutant into a tidal estuary. The environmental objectives are to avoid intermittently high pollutant concentrations downstream of the outfall and to prevent upstream transport of pollutants on the flood tide. The first of these can be achieved by varying the discharge proportionally to the flow speed in the estuary, while the second is achieved by only discharging during the early part of the ebb tide. Operating costs can be reduced by pumping the discharge intermittently, especially if there is an overnight period of cheap energy costs. However, an intermittent discharge strategy will result in elevated pollution levels unless the discharge period is confined to the ebb tide. Intermittent discharges may also incur increased capital costs in terms of the need to provide a larger holding tank.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)601-624
Number of pages24
JournalEnvironmetrics
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1999

Fingerprint

Tides
Tide
Effluents
Pollutants
Economics
Estuaries
effluent
Water
Costs
economics
Outfalls
tide
Operating costs
Environmental impact
cost
Pollution
estuary
pollutant
Strategy
tidal water

Keywords

  • Ebb-staged
  • Effluent
  • Estuary
  • Far-field concentration
  • Holding tank
  • Pollution minimisation
  • Tidal flow
  • Variable discharge

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Statistics and Probability

Cite this

Effluent discharge into tidal waters : Optimal or economic strategy? / Purnama, Anton; Kay, Anthony.

In: Environmetrics, Vol. 10, No. 5, 09.1999, p. 601-624.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{883ebb3045574a8593bc67da3e6c1820,
title = "Effluent discharge into tidal waters: Optimal or economic strategy?",
abstract = "A variety of strategies, based on the use of holding tanks and variable discharge rates, are presented for reducing environmental impact and minimising economic cost of a continuous discharge of a conserved pollutant into a tidal estuary. The environmental objectives are to avoid intermittently high pollutant concentrations downstream of the outfall and to prevent upstream transport of pollutants on the flood tide. The first of these can be achieved by varying the discharge proportionally to the flow speed in the estuary, while the second is achieved by only discharging during the early part of the ebb tide. Operating costs can be reduced by pumping the discharge intermittently, especially if there is an overnight period of cheap energy costs. However, an intermittent discharge strategy will result in elevated pollution levels unless the discharge period is confined to the ebb tide. Intermittent discharges may also incur increased capital costs in terms of the need to provide a larger holding tank.",
keywords = "Ebb-staged, Effluent, Estuary, Far-field concentration, Holding tank, Pollution minimisation, Tidal flow, Variable discharge",
author = "Anton Purnama and Anthony Kay",
year = "1999",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1099-095X(199909/10)10:5<601::AID-ENV375>3.0.CO;2-Q",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "601--624",
journal = "Environmetrics",
issn = "1180-4009",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effluent discharge into tidal waters

T2 - Optimal or economic strategy?

AU - Purnama, Anton

AU - Kay, Anthony

PY - 1999/9

Y1 - 1999/9

N2 - A variety of strategies, based on the use of holding tanks and variable discharge rates, are presented for reducing environmental impact and minimising economic cost of a continuous discharge of a conserved pollutant into a tidal estuary. The environmental objectives are to avoid intermittently high pollutant concentrations downstream of the outfall and to prevent upstream transport of pollutants on the flood tide. The first of these can be achieved by varying the discharge proportionally to the flow speed in the estuary, while the second is achieved by only discharging during the early part of the ebb tide. Operating costs can be reduced by pumping the discharge intermittently, especially if there is an overnight period of cheap energy costs. However, an intermittent discharge strategy will result in elevated pollution levels unless the discharge period is confined to the ebb tide. Intermittent discharges may also incur increased capital costs in terms of the need to provide a larger holding tank.

AB - A variety of strategies, based on the use of holding tanks and variable discharge rates, are presented for reducing environmental impact and minimising economic cost of a continuous discharge of a conserved pollutant into a tidal estuary. The environmental objectives are to avoid intermittently high pollutant concentrations downstream of the outfall and to prevent upstream transport of pollutants on the flood tide. The first of these can be achieved by varying the discharge proportionally to the flow speed in the estuary, while the second is achieved by only discharging during the early part of the ebb tide. Operating costs can be reduced by pumping the discharge intermittently, especially if there is an overnight period of cheap energy costs. However, an intermittent discharge strategy will result in elevated pollution levels unless the discharge period is confined to the ebb tide. Intermittent discharges may also incur increased capital costs in terms of the need to provide a larger holding tank.

KW - Ebb-staged

KW - Effluent

KW - Estuary

KW - Far-field concentration

KW - Holding tank

KW - Pollution minimisation

KW - Tidal flow

KW - Variable discharge

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032871967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032871967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1099-095X(199909/10)10:5<601::AID-ENV375>3.0.CO;2-Q

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1099-095X(199909/10)10:5<601::AID-ENV375>3.0.CO;2-Q

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032871967

VL - 10

SP - 601

EP - 624

JO - Environmetrics

JF - Environmetrics

SN - 1180-4009

IS - 5

ER -