### Abstract

Tests were conducted on two partially pre-stressed concrete solid beams subjected to combined loading of bending, shear and torsion. The beams were designed using the Direct Design Method which is based on the Lower Bound Theorem of the Theory of Plasticity. Both beams were of 300 × 300 mm cross-section and 3.8 m length. The two main variables studied were the ratio of the maximum shear stress due to the twisting moment, to the shear stress arising from the shear force, which was varied between 0.69 and 3.04, and the ratio of the maximum twisting moment to the maximum bending moment which was varied between 0.26 and 1.19. The required reinforcement from the Direct Design Method was compared with requirements from the ACI and the BSI codes. It was found that, in the case of bending dominance, the required longitudinal reinforcements from all methods were close to each other while the BSI required much larger transverse reinforcement. In the case of torsion dominance, the BSI method required much larger longitudinal and transverse reinforcement than the both the ACI and the DDM methods. The difference in the transverse reinforcement is more pronounce. Experimental investigation showed good agreement between design and experimental failure loads of the beams designed using the Direct Design Method. Both beams failed within an acceptable range of the design loads and underwent ductile behaviour up to failure. The results indicate that the Direct Design Method can be successfully used to design partially prestressed concrete solid beams which cater for the combined effect of bending, shear and torsion loads.

Original language | English |
---|---|

Pages (from-to) | 741-771 |

Number of pages | 31 |

Journal | Structural Engineering and Mechanics |

Volume | 27 |

Issue number | 6 |

Publication status | Published - Dec 20 2007 |

### Fingerprint

### Keywords

- Beams
- Bending
- Concrete structures
- Direct design method
- Partially prestressed concrete
- Prestressed concrete
- Shear
- Torsion

### ASJC Scopus subject areas

- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Building and Construction
- Mechanics of Materials
- Mechanical Engineering

### Cite this

*Structural Engineering and Mechanics*,

*27*(6), 741-771.

**Direct design of partially prestressed concrete solid beams.** / Alnuaimi, A. S.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

*Structural Engineering and Mechanics*, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 741-771.

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Direct design of partially prestressed concrete solid beams

AU - Alnuaimi, A. S.

PY - 2007/12/20

Y1 - 2007/12/20

N2 - Tests were conducted on two partially pre-stressed concrete solid beams subjected to combined loading of bending, shear and torsion. The beams were designed using the Direct Design Method which is based on the Lower Bound Theorem of the Theory of Plasticity. Both beams were of 300 × 300 mm cross-section and 3.8 m length. The two main variables studied were the ratio of the maximum shear stress due to the twisting moment, to the shear stress arising from the shear force, which was varied between 0.69 and 3.04, and the ratio of the maximum twisting moment to the maximum bending moment which was varied between 0.26 and 1.19. The required reinforcement from the Direct Design Method was compared with requirements from the ACI and the BSI codes. It was found that, in the case of bending dominance, the required longitudinal reinforcements from all methods were close to each other while the BSI required much larger transverse reinforcement. In the case of torsion dominance, the BSI method required much larger longitudinal and transverse reinforcement than the both the ACI and the DDM methods. The difference in the transverse reinforcement is more pronounce. Experimental investigation showed good agreement between design and experimental failure loads of the beams designed using the Direct Design Method. Both beams failed within an acceptable range of the design loads and underwent ductile behaviour up to failure. The results indicate that the Direct Design Method can be successfully used to design partially prestressed concrete solid beams which cater for the combined effect of bending, shear and torsion loads.

AB - Tests were conducted on two partially pre-stressed concrete solid beams subjected to combined loading of bending, shear and torsion. The beams were designed using the Direct Design Method which is based on the Lower Bound Theorem of the Theory of Plasticity. Both beams were of 300 × 300 mm cross-section and 3.8 m length. The two main variables studied were the ratio of the maximum shear stress due to the twisting moment, to the shear stress arising from the shear force, which was varied between 0.69 and 3.04, and the ratio of the maximum twisting moment to the maximum bending moment which was varied between 0.26 and 1.19. The required reinforcement from the Direct Design Method was compared with requirements from the ACI and the BSI codes. It was found that, in the case of bending dominance, the required longitudinal reinforcements from all methods were close to each other while the BSI required much larger transverse reinforcement. In the case of torsion dominance, the BSI method required much larger longitudinal and transverse reinforcement than the both the ACI and the DDM methods. The difference in the transverse reinforcement is more pronounce. Experimental investigation showed good agreement between design and experimental failure loads of the beams designed using the Direct Design Method. Both beams failed within an acceptable range of the design loads and underwent ductile behaviour up to failure. The results indicate that the Direct Design Method can be successfully used to design partially prestressed concrete solid beams which cater for the combined effect of bending, shear and torsion loads.

KW - Beams

KW - Bending

KW - Concrete structures

KW - Direct design method

KW - Partially prestressed concrete

KW - Prestressed concrete

KW - Shear

KW - Torsion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38849138721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38849138721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 741

EP - 771

JO - Structural Engineering and Mechanics

JF - Structural Engineering and Mechanics

SN - 1225-4568

IS - 6

ER -