Diagnosis of adult chronic rhinosinusitis

Can nasal endoscopy predict intrasinus disease?

Arif Ali Kolethekkat, Roshna Rose Paul, Mary Kurien, Shyam Kumar, Rashid Al Abri, Kurien Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To define the role of endoscopic evaluation of middle meatus in adult patients clinically diagnosed to have chronic rhinosinusitis and its ability to predict intra-sinus mucosal involvement as compared to CT scan. Methods: This prospective analytical study was conducted on consecutive patients with diagnosis of chronic rhino-sinusitis who were symptomatic and fulfilled the American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Task Force criteria. The patients were enrolled prospectively and were subjected to rigid diagnostic nasal endoscopy and classified as defined by the revised Sinus Allergy Health Partnership Task Force criteria. The patients then underwent non contrast CT sinuses on the same day. Results were analyzed as a diagnostic test evaluation using CT as a gold standard. Results: Among the 75 study patients with symptom based chronic rhino-sinusitis, nasal endoscopy was abnormal in 65 patients (87%). Of these patients, 60/65 (92%) showed positive findings on CT scan. Ten patients had normal endoscopy, of these 6/10 (60%) had abnormal CT scan. Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic nasal endoscopy against CT scan were 91% (95% CI: 81-97) and 44% (95% CI: 14-79), respectively. The likelihood ratio for positive nasal endoscopy to diagnose chronic rhino-sinusitis was 1.6 and the likelihood ratio to rule out chronic rhino-sinusitis when endoscopy was negative was 0.2. Conclusion: Nasal endoscopy is a valid and objective diagnostic tool in the work up of patients with symptomatic chronic rhinosinusitis. When clinical suspicion is low (90% of patients when clinical suspicion is high (88%) as defined in this study by AAO-HNS Task Force criteria. Negative endoscopy, however, does not totally exclude the sinus disease in patients fulfilling task force criteria. CT scan may be needed on follow-up if there is clinical suspicion in 10% of these patients who are negative on endoscopy if symptoms persists. It is thus possible to reduce the number of CT scans if patients are carefully selected based on clinical criteria and endoscopy is done initially as part of their evaluation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)427-431
Number of pages5
JournalOman Medical Journal
Volume28
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Nose
Endoscopy
Sinusitis
Advisory Committees
Otolaryngology
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Hypersensitivity
Neck
Head
Prospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Chronic
  • CT scan
  • Endoscopy
  • Likelihood ratio
  • Sensitivity
  • Sinusitis
  • Specificity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Diagnosis of adult chronic rhinosinusitis : Can nasal endoscopy predict intrasinus disease? / Kolethekkat, Arif Ali; Paul, Roshna Rose; Kurien, Mary; Kumar, Shyam; Al Abri, Rashid; Thomas, Kurien.

In: Oman Medical Journal, Vol. 28, No. 6, 2013, p. 427-431.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kolethekkat, Arif Ali ; Paul, Roshna Rose ; Kurien, Mary ; Kumar, Shyam ; Al Abri, Rashid ; Thomas, Kurien. / Diagnosis of adult chronic rhinosinusitis : Can nasal endoscopy predict intrasinus disease?. In: Oman Medical Journal. 2013 ; Vol. 28, No. 6. pp. 427-431.
@article{1c8d891cc8024fcd87a4454c92e43a78,
title = "Diagnosis of adult chronic rhinosinusitis: Can nasal endoscopy predict intrasinus disease?",
abstract = "Objectives: To define the role of endoscopic evaluation of middle meatus in adult patients clinically diagnosed to have chronic rhinosinusitis and its ability to predict intra-sinus mucosal involvement as compared to CT scan. Methods: This prospective analytical study was conducted on consecutive patients with diagnosis of chronic rhino-sinusitis who were symptomatic and fulfilled the American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Task Force criteria. The patients were enrolled prospectively and were subjected to rigid diagnostic nasal endoscopy and classified as defined by the revised Sinus Allergy Health Partnership Task Force criteria. The patients then underwent non contrast CT sinuses on the same day. Results were analyzed as a diagnostic test evaluation using CT as a gold standard. Results: Among the 75 study patients with symptom based chronic rhino-sinusitis, nasal endoscopy was abnormal in 65 patients (87{\%}). Of these patients, 60/65 (92{\%}) showed positive findings on CT scan. Ten patients had normal endoscopy, of these 6/10 (60{\%}) had abnormal CT scan. Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic nasal endoscopy against CT scan were 91{\%} (95{\%} CI: 81-97) and 44{\%} (95{\%} CI: 14-79), respectively. The likelihood ratio for positive nasal endoscopy to diagnose chronic rhino-sinusitis was 1.6 and the likelihood ratio to rule out chronic rhino-sinusitis when endoscopy was negative was 0.2. Conclusion: Nasal endoscopy is a valid and objective diagnostic tool in the work up of patients with symptomatic chronic rhinosinusitis. When clinical suspicion is low (90{\%} of patients when clinical suspicion is high (88{\%}) as defined in this study by AAO-HNS Task Force criteria. Negative endoscopy, however, does not totally exclude the sinus disease in patients fulfilling task force criteria. CT scan may be needed on follow-up if there is clinical suspicion in 10{\%} of these patients who are negative on endoscopy if symptoms persists. It is thus possible to reduce the number of CT scans if patients are carefully selected based on clinical criteria and endoscopy is done initially as part of their evaluation.",
keywords = "Chronic, CT scan, Endoscopy, Likelihood ratio, Sensitivity, Sinusitis, Specificity",
author = "Kolethekkat, {Arif Ali} and Paul, {Roshna Rose} and Mary Kurien and Shyam Kumar and {Al Abri}, Rashid and Kurien Thomas",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.5001/omj.2013.120",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "427--431",
journal = "Oman Medical Journal",
issn = "1999-768X",
publisher = "Oman Medical Specialty Board",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnosis of adult chronic rhinosinusitis

T2 - Can nasal endoscopy predict intrasinus disease?

AU - Kolethekkat, Arif Ali

AU - Paul, Roshna Rose

AU - Kurien, Mary

AU - Kumar, Shyam

AU - Al Abri, Rashid

AU - Thomas, Kurien

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Objectives: To define the role of endoscopic evaluation of middle meatus in adult patients clinically diagnosed to have chronic rhinosinusitis and its ability to predict intra-sinus mucosal involvement as compared to CT scan. Methods: This prospective analytical study was conducted on consecutive patients with diagnosis of chronic rhino-sinusitis who were symptomatic and fulfilled the American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Task Force criteria. The patients were enrolled prospectively and were subjected to rigid diagnostic nasal endoscopy and classified as defined by the revised Sinus Allergy Health Partnership Task Force criteria. The patients then underwent non contrast CT sinuses on the same day. Results were analyzed as a diagnostic test evaluation using CT as a gold standard. Results: Among the 75 study patients with symptom based chronic rhino-sinusitis, nasal endoscopy was abnormal in 65 patients (87%). Of these patients, 60/65 (92%) showed positive findings on CT scan. Ten patients had normal endoscopy, of these 6/10 (60%) had abnormal CT scan. Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic nasal endoscopy against CT scan were 91% (95% CI: 81-97) and 44% (95% CI: 14-79), respectively. The likelihood ratio for positive nasal endoscopy to diagnose chronic rhino-sinusitis was 1.6 and the likelihood ratio to rule out chronic rhino-sinusitis when endoscopy was negative was 0.2. Conclusion: Nasal endoscopy is a valid and objective diagnostic tool in the work up of patients with symptomatic chronic rhinosinusitis. When clinical suspicion is low (90% of patients when clinical suspicion is high (88%) as defined in this study by AAO-HNS Task Force criteria. Negative endoscopy, however, does not totally exclude the sinus disease in patients fulfilling task force criteria. CT scan may be needed on follow-up if there is clinical suspicion in 10% of these patients who are negative on endoscopy if symptoms persists. It is thus possible to reduce the number of CT scans if patients are carefully selected based on clinical criteria and endoscopy is done initially as part of their evaluation.

AB - Objectives: To define the role of endoscopic evaluation of middle meatus in adult patients clinically diagnosed to have chronic rhinosinusitis and its ability to predict intra-sinus mucosal involvement as compared to CT scan. Methods: This prospective analytical study was conducted on consecutive patients with diagnosis of chronic rhino-sinusitis who were symptomatic and fulfilled the American Academy of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Task Force criteria. The patients were enrolled prospectively and were subjected to rigid diagnostic nasal endoscopy and classified as defined by the revised Sinus Allergy Health Partnership Task Force criteria. The patients then underwent non contrast CT sinuses on the same day. Results were analyzed as a diagnostic test evaluation using CT as a gold standard. Results: Among the 75 study patients with symptom based chronic rhino-sinusitis, nasal endoscopy was abnormal in 65 patients (87%). Of these patients, 60/65 (92%) showed positive findings on CT scan. Ten patients had normal endoscopy, of these 6/10 (60%) had abnormal CT scan. Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic nasal endoscopy against CT scan were 91% (95% CI: 81-97) and 44% (95% CI: 14-79), respectively. The likelihood ratio for positive nasal endoscopy to diagnose chronic rhino-sinusitis was 1.6 and the likelihood ratio to rule out chronic rhino-sinusitis when endoscopy was negative was 0.2. Conclusion: Nasal endoscopy is a valid and objective diagnostic tool in the work up of patients with symptomatic chronic rhinosinusitis. When clinical suspicion is low (90% of patients when clinical suspicion is high (88%) as defined in this study by AAO-HNS Task Force criteria. Negative endoscopy, however, does not totally exclude the sinus disease in patients fulfilling task force criteria. CT scan may be needed on follow-up if there is clinical suspicion in 10% of these patients who are negative on endoscopy if symptoms persists. It is thus possible to reduce the number of CT scans if patients are carefully selected based on clinical criteria and endoscopy is done initially as part of their evaluation.

KW - Chronic

KW - CT scan

KW - Endoscopy

KW - Likelihood ratio

KW - Sensitivity

KW - Sinusitis

KW - Specificity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887371372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887371372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5001/omj.2013.120

DO - 10.5001/omj.2013.120

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 427

EP - 431

JO - Oman Medical Journal

JF - Oman Medical Journal

SN - 1999-768X

IS - 6

ER -