Causes, effects, benefits, and remedies of change orders on public construction projects in Oman

Ali S. Alnuaimi, Ramzi A. Taha, Mohammed Al Mohsin, Ali S. Al-Harthi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Change orders are usually issued to cover variations in scope of work, material quantities, design errors, and unit rate changes. This paper discusses variations in public construction projects in Oman by investigating causes of variations, studying their effects on the project, identifying the beneficial parties, and suggesting remedies to alleviate related problems. Tasks included an analysis of four actual case studies and conducting a field survey via a questionnaire. It was determined that the client's additional works and modifications to design were the most important factors causing change orders, followed by the nonavailability of construction manuals and procedures. The most important effects of change orders on the project were found to be the schedule delays, disputes, and cost overruns. The contractor was found to be the party most benefiting from the change orders followed by the consultant and then the client. A set of remedial actions were suggested and respondents viewed that the revision of registration of consulting offices would be the most important action followed by establishing standard documents for design procedures and building a national database about soil conditions and services.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)615-622
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
Volume136
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Contractors
Soils
Construction project
Oman
Change orders
Remedies
Costs
Soil
Cost overrun
Schedule delay
Registration
Data base
Questionnaire
Dispute
Consultants
Consulting
Factors

Keywords

  • Case studies
  • Change order
  • Change orders
  • Construction management
  • Cost overrun
  • Costs
  • Delay
  • Delay time
  • Oman
  • Project completion
  • Project management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Strategy and Management
  • Industrial relations
  • Building and Construction

Cite this

Causes, effects, benefits, and remedies of change orders on public construction projects in Oman. / Alnuaimi, Ali S.; Taha, Ramzi A.; Al Mohsin, Mohammed; Al-Harthi, Ali S.

In: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 136, No. 5, 2010, p. 615-622.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7d62894335a142258dd2766f4100dd47,
title = "Causes, effects, benefits, and remedies of change orders on public construction projects in Oman",
abstract = "Change orders are usually issued to cover variations in scope of work, material quantities, design errors, and unit rate changes. This paper discusses variations in public construction projects in Oman by investigating causes of variations, studying their effects on the project, identifying the beneficial parties, and suggesting remedies to alleviate related problems. Tasks included an analysis of four actual case studies and conducting a field survey via a questionnaire. It was determined that the client's additional works and modifications to design were the most important factors causing change orders, followed by the nonavailability of construction manuals and procedures. The most important effects of change orders on the project were found to be the schedule delays, disputes, and cost overruns. The contractor was found to be the party most benefiting from the change orders followed by the consultant and then the client. A set of remedial actions were suggested and respondents viewed that the revision of registration of consulting offices would be the most important action followed by establishing standard documents for design procedures and building a national database about soil conditions and services.",
keywords = "Case studies, Change order, Change orders, Construction management, Cost overrun, Costs, Delay, Delay time, Oman, Project completion, Project management",
author = "Alnuaimi, {Ali S.} and Taha, {Ramzi A.} and {Al Mohsin}, Mohammed and Al-Harthi, {Ali S.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000154",
language = "English",
volume = "136",
pages = "615--622",
journal = "Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE",
issn = "0733-9364",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Causes, effects, benefits, and remedies of change orders on public construction projects in Oman

AU - Alnuaimi, Ali S.

AU - Taha, Ramzi A.

AU - Al Mohsin, Mohammed

AU - Al-Harthi, Ali S.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Change orders are usually issued to cover variations in scope of work, material quantities, design errors, and unit rate changes. This paper discusses variations in public construction projects in Oman by investigating causes of variations, studying their effects on the project, identifying the beneficial parties, and suggesting remedies to alleviate related problems. Tasks included an analysis of four actual case studies and conducting a field survey via a questionnaire. It was determined that the client's additional works and modifications to design were the most important factors causing change orders, followed by the nonavailability of construction manuals and procedures. The most important effects of change orders on the project were found to be the schedule delays, disputes, and cost overruns. The contractor was found to be the party most benefiting from the change orders followed by the consultant and then the client. A set of remedial actions were suggested and respondents viewed that the revision of registration of consulting offices would be the most important action followed by establishing standard documents for design procedures and building a national database about soil conditions and services.

AB - Change orders are usually issued to cover variations in scope of work, material quantities, design errors, and unit rate changes. This paper discusses variations in public construction projects in Oman by investigating causes of variations, studying their effects on the project, identifying the beneficial parties, and suggesting remedies to alleviate related problems. Tasks included an analysis of four actual case studies and conducting a field survey via a questionnaire. It was determined that the client's additional works and modifications to design were the most important factors causing change orders, followed by the nonavailability of construction manuals and procedures. The most important effects of change orders on the project were found to be the schedule delays, disputes, and cost overruns. The contractor was found to be the party most benefiting from the change orders followed by the consultant and then the client. A set of remedial actions were suggested and respondents viewed that the revision of registration of consulting offices would be the most important action followed by establishing standard documents for design procedures and building a national database about soil conditions and services.

KW - Case studies

KW - Change order

KW - Change orders

KW - Construction management

KW - Cost overrun

KW - Costs

KW - Delay

KW - Delay time

KW - Oman

KW - Project completion

KW - Project management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951276981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951276981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000154

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000154

M3 - Article

VL - 136

SP - 615

EP - 622

JO - Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE

JF - Journal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE

SN - 0733-9364

IS - 5

ER -