Comparison of ergonomic performance evaluation in mechanized and traditional date stripping processes

Hemanatha P. W. Jayasuriya, Alaa Al-Hinai, Seif Al Adawi, Adel Al Mahdouri

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Al-Mabsili date postharvest processing is done by traditional ways in Oman, blended with traditional and cultural practices. This research aimed to mechanize the date stripping process, developed a prototype with multiple power options and compared ergonomic performance with traditional method. Three power sources were bicycle, exercise machine and electric motor. Ergonomic performance tests were based on standard Cornell discomfort evaluation techniques for whole-body, hands and seating posture. The changes of human physiological parameters, energy spent, and standard NIOSH lifting evaluation were also tested. The results showed increase in heartbeat, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, oxygen consumption and body temperature in all tests. The energy expenditure was highest in traditional method (14 kJ/kg), while bicycle and exercise machine had the higher energy expenditure rates (25.7 and 24.3 kJ/min). The Cornell whole-body postural discomfort was lowest in exercise machine and highest in traditional method. Neck and shoulders were the most affected areas in mechanical methods while hip, buttocks and lower back were most affected in traditional method. In Cornell hands discomfort evaluation, right hand was more affected than the left in all methods and first three fingers and the thumb were most affected. The Cornell seat comfort evaluation showed exercising machine with more comfort (66.7%), bicycle in average (51.9%) and traditional method in poor (9.3%) comfort levels. The average NIOSH lifting index was 0.54 a very satisfactory condition. The stripping was usually done manually and sitting on the ground, 5-10 min/bunch. Ninety percent preferred electric motor as power source followed by bicycle.

Original languageEnglish
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2018
EventASABE 2018 Annual International Meeting - Detroit, United States
Duration: Jul 29 2018Aug 1 2018

Other

OtherASABE 2018 Annual International Meeting
CountryUnited States
CityDetroit
Period7/29/188/1/18

Fingerprint

ergonomics
Bicycles
Ergonomics
Electric motors
Exercise equipment
Blood pressure
electric motors
Seats
exercise
hands
methodology
energy expenditure
Oxygen
buttocks
Processing
seats
Oman
diastolic blood pressure
systolic blood pressure
posture

Keywords

  • Date stripping
  • Discomfort evaluation
  • Ergonomics
  • Lifting index
  • Power source
  • Traditional

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Bioengineering
  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Cite this

P. W. Jayasuriya, H., Al-Hinai, A., Al Adawi, S., & Al Mahdouri, A. (2018). Comparison of ergonomic performance evaluation in mechanized and traditional date stripping processes. Paper presented at ASABE 2018 Annual International Meeting, Detroit, United States. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.201800790

Comparison of ergonomic performance evaluation in mechanized and traditional date stripping processes. / P. W. Jayasuriya, Hemanatha; Al-Hinai, Alaa; Al Adawi, Seif; Al Mahdouri, Adel.

2018. Paper presented at ASABE 2018 Annual International Meeting, Detroit, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

P. W. Jayasuriya, H, Al-Hinai, A, Al Adawi, S & Al Mahdouri, A 2018, 'Comparison of ergonomic performance evaluation in mechanized and traditional date stripping processes' Paper presented at ASABE 2018 Annual International Meeting, Detroit, United States, 7/29/18 - 8/1/18, . https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.201800790
P. W. Jayasuriya H, Al-Hinai A, Al Adawi S, Al Mahdouri A. Comparison of ergonomic performance evaluation in mechanized and traditional date stripping processes. 2018. Paper presented at ASABE 2018 Annual International Meeting, Detroit, United States. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.201800790
P. W. Jayasuriya, Hemanatha ; Al-Hinai, Alaa ; Al Adawi, Seif ; Al Mahdouri, Adel. / Comparison of ergonomic performance evaluation in mechanized and traditional date stripping processes. Paper presented at ASABE 2018 Annual International Meeting, Detroit, United States.
@conference{c1e47b4cfe2648b59ebf1b14227402c8,
title = "Comparison of ergonomic performance evaluation in mechanized and traditional date stripping processes",
abstract = "Al-Mabsili date postharvest processing is done by traditional ways in Oman, blended with traditional and cultural practices. This research aimed to mechanize the date stripping process, developed a prototype with multiple power options and compared ergonomic performance with traditional method. Three power sources were bicycle, exercise machine and electric motor. Ergonomic performance tests were based on standard Cornell discomfort evaluation techniques for whole-body, hands and seating posture. The changes of human physiological parameters, energy spent, and standard NIOSH lifting evaluation were also tested. The results showed increase in heartbeat, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, oxygen consumption and body temperature in all tests. The energy expenditure was highest in traditional method (14 kJ/kg), while bicycle and exercise machine had the higher energy expenditure rates (25.7 and 24.3 kJ/min). The Cornell whole-body postural discomfort was lowest in exercise machine and highest in traditional method. Neck and shoulders were the most affected areas in mechanical methods while hip, buttocks and lower back were most affected in traditional method. In Cornell hands discomfort evaluation, right hand was more affected than the left in all methods and first three fingers and the thumb were most affected. The Cornell seat comfort evaluation showed exercising machine with more comfort (66.7{\%}), bicycle in average (51.9{\%}) and traditional method in poor (9.3{\%}) comfort levels. The average NIOSH lifting index was 0.54 a very satisfactory condition. The stripping was usually done manually and sitting on the ground, 5-10 min/bunch. Ninety percent preferred electric motor as power source followed by bicycle.",
keywords = "Date stripping, Discomfort evaluation, Ergonomics, Lifting index, Power source, Traditional",
author = "{P. W. Jayasuriya}, Hemanatha and Alaa Al-Hinai and {Al Adawi}, Seif and {Al Mahdouri}, Adel",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.13031/aim.201800790",
language = "English",
note = "ASABE 2018 Annual International Meeting ; Conference date: 29-07-2018 Through 01-08-2018",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Comparison of ergonomic performance evaluation in mechanized and traditional date stripping processes

AU - P. W. Jayasuriya, Hemanatha

AU - Al-Hinai, Alaa

AU - Al Adawi, Seif

AU - Al Mahdouri, Adel

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Al-Mabsili date postharvest processing is done by traditional ways in Oman, blended with traditional and cultural practices. This research aimed to mechanize the date stripping process, developed a prototype with multiple power options and compared ergonomic performance with traditional method. Three power sources were bicycle, exercise machine and electric motor. Ergonomic performance tests were based on standard Cornell discomfort evaluation techniques for whole-body, hands and seating posture. The changes of human physiological parameters, energy spent, and standard NIOSH lifting evaluation were also tested. The results showed increase in heartbeat, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, oxygen consumption and body temperature in all tests. The energy expenditure was highest in traditional method (14 kJ/kg), while bicycle and exercise machine had the higher energy expenditure rates (25.7 and 24.3 kJ/min). The Cornell whole-body postural discomfort was lowest in exercise machine and highest in traditional method. Neck and shoulders were the most affected areas in mechanical methods while hip, buttocks and lower back were most affected in traditional method. In Cornell hands discomfort evaluation, right hand was more affected than the left in all methods and first three fingers and the thumb were most affected. The Cornell seat comfort evaluation showed exercising machine with more comfort (66.7%), bicycle in average (51.9%) and traditional method in poor (9.3%) comfort levels. The average NIOSH lifting index was 0.54 a very satisfactory condition. The stripping was usually done manually and sitting on the ground, 5-10 min/bunch. Ninety percent preferred electric motor as power source followed by bicycle.

AB - Al-Mabsili date postharvest processing is done by traditional ways in Oman, blended with traditional and cultural practices. This research aimed to mechanize the date stripping process, developed a prototype with multiple power options and compared ergonomic performance with traditional method. Three power sources were bicycle, exercise machine and electric motor. Ergonomic performance tests were based on standard Cornell discomfort evaluation techniques for whole-body, hands and seating posture. The changes of human physiological parameters, energy spent, and standard NIOSH lifting evaluation were also tested. The results showed increase in heartbeat, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, oxygen consumption and body temperature in all tests. The energy expenditure was highest in traditional method (14 kJ/kg), while bicycle and exercise machine had the higher energy expenditure rates (25.7 and 24.3 kJ/min). The Cornell whole-body postural discomfort was lowest in exercise machine and highest in traditional method. Neck and shoulders were the most affected areas in mechanical methods while hip, buttocks and lower back were most affected in traditional method. In Cornell hands discomfort evaluation, right hand was more affected than the left in all methods and first three fingers and the thumb were most affected. The Cornell seat comfort evaluation showed exercising machine with more comfort (66.7%), bicycle in average (51.9%) and traditional method in poor (9.3%) comfort levels. The average NIOSH lifting index was 0.54 a very satisfactory condition. The stripping was usually done manually and sitting on the ground, 5-10 min/bunch. Ninety percent preferred electric motor as power source followed by bicycle.

KW - Date stripping

KW - Discomfort evaluation

KW - Ergonomics

KW - Lifting index

KW - Power source

KW - Traditional

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054160710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054160710&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.13031/aim.201800790

DO - 10.13031/aim.201800790

M3 - Paper

ER -