Crossover and maximal fat oxidation points during running and cycling in sedentary subjects

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare crossover and maximal fat oxidation points during cycling and running in healthy participants. Methods: Maximal oxygen uptake VO2max, maximal aerobic power (MAP) and maximal aerobic velocity (MAV) were assessed in 12 sedentary participants (aged 20.5±1.0 years), using a maximal progressive tests on a cycle ergometer and on a treadmill. Participants performed in random sequence, two submaximal graded exercise tests on a cycle ergometer (CE) and on a treadmill (TM), based on the measured MAP and MAV respectively. Respiratory parameters, the crossover (COP) and the maximal fat oxidation points (LIPOXmax) were measured during these submaximal protocols. Results: There were no significant mean (±SD) differences in COP (CE: 46.4±4.9%, TM: 47.4±3.7%; P=0.36) and in LIPOXmax (CE: 40.0±7.4%, TM: 40.2±2.1%; P=0.92) expressed in percentage of VO2max between the two modes of exercise. The metabolic indices obtained on the CE and TM were significantly correlated (COP: r=0.85; P<0.0001 and LIPOXmax: r=0.79; P<0.002). Conclusion: Our data show that COP and LIPOXmax measured during submaximal exercise (based on measured MAP or MAV) were not affected by the choice of ergometer. Both CE and TM yielded accurate and quiet similar metabolic indices that could be used to individualize training in healthy sedentary adults.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)196-203
Number of pages8
JournalScience and Sports
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • Cycle ergometer
  • Indirect calorimetry
  • Metabolic indices
  • Treadmill

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this