Deeper integration or wider integration? The case of gulf cooperation council

Houcine Boughanmi, Ahmed Al-Shammakhi, Alessandro Antimiani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We empirically evaluate whether fostering trade partnership within the region is a better economic course of action for the Gulf Cooperation Council than engaging into preferential trade arrangements with well-established trade blocs outside the region. We use the 8.1 version of Global Trade Analysis Project to analyze four scenarios representing various Gulf Cooperation Council trade integration paths, taking into consideration the issue of non-Tariff Barriers and trade facilitation measures. Results indicate that the Gulf Cooperation Council gain from lifting tariffs and non-tariff barriers on trade with the Greater Arab Free Trade Area subgroups and with the European Union is limited unless such barrier lifting is complemented with trade facilitation measures. With trade facilitation, the full completion of Greater Arab Free Trade Area scenario yields the highest welfare gain for the Gulf Cooperation Council, while the Gulf Cooperation Council-European Union Free Trade Agreement scenario yields positive but smaller gain. The small gain with Gulf Cooperation Council-European Union scenario is explained by the negative terms of trade effects following trade liberalization. These results underscore the importance of deepening Greater Arab Free Trade Area’s scope through introduction of trade facilitation measures as well as measures beyond merchandize trade liberalization.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)206-233
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Economic Integration
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1 2016

Fingerprint

Gulf Cooperation Council
Trade facilitation
Scenarios
Free trade area
European Union
Non-tariff barriers
Trade liberalization
Global trade
Project analysis
Trade blocs
Tariffs
Welfare gains
Economics
Free trade agreements
Terms of trade
Trade integration

Keywords

  • Computable general equilibrium
  • Global trade analysis project
  • Gulf cooperation council
  • MENA
  • Regional integration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

Cite this

Deeper integration or wider integration? The case of gulf cooperation council. / Boughanmi, Houcine; Al-Shammakhi, Ahmed; Antimiani, Alessandro.

In: Journal of Economic Integration, Vol. 31, No. 2, 01.06.2016, p. 206-233.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Boughanmi, Houcine ; Al-Shammakhi, Ahmed ; Antimiani, Alessandro. / Deeper integration or wider integration? The case of gulf cooperation council. In: Journal of Economic Integration. 2016 ; Vol. 31, No. 2. pp. 206-233.
@article{b90851ca49de4e2cb542470cdd144790,
title = "Deeper integration or wider integration?: The case of gulf cooperation council",
abstract = "We empirically evaluate whether fostering trade partnership within the region is a better economic course of action for the Gulf Cooperation Council than engaging into preferential trade arrangements with well-established trade blocs outside the region. We use the 8.1 version of Global Trade Analysis Project to analyze four scenarios representing various Gulf Cooperation Council trade integration paths, taking into consideration the issue of non-Tariff Barriers and trade facilitation measures. Results indicate that the Gulf Cooperation Council gain from lifting tariffs and non-tariff barriers on trade with the Greater Arab Free Trade Area subgroups and with the European Union is limited unless such barrier lifting is complemented with trade facilitation measures. With trade facilitation, the full completion of Greater Arab Free Trade Area scenario yields the highest welfare gain for the Gulf Cooperation Council, while the Gulf Cooperation Council-European Union Free Trade Agreement scenario yields positive but smaller gain. The small gain with Gulf Cooperation Council-European Union scenario is explained by the negative terms of trade effects following trade liberalization. These results underscore the importance of deepening Greater Arab Free Trade Area’s scope through introduction of trade facilitation measures as well as measures beyond merchandize trade liberalization.",
keywords = "Computable general equilibrium, Global trade analysis project, Gulf cooperation council, MENA, Regional integration",
author = "Houcine Boughanmi and Ahmed Al-Shammakhi and Alessandro Antimiani",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.11130/jei.2016.31.2.206",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "206--233",
journal = "Journal of Economic Integration",
issn = "1225-651X",
publisher = "Sejong University",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deeper integration or wider integration?

T2 - The case of gulf cooperation council

AU - Boughanmi, Houcine

AU - Al-Shammakhi, Ahmed

AU - Antimiani, Alessandro

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - We empirically evaluate whether fostering trade partnership within the region is a better economic course of action for the Gulf Cooperation Council than engaging into preferential trade arrangements with well-established trade blocs outside the region. We use the 8.1 version of Global Trade Analysis Project to analyze four scenarios representing various Gulf Cooperation Council trade integration paths, taking into consideration the issue of non-Tariff Barriers and trade facilitation measures. Results indicate that the Gulf Cooperation Council gain from lifting tariffs and non-tariff barriers on trade with the Greater Arab Free Trade Area subgroups and with the European Union is limited unless such barrier lifting is complemented with trade facilitation measures. With trade facilitation, the full completion of Greater Arab Free Trade Area scenario yields the highest welfare gain for the Gulf Cooperation Council, while the Gulf Cooperation Council-European Union Free Trade Agreement scenario yields positive but smaller gain. The small gain with Gulf Cooperation Council-European Union scenario is explained by the negative terms of trade effects following trade liberalization. These results underscore the importance of deepening Greater Arab Free Trade Area’s scope through introduction of trade facilitation measures as well as measures beyond merchandize trade liberalization.

AB - We empirically evaluate whether fostering trade partnership within the region is a better economic course of action for the Gulf Cooperation Council than engaging into preferential trade arrangements with well-established trade blocs outside the region. We use the 8.1 version of Global Trade Analysis Project to analyze four scenarios representing various Gulf Cooperation Council trade integration paths, taking into consideration the issue of non-Tariff Barriers and trade facilitation measures. Results indicate that the Gulf Cooperation Council gain from lifting tariffs and non-tariff barriers on trade with the Greater Arab Free Trade Area subgroups and with the European Union is limited unless such barrier lifting is complemented with trade facilitation measures. With trade facilitation, the full completion of Greater Arab Free Trade Area scenario yields the highest welfare gain for the Gulf Cooperation Council, while the Gulf Cooperation Council-European Union Free Trade Agreement scenario yields positive but smaller gain. The small gain with Gulf Cooperation Council-European Union scenario is explained by the negative terms of trade effects following trade liberalization. These results underscore the importance of deepening Greater Arab Free Trade Area’s scope through introduction of trade facilitation measures as well as measures beyond merchandize trade liberalization.

KW - Computable general equilibrium

KW - Global trade analysis project

KW - Gulf cooperation council

KW - MENA

KW - Regional integration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973160223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973160223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.11130/jei.2016.31.2.206

DO - 10.11130/jei.2016.31.2.206

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84973160223

VL - 31

SP - 206

EP - 233

JO - Journal of Economic Integration

JF - Journal of Economic Integration

SN - 1225-651X

IS - 2

ER -