Cartilage rim augmented fascia tympanoplasty

a more effective composite graft model than temporalis fascia tympanoplasty

A. A. Kolethekkat, Rashid Al-Abri, K. Al Zaabi, N. Al Marhoobi, S. Jose, S. Pillai, J. Mathew

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To validate a newly introduced cartilage rim augmented temporalis fascia tympanoplasty technique by statistically comparing it with the morphological and audiological outcomes of traditional temporalis fascia tympanoplasty. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted on 115 patients who underwent tympanoplasty during 2013 and 2015. Fifty-eight patients underwent temporalis fascia tympanoplasty and 57 underwent cartilage rim augmented fascia tympanoplasty. Results: In the cartilage fascia group, graft healing was achieved in 94.7 per cent of cases; in the temporalis fascia group, the graft take-up rate was 70 per cent. In those with a normal ossicular chain, the post-operative air–bone gap was within 20 dB in 92.6 per cent of cartilage fascia group cases and in 69.7 per cent of the temporalis fascia group cases, which was a statistically significant difference. Among the defective ossicular chain cases, the post-operative air–bone gap was within 20 dB in 76.9 per cent in the cartilage fascia group, as against 57.1 per cent in the temporalis fascia group. Conclusion: Cartilage rim augmented temporalis fascia tympanoplasty has a definite advantage over the temporalis fascia technique in terms of superior graft take up and statistically significant hearing gain in those with normal ossicular mobility.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Laryngology and Otology
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Jun 11 2018

Fingerprint

Tympanoplasty
Fascia
Cartilage
Transplants
Hearing

Keywords

  • Cartilage
  • Fascia
  • Tympanoplasty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Cartilage rim augmented fascia tympanoplasty : a more effective composite graft model than temporalis fascia tympanoplasty. / Kolethekkat, A. A.; Al-Abri, Rashid; Al Zaabi, K.; Al Marhoobi, N.; Jose, S.; Pillai, S.; Mathew, J.

In: Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 11.06.2018, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2bfc67af735c496f940dc8089599b1be,
title = "Cartilage rim augmented fascia tympanoplasty: a more effective composite graft model than temporalis fascia tympanoplasty",
abstract = "Objective: To validate a newly introduced cartilage rim augmented temporalis fascia tympanoplasty technique by statistically comparing it with the morphological and audiological outcomes of traditional temporalis fascia tympanoplasty. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted on 115 patients who underwent tympanoplasty during 2013 and 2015. Fifty-eight patients underwent temporalis fascia tympanoplasty and 57 underwent cartilage rim augmented fascia tympanoplasty. Results: In the cartilage fascia group, graft healing was achieved in 94.7 per cent of cases; in the temporalis fascia group, the graft take-up rate was 70 per cent. In those with a normal ossicular chain, the post-operative air–bone gap was within 20 dB in 92.6 per cent of cartilage fascia group cases and in 69.7 per cent of the temporalis fascia group cases, which was a statistically significant difference. Among the defective ossicular chain cases, the post-operative air–bone gap was within 20 dB in 76.9 per cent in the cartilage fascia group, as against 57.1 per cent in the temporalis fascia group. Conclusion: Cartilage rim augmented temporalis fascia tympanoplasty has a definite advantage over the temporalis fascia technique in terms of superior graft take up and statistically significant hearing gain in those with normal ossicular mobility.",
keywords = "Cartilage, Fascia, Tympanoplasty",
author = "Kolethekkat, {A. A.} and Rashid Al-Abri and {Al Zaabi}, K. and {Al Marhoobi}, N. and S. Jose and S. Pillai and J. Mathew",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1017/S0022215118000762",
language = "English",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Journal of Laryngology and Otology",
issn = "0022-2151",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cartilage rim augmented fascia tympanoplasty

T2 - a more effective composite graft model than temporalis fascia tympanoplasty

AU - Kolethekkat, A. A.

AU - Al-Abri, Rashid

AU - Al Zaabi, K.

AU - Al Marhoobi, N.

AU - Jose, S.

AU - Pillai, S.

AU - Mathew, J.

PY - 2018/6/11

Y1 - 2018/6/11

N2 - Objective: To validate a newly introduced cartilage rim augmented temporalis fascia tympanoplasty technique by statistically comparing it with the morphological and audiological outcomes of traditional temporalis fascia tympanoplasty. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted on 115 patients who underwent tympanoplasty during 2013 and 2015. Fifty-eight patients underwent temporalis fascia tympanoplasty and 57 underwent cartilage rim augmented fascia tympanoplasty. Results: In the cartilage fascia group, graft healing was achieved in 94.7 per cent of cases; in the temporalis fascia group, the graft take-up rate was 70 per cent. In those with a normal ossicular chain, the post-operative air–bone gap was within 20 dB in 92.6 per cent of cartilage fascia group cases and in 69.7 per cent of the temporalis fascia group cases, which was a statistically significant difference. Among the defective ossicular chain cases, the post-operative air–bone gap was within 20 dB in 76.9 per cent in the cartilage fascia group, as against 57.1 per cent in the temporalis fascia group. Conclusion: Cartilage rim augmented temporalis fascia tympanoplasty has a definite advantage over the temporalis fascia technique in terms of superior graft take up and statistically significant hearing gain in those with normal ossicular mobility.

AB - Objective: To validate a newly introduced cartilage rim augmented temporalis fascia tympanoplasty technique by statistically comparing it with the morphological and audiological outcomes of traditional temporalis fascia tympanoplasty. Methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted on 115 patients who underwent tympanoplasty during 2013 and 2015. Fifty-eight patients underwent temporalis fascia tympanoplasty and 57 underwent cartilage rim augmented fascia tympanoplasty. Results: In the cartilage fascia group, graft healing was achieved in 94.7 per cent of cases; in the temporalis fascia group, the graft take-up rate was 70 per cent. In those with a normal ossicular chain, the post-operative air–bone gap was within 20 dB in 92.6 per cent of cartilage fascia group cases and in 69.7 per cent of the temporalis fascia group cases, which was a statistically significant difference. Among the defective ossicular chain cases, the post-operative air–bone gap was within 20 dB in 76.9 per cent in the cartilage fascia group, as against 57.1 per cent in the temporalis fascia group. Conclusion: Cartilage rim augmented temporalis fascia tympanoplasty has a definite advantage over the temporalis fascia technique in terms of superior graft take up and statistically significant hearing gain in those with normal ossicular mobility.

KW - Cartilage

KW - Fascia

KW - Tympanoplasty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048842059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048842059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0022215118000762

DO - 10.1017/S0022215118000762

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Journal of Laryngology and Otology

JF - Journal of Laryngology and Otology

SN - 0022-2151

ER -