Continuity of care

Literature review and implications

Mohammed Alazri, Philip Heywood, Richard D. Neal, Brenda Leese

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Continuity of care is widely regarded as a core value of primary care. The objective of this article is to explore the literature about the concept of continuity of care focusing on factors that influence continuity; advantages and disadvantages of continuity and the effect of continuity on outcomes, hence on the quality of care. Electronic databases and other websites were searched for relevant literature. The results of this review showed that continuity of care is influenced by demographic factors, factors related to patients and healthcare professionals, patient-healthcare professional relationship, inter-professional factors, role of receptionists and organisational factors. Several advantages were found to be associated with most types of continuity in various medical disciplines preventive medicine, general health, maternity and child health, mental and psychosocial health, chronic diseases and costs of care. Various factors influenced different types of continuity. Most types of continuity were associated with good outcomes, hence indirectly affecting the quality of care. Health care professionals and policy makers should be aware of the effect of continuity on quality of care and of the factors that influence continuity if they wish to preserve it as a core value of primary care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)197-206
Number of pages10
JournalSultan Qaboos University Medical Journal
Volume7
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1 2007

Fingerprint

Continuity of Patient Care
Quality of Health Care
Delivery of Health Care
Primary Health Care
Professional-Patient Relations
Professional Role
Preventive Medicine
Cost of Illness
Health Policy
Administrative Personnel
Mental Health
Chronic Disease
Demography
Databases
Health

Keywords

  • Continuity of care
  • General Practitioner
  • Literature review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Continuity of care : Literature review and implications. / Alazri, Mohammed; Heywood, Philip; Neal, Richard D.; Leese, Brenda.

In: Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, Vol. 7, No. 3, 01.12.2007, p. 197-206.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Alazri, M, Heywood, P, Neal, RD & Leese, B 2007, 'Continuity of care: Literature review and implications', Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 197-206.
Alazri, Mohammed ; Heywood, Philip ; Neal, Richard D. ; Leese, Brenda. / Continuity of care : Literature review and implications. In: Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal. 2007 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 197-206.
@article{441934487be945ada4d2d0fe244c40a0,
title = "Continuity of care: Literature review and implications",
abstract = "Continuity of care is widely regarded as a core value of primary care. The objective of this article is to explore the literature about the concept of continuity of care focusing on factors that influence continuity; advantages and disadvantages of continuity and the effect of continuity on outcomes, hence on the quality of care. Electronic databases and other websites were searched for relevant literature. The results of this review showed that continuity of care is influenced by demographic factors, factors related to patients and healthcare professionals, patient-healthcare professional relationship, inter-professional factors, role of receptionists and organisational factors. Several advantages were found to be associated with most types of continuity in various medical disciplines preventive medicine, general health, maternity and child health, mental and psychosocial health, chronic diseases and costs of care. Various factors influenced different types of continuity. Most types of continuity were associated with good outcomes, hence indirectly affecting the quality of care. Health care professionals and policy makers should be aware of the effect of continuity on quality of care and of the factors that influence continuity if they wish to preserve it as a core value of primary care.",
keywords = "Continuity of care, General Practitioner, Literature review",
author = "Mohammed Alazri and Philip Heywood and Neal, {Richard D.} and Brenda Leese",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "197--206",
journal = "Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal",
issn = "2075-051X",
publisher = "Sultan Qaboos University",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Continuity of care

T2 - Literature review and implications

AU - Alazri, Mohammed

AU - Heywood, Philip

AU - Neal, Richard D.

AU - Leese, Brenda

PY - 2007/12/1

Y1 - 2007/12/1

N2 - Continuity of care is widely regarded as a core value of primary care. The objective of this article is to explore the literature about the concept of continuity of care focusing on factors that influence continuity; advantages and disadvantages of continuity and the effect of continuity on outcomes, hence on the quality of care. Electronic databases and other websites were searched for relevant literature. The results of this review showed that continuity of care is influenced by demographic factors, factors related to patients and healthcare professionals, patient-healthcare professional relationship, inter-professional factors, role of receptionists and organisational factors. Several advantages were found to be associated with most types of continuity in various medical disciplines preventive medicine, general health, maternity and child health, mental and psychosocial health, chronic diseases and costs of care. Various factors influenced different types of continuity. Most types of continuity were associated with good outcomes, hence indirectly affecting the quality of care. Health care professionals and policy makers should be aware of the effect of continuity on quality of care and of the factors that influence continuity if they wish to preserve it as a core value of primary care.

AB - Continuity of care is widely regarded as a core value of primary care. The objective of this article is to explore the literature about the concept of continuity of care focusing on factors that influence continuity; advantages and disadvantages of continuity and the effect of continuity on outcomes, hence on the quality of care. Electronic databases and other websites were searched for relevant literature. The results of this review showed that continuity of care is influenced by demographic factors, factors related to patients and healthcare professionals, patient-healthcare professional relationship, inter-professional factors, role of receptionists and organisational factors. Several advantages were found to be associated with most types of continuity in various medical disciplines preventive medicine, general health, maternity and child health, mental and psychosocial health, chronic diseases and costs of care. Various factors influenced different types of continuity. Most types of continuity were associated with good outcomes, hence indirectly affecting the quality of care. Health care professionals and policy makers should be aware of the effect of continuity on quality of care and of the factors that influence continuity if they wish to preserve it as a core value of primary care.

KW - Continuity of care

KW - General Practitioner

KW - Literature review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882807832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882807832&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

VL - 7

SP - 197

EP - 206

JO - Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal

JF - Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal

SN - 2075-051X

IS - 3

ER -