TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative Performance Evaluation of the Public Health Surveillance Systems in 6 Gulf Cooperation Countries
T2 - Cross-sectional Study
AU - Albali, Nawaf
AU - Almudarra, Sami
AU - Al-Farsi, Yahya
AU - Alarifi, Abdullah
AU - Al Wahaibi, Adil
AU - Penttinen, Pasi
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by the Gulf Center of Disease Prevention and Control; Gulf Health Council; and the executive arm of the Council of Ministers of Health at Gulf Cooperation Council countries, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Publisher Copyright:
© Nawaf Albali, Sami Almudarra, Yahya Al-Farsi, Abdullah Alarifi, Adil Al Wahaibi, Pasi Penttinen.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background: Evaluating public health surveillance systems is important to ensure that events of public health importance are appropriately monitored. Evaluation studies based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines have been used to appraise surveillance systems globally. Previous evaluation studies undertaken in member countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) were limited to specific illnesses within a single nation. Objective: We aimed to evaluate public health surveillance systems in GCC countries using CDC guidelines and recommend necessary improvements to enhance these systems. Methods: The CDC guidelines were used for evaluating the surveillance systems in GCC countries. A total of 6 representatives from GCC countries were asked to rate 43 indicators across the systems’ level of usefulness, simplicity, flexibility, acceptability, sensitivity, predictive value positive, representativeness, data quality, stability, and timeliness. Descriptive data analysis and univariate linear regression analysis were performed. Results: All surveillance systems in the GCC covered communicable diseases, and approximately two-thirds (4/6, 67%, 95% CI 29.9%-90.3%) of them covered health care–associated infections. The mean global score was 147 (SD 13.27). The United Arab Emirates scored the highest in the global score with a rating of 167 (83.5%, 95% CI 77.7%-88.0%), and Oman obtained the highest scores for usefulness, simplicity, and flexibility. Strong correlations were observed between the global score and the level of usefulness, flexibility, acceptability, representativeness, and timeliness, and a negative correlation was observed between stability and timeliness score. Disease coverage was the most substantial predictor of the GCC surveillance global score. Conclusions: GCC surveillance systems are performing optimally and have shown beneficial outcomes. GCC countries must use the lessons learned from the success of the systems of the United Arab Emirates and Oman. To maintain GCC surveillance systems so that they are viable and adaptable to future potential health risks, measures including centralized information exchange, deployment of emerging technologies, and system architecture reform are necessary.
AB - Background: Evaluating public health surveillance systems is important to ensure that events of public health importance are appropriately monitored. Evaluation studies based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines have been used to appraise surveillance systems globally. Previous evaluation studies undertaken in member countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) were limited to specific illnesses within a single nation. Objective: We aimed to evaluate public health surveillance systems in GCC countries using CDC guidelines and recommend necessary improvements to enhance these systems. Methods: The CDC guidelines were used for evaluating the surveillance systems in GCC countries. A total of 6 representatives from GCC countries were asked to rate 43 indicators across the systems’ level of usefulness, simplicity, flexibility, acceptability, sensitivity, predictive value positive, representativeness, data quality, stability, and timeliness. Descriptive data analysis and univariate linear regression analysis were performed. Results: All surveillance systems in the GCC covered communicable diseases, and approximately two-thirds (4/6, 67%, 95% CI 29.9%-90.3%) of them covered health care–associated infections. The mean global score was 147 (SD 13.27). The United Arab Emirates scored the highest in the global score with a rating of 167 (83.5%, 95% CI 77.7%-88.0%), and Oman obtained the highest scores for usefulness, simplicity, and flexibility. Strong correlations were observed between the global score and the level of usefulness, flexibility, acceptability, representativeness, and timeliness, and a negative correlation was observed between stability and timeliness score. Disease coverage was the most substantial predictor of the GCC surveillance global score. Conclusions: GCC surveillance systems are performing optimally and have shown beneficial outcomes. GCC countries must use the lessons learned from the success of the systems of the United Arab Emirates and Oman. To maintain GCC surveillance systems so that they are viable and adaptable to future potential health risks, measures including centralized information exchange, deployment of emerging technologies, and system architecture reform are necessary.
KW - disease monitoring
KW - emerging technologies
KW - Gulf Cooperation Council
KW - performance evaluation
KW - program evaluation
KW - surveillance systems
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85154037348&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85154037348&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2196/41269
DO - 10.2196/41269
M3 - Article
C2 - 37018033
AN - SCOPUS:85154037348
SN - 2561-326X
VL - 7
JO - JMIR Formative Research
JF - JMIR Formative Research
M1 - e41269
ER -