TY - JOUR
T1 - Crossover and maximal fat oxidation points during running and cycling in sedentary subjects
AU - Gmada, Nabil
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare crossover and maximal fat oxidation points during cycling and running in healthy participants. Methods: Maximal oxygen uptake VO2max, maximal aerobic power (MAP) and maximal aerobic velocity (MAV) were assessed in 12 sedentary participants (aged 20.5±1.0 years), using a maximal progressive tests on a cycle ergometer and on a treadmill. Participants performed in random sequence, two submaximal graded exercise tests on a cycle ergometer (CE) and on a treadmill (TM), based on the measured MAP and MAV respectively. Respiratory parameters, the crossover (COP) and the maximal fat oxidation points (LIPOXmax) were measured during these submaximal protocols. Results: There were no significant mean (±SD) differences in COP (CE: 46.4±4.9%, TM: 47.4±3.7%; P=0.36) and in LIPOXmax (CE: 40.0±7.4%, TM: 40.2±2.1%; P=0.92) expressed in percentage of VO2max between the two modes of exercise. The metabolic indices obtained on the CE and TM were significantly correlated (COP: r=0.85; P<0.0001 and LIPOXmax: r=0.79; P<0.002). Conclusion: Our data show that COP and LIPOXmax measured during submaximal exercise (based on measured MAP or MAV) were not affected by the choice of ergometer. Both CE and TM yielded accurate and quiet similar metabolic indices that could be used to individualize training in healthy sedentary adults.
AB - Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare crossover and maximal fat oxidation points during cycling and running in healthy participants. Methods: Maximal oxygen uptake VO2max, maximal aerobic power (MAP) and maximal aerobic velocity (MAV) were assessed in 12 sedentary participants (aged 20.5±1.0 years), using a maximal progressive tests on a cycle ergometer and on a treadmill. Participants performed in random sequence, two submaximal graded exercise tests on a cycle ergometer (CE) and on a treadmill (TM), based on the measured MAP and MAV respectively. Respiratory parameters, the crossover (COP) and the maximal fat oxidation points (LIPOXmax) were measured during these submaximal protocols. Results: There were no significant mean (±SD) differences in COP (CE: 46.4±4.9%, TM: 47.4±3.7%; P=0.36) and in LIPOXmax (CE: 40.0±7.4%, TM: 40.2±2.1%; P=0.92) expressed in percentage of VO2max between the two modes of exercise. The metabolic indices obtained on the CE and TM were significantly correlated (COP: r=0.85; P<0.0001 and LIPOXmax: r=0.79; P<0.002). Conclusion: Our data show that COP and LIPOXmax measured during submaximal exercise (based on measured MAP or MAV) were not affected by the choice of ergometer. Both CE and TM yielded accurate and quiet similar metabolic indices that could be used to individualize training in healthy sedentary adults.
KW - Cycle ergometer
KW - Indirect calorimetry
KW - Metabolic indices
KW - Treadmill
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940772438&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940772438&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scispo.2015.03.003
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scispo.2015.03.003
M3 - Article
SN - 0765-1597
VL - 30
SP - 196
EP - 203
JO - Science and Sports
JF - Science and Sports
IS - 4
ER -