Community of assessment practice or interests: The case of EAP writing assessment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Setting, disseminating and applying assessment standards are part of university academic programmes of study. Nowadays, assessment is increasingly viewed from a social practice perspective, and so doing entails exploring how the quality of assessment is shaped by interaction and co-participation with different communities of practice. Therefore, based on this perspective, the study reported here aimed to examine the assessment policies and practices of laboratory report writing of first year students in credit-bearing, English for Special Purposes programmes at a university in the Sultanate of Oman. Interviews of programme administrators and the instructors plus institutional and programme documents were examined to investigate these assessment policies and practices. The programme administrators were asked about how they planned the written assessment in their programmes, and the instructors were asked about their experiences of these assessments. The data were then analysed thematically using community of practice framework, namely in relation to (1) a shared repertoire of communal resources, (2) mutual engagement, and (3) a sense of joint enterprise. It was found that instead of community of practice, there were (sub)communities of practices wherein interaction, negotiation and communication amongst members and non-members were punctuated by control, power and autonomy, all working with the aim of narrowing the range between the personal goals of the academic and the communal goals of the institution. The overarching conclusion is that in their assessment practices, the two instructional programmes exhibited varying degrees of community of practice based on the above three attributes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)272-281
Number of pages10
JournalIndonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

community
instructor
Writing Assessment
Oman
program of study
university
first-year student
interaction
credit
Communities of Practice
autonomy
participation
communication
interview
resources
experience
Administrators
Instructor
Interaction

Keywords

  • Assessment standards
  • Community of practice
  • Laboratory report
  • Oman EAP

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Community of assessment practice or interests : The case of EAP writing assessment. / Al-Maamari, Faisal.

In: Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2016, p. 272-281.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5817708aacba488fb1d37b90904255a0,
title = "Community of assessment practice or interests: The case of EAP writing assessment",
abstract = "Setting, disseminating and applying assessment standards are part of university academic programmes of study. Nowadays, assessment is increasingly viewed from a social practice perspective, and so doing entails exploring how the quality of assessment is shaped by interaction and co-participation with different communities of practice. Therefore, based on this perspective, the study reported here aimed to examine the assessment policies and practices of laboratory report writing of first year students in credit-bearing, English for Special Purposes programmes at a university in the Sultanate of Oman. Interviews of programme administrators and the instructors plus institutional and programme documents were examined to investigate these assessment policies and practices. The programme administrators were asked about how they planned the written assessment in their programmes, and the instructors were asked about their experiences of these assessments. The data were then analysed thematically using community of practice framework, namely in relation to (1) a shared repertoire of communal resources, (2) mutual engagement, and (3) a sense of joint enterprise. It was found that instead of community of practice, there were (sub)communities of practices wherein interaction, negotiation and communication amongst members and non-members were punctuated by control, power and autonomy, all working with the aim of narrowing the range between the personal goals of the academic and the communal goals of the institution. The overarching conclusion is that in their assessment practices, the two instructional programmes exhibited varying degrees of community of practice based on the above three attributes.",
keywords = "Assessment standards, Community of practice, Laboratory report, Oman EAP",
author = "Faisal Al-Maamari",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.17509/ijal.v5i2.1351",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "272--281",
journal = "Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics",
issn = "2301-9468",
publisher = "Indonesia University of Education",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Community of assessment practice or interests

T2 - The case of EAP writing assessment

AU - Al-Maamari, Faisal

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Setting, disseminating and applying assessment standards are part of university academic programmes of study. Nowadays, assessment is increasingly viewed from a social practice perspective, and so doing entails exploring how the quality of assessment is shaped by interaction and co-participation with different communities of practice. Therefore, based on this perspective, the study reported here aimed to examine the assessment policies and practices of laboratory report writing of first year students in credit-bearing, English for Special Purposes programmes at a university in the Sultanate of Oman. Interviews of programme administrators and the instructors plus institutional and programme documents were examined to investigate these assessment policies and practices. The programme administrators were asked about how they planned the written assessment in their programmes, and the instructors were asked about their experiences of these assessments. The data were then analysed thematically using community of practice framework, namely in relation to (1) a shared repertoire of communal resources, (2) mutual engagement, and (3) a sense of joint enterprise. It was found that instead of community of practice, there were (sub)communities of practices wherein interaction, negotiation and communication amongst members and non-members were punctuated by control, power and autonomy, all working with the aim of narrowing the range between the personal goals of the academic and the communal goals of the institution. The overarching conclusion is that in their assessment practices, the two instructional programmes exhibited varying degrees of community of practice based on the above three attributes.

AB - Setting, disseminating and applying assessment standards are part of university academic programmes of study. Nowadays, assessment is increasingly viewed from a social practice perspective, and so doing entails exploring how the quality of assessment is shaped by interaction and co-participation with different communities of practice. Therefore, based on this perspective, the study reported here aimed to examine the assessment policies and practices of laboratory report writing of first year students in credit-bearing, English for Special Purposes programmes at a university in the Sultanate of Oman. Interviews of programme administrators and the instructors plus institutional and programme documents were examined to investigate these assessment policies and practices. The programme administrators were asked about how they planned the written assessment in their programmes, and the instructors were asked about their experiences of these assessments. The data were then analysed thematically using community of practice framework, namely in relation to (1) a shared repertoire of communal resources, (2) mutual engagement, and (3) a sense of joint enterprise. It was found that instead of community of practice, there were (sub)communities of practices wherein interaction, negotiation and communication amongst members and non-members were punctuated by control, power and autonomy, all working with the aim of narrowing the range between the personal goals of the academic and the communal goals of the institution. The overarching conclusion is that in their assessment practices, the two instructional programmes exhibited varying degrees of community of practice based on the above three attributes.

KW - Assessment standards

KW - Community of practice

KW - Laboratory report

KW - Oman EAP

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962132771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962132771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.17509/ijal.v5i2.1351

DO - 10.17509/ijal.v5i2.1351

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84962132771

VL - 5

SP - 272

EP - 281

JO - Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics

JF - Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics

SN - 2301-9468

IS - 2

ER -