Effects of Anaesthetic Agents on Pressor Response to β‐Blockers in the Rat

ALY ABDELRAHMAN, YONG‐XIANG ‐X WANG, CATHERINE C.Y. PANG

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Abstract— It has been shown that paradoxical pressor response to a β‐adrenoceptor antagonist occurs in conscious rats pretreated with an α‐adrenoceptor antagonist. This study examines the influence of anaesthetic agents on mean arterial pressure (MAP) response to a η‐blocker. Cumulative dose‐response curves of propranolol (non‐selective), ICI 118,551 (β2‐selective) and atenolol (β1‐selective) were constructed in phentolamine‐treated rats anaesthetized with urethane, pentobarbitone or halothane. I.v. injections of all three β‐blockers caused dose‐dependent increases in MAP in urethane‐anaesthetized rats. In halothane‐anaesthetized rats, propranolol and atenolol did not alter MAP while ICI 118,551 caused a small dose‐dependent increase in MAP. In the presence of pentobarbitone, none of the β‐blockers raised MAP. In the second series of experiments, a single i.v. bolus dose of propranolol was given in phentolamine‐treated rats anaesthetized with pentobarbitone, amobarbitone, ketamine or chloralose. Propranolol did not affect MAP in rats anaesthetized with pentobarbitone, amobarbitone and chloralose but it partially reversed the hypotensive effect of phentolamine in ketamine‐anaesthetized rats. In the third series, propranolol or atenolol was i.v. injected in pentobarbitone‐anaesthetized rats treated with both phentolamine and adrenaline. Both propranolol and atenolol raised MAP. Our results show that anaesthetic agents differentially affect the MAP response to a β‐blocker. 1992 Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)34-38
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Anesthetics
Arterial Pressure
Propranolol
Atenolol
Pentobarbital
Chloralose
Phentolamine
Adrenergic Receptors
Urethane
Ketamine
Halothane
Epinephrine
Injections

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Pharmaceutical Science

Cite this

Effects of Anaesthetic Agents on Pressor Response to β‐Blockers in the Rat. / ABDELRAHMAN, ALY; WANG, YONG‐XIANG ‐X; PANG, CATHERINE C.Y.

In: Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Vol. 44, No. 1, 1992, p. 34-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ABDELRAHMAN, ALY ; WANG, YONG‐XIANG ‐X ; PANG, CATHERINE C.Y. / Effects of Anaesthetic Agents on Pressor Response to β‐Blockers in the Rat. In: Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 1992 ; Vol. 44, No. 1. pp. 34-38.
@article{6f0a0030427344c6b35ea4304f14f3b5,
title = "Effects of Anaesthetic Agents on Pressor Response to β‐Blockers in the Rat",
abstract = "Abstract— It has been shown that paradoxical pressor response to a β‐adrenoceptor antagonist occurs in conscious rats pretreated with an α‐adrenoceptor antagonist. This study examines the influence of anaesthetic agents on mean arterial pressure (MAP) response to a η‐blocker. Cumulative dose‐response curves of propranolol (non‐selective), ICI 118,551 (β2‐selective) and atenolol (β1‐selective) were constructed in phentolamine‐treated rats anaesthetized with urethane, pentobarbitone or halothane. I.v. injections of all three β‐blockers caused dose‐dependent increases in MAP in urethane‐anaesthetized rats. In halothane‐anaesthetized rats, propranolol and atenolol did not alter MAP while ICI 118,551 caused a small dose‐dependent increase in MAP. In the presence of pentobarbitone, none of the β‐blockers raised MAP. In the second series of experiments, a single i.v. bolus dose of propranolol was given in phentolamine‐treated rats anaesthetized with pentobarbitone, amobarbitone, ketamine or chloralose. Propranolol did not affect MAP in rats anaesthetized with pentobarbitone, amobarbitone and chloralose but it partially reversed the hypotensive effect of phentolamine in ketamine‐anaesthetized rats. In the third series, propranolol or atenolol was i.v. injected in pentobarbitone‐anaesthetized rats treated with both phentolamine and adrenaline. Both propranolol and atenolol raised MAP. Our results show that anaesthetic agents differentially affect the MAP response to a β‐blocker. 1992 Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain",
author = "ALY ABDELRAHMAN and WANG, {YONG‐XIANG ‐X} and PANG, {CATHERINE C.Y.}",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1111/j.2042-7158.1992.tb14359.x",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "34--38",
journal = "Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology",
issn = "0022-3573",
publisher = "Pharmaceutical Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of Anaesthetic Agents on Pressor Response to β‐Blockers in the Rat

AU - ABDELRAHMAN, ALY

AU - WANG, YONG‐XIANG ‐X

AU - PANG, CATHERINE C.Y.

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - Abstract— It has been shown that paradoxical pressor response to a β‐adrenoceptor antagonist occurs in conscious rats pretreated with an α‐adrenoceptor antagonist. This study examines the influence of anaesthetic agents on mean arterial pressure (MAP) response to a η‐blocker. Cumulative dose‐response curves of propranolol (non‐selective), ICI 118,551 (β2‐selective) and atenolol (β1‐selective) were constructed in phentolamine‐treated rats anaesthetized with urethane, pentobarbitone or halothane. I.v. injections of all three β‐blockers caused dose‐dependent increases in MAP in urethane‐anaesthetized rats. In halothane‐anaesthetized rats, propranolol and atenolol did not alter MAP while ICI 118,551 caused a small dose‐dependent increase in MAP. In the presence of pentobarbitone, none of the β‐blockers raised MAP. In the second series of experiments, a single i.v. bolus dose of propranolol was given in phentolamine‐treated rats anaesthetized with pentobarbitone, amobarbitone, ketamine or chloralose. Propranolol did not affect MAP in rats anaesthetized with pentobarbitone, amobarbitone and chloralose but it partially reversed the hypotensive effect of phentolamine in ketamine‐anaesthetized rats. In the third series, propranolol or atenolol was i.v. injected in pentobarbitone‐anaesthetized rats treated with both phentolamine and adrenaline. Both propranolol and atenolol raised MAP. Our results show that anaesthetic agents differentially affect the MAP response to a β‐blocker. 1992 Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain

AB - Abstract— It has been shown that paradoxical pressor response to a β‐adrenoceptor antagonist occurs in conscious rats pretreated with an α‐adrenoceptor antagonist. This study examines the influence of anaesthetic agents on mean arterial pressure (MAP) response to a η‐blocker. Cumulative dose‐response curves of propranolol (non‐selective), ICI 118,551 (β2‐selective) and atenolol (β1‐selective) were constructed in phentolamine‐treated rats anaesthetized with urethane, pentobarbitone or halothane. I.v. injections of all three β‐blockers caused dose‐dependent increases in MAP in urethane‐anaesthetized rats. In halothane‐anaesthetized rats, propranolol and atenolol did not alter MAP while ICI 118,551 caused a small dose‐dependent increase in MAP. In the presence of pentobarbitone, none of the β‐blockers raised MAP. In the second series of experiments, a single i.v. bolus dose of propranolol was given in phentolamine‐treated rats anaesthetized with pentobarbitone, amobarbitone, ketamine or chloralose. Propranolol did not affect MAP in rats anaesthetized with pentobarbitone, amobarbitone and chloralose but it partially reversed the hypotensive effect of phentolamine in ketamine‐anaesthetized rats. In the third series, propranolol or atenolol was i.v. injected in pentobarbitone‐anaesthetized rats treated with both phentolamine and adrenaline. Both propranolol and atenolol raised MAP. Our results show that anaesthetic agents differentially affect the MAP response to a β‐blocker. 1992 Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026567499&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026567499&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1992.tb14359.x

DO - 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1992.tb14359.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 1350625

AN - SCOPUS:0026567499

VL - 44

SP - 34

EP - 38

JO - Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology

JF - Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology

SN - 0022-3573

IS - 1

ER -