Attenuation of bacteria at a riverbank filtration site in rural India

P. Cady, T. B. Boving, B. S. Choudri, A. Cording, K. Patil, V. Reddy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A riverbank filtration (RBF) system was installed in a rural village near the Kali River in southwestern India to evaluate its performance in attenuating total coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli loads in a monsoon-dominated climate in a developing country. A statistical analysis showed that RBF water was of higher microbial quality than other water sources in the study area. Based on the geometric mean of the data from the primary RBF well (MW3), the percent removal compared to the Kali River was 95.1% for total coliforms and 99.2% for E. coli. The maximum percent removals were 99.8% for total coliforms and 99.96% for E. coli. Bacteria concentrations were lower during the dry season than during the monsoon season when contaminants apparently infiltrated into the subsurface. The geometric mean of the annual removal efficiency translates to an approximately 1-log unit removal of E. coli per 26 m (≈75 ft) setback distance from the river. During the 1-year monitoring period, Indian water quality standards for total coliform bacteria were regularly exceeded, whereas E. coli standards were met for 29% of the dry season but only 7% of the monsoon season. The consistent problem of attaining local regulatory limits for bacteria show that, at this study site, (1) RBF needs to be considered a pre-treatment method and, (2) should be combined with conventional disinfection technology. Finally, although the bacteria data confirms that the setback distance of a RBF well from a river is an important factor determining the water quality, local conditions, such as influence of flood-irrigation of nearby rice paddies, presence of freely-roaming cattle and latrines, and outside defecation by residents, must be considered when establishing a RBF system in a monsoon climate in a developing country.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2164-2174
Number of pages11
JournalWater Environment Research
Volume85
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Escherichia coli
Bacteria
bacterium
Rivers
Coliform bacteria
monsoon
coliform bacterium
Developing countries
Water quality
river
Water filtration
dry season
developing world
Disinfection
water quality
defecation
Irrigation
climate
Statistical methods
disinfection

Keywords

  • Bacteria
  • Developing country
  • Escherichia coli
  • India
  • Monsoon climate
  • Riverbank filtration (RBF)
  • Total coliforms
  • Water treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Attenuation of bacteria at a riverbank filtration site in rural India. / Cady, P.; Boving, T. B.; Choudri, B. S.; Cording, A.; Patil, K.; Reddy, V.

In: Water Environment Research, Vol. 85, No. 11, 11.2013, p. 2164-2174.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cady, P. ; Boving, T. B. ; Choudri, B. S. ; Cording, A. ; Patil, K. ; Reddy, V. / Attenuation of bacteria at a riverbank filtration site in rural India. In: Water Environment Research. 2013 ; Vol. 85, No. 11. pp. 2164-2174.
@article{6414ee2d51ad4fc08e15fec0d0bbef3b,
title = "Attenuation of bacteria at a riverbank filtration site in rural India",
abstract = "A riverbank filtration (RBF) system was installed in a rural village near the Kali River in southwestern India to evaluate its performance in attenuating total coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli loads in a monsoon-dominated climate in a developing country. A statistical analysis showed that RBF water was of higher microbial quality than other water sources in the study area. Based on the geometric mean of the data from the primary RBF well (MW3), the percent removal compared to the Kali River was 95.1{\%} for total coliforms and 99.2{\%} for E. coli. The maximum percent removals were 99.8{\%} for total coliforms and 99.96{\%} for E. coli. Bacteria concentrations were lower during the dry season than during the monsoon season when contaminants apparently infiltrated into the subsurface. The geometric mean of the annual removal efficiency translates to an approximately 1-log unit removal of E. coli per 26 m (≈75 ft) setback distance from the river. During the 1-year monitoring period, Indian water quality standards for total coliform bacteria were regularly exceeded, whereas E. coli standards were met for 29{\%} of the dry season but only 7{\%} of the monsoon season. The consistent problem of attaining local regulatory limits for bacteria show that, at this study site, (1) RBF needs to be considered a pre-treatment method and, (2) should be combined with conventional disinfection technology. Finally, although the bacteria data confirms that the setback distance of a RBF well from a river is an important factor determining the water quality, local conditions, such as influence of flood-irrigation of nearby rice paddies, presence of freely-roaming cattle and latrines, and outside defecation by residents, must be considered when establishing a RBF system in a monsoon climate in a developing country.",
keywords = "Bacteria, Developing country, Escherichia coli, India, Monsoon climate, Riverbank filtration (RBF), Total coliforms, Water treatment",
author = "P. Cady and Boving, {T. B.} and Choudri, {B. S.} and A. Cording and K. Patil and V. Reddy",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.2175/106143013X13736496909428",
language = "English",
volume = "85",
pages = "2164--2174",
journal = "Water Environment Research",
issn = "1061-4303",
publisher = "Water Environment Federation",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Attenuation of bacteria at a riverbank filtration site in rural India

AU - Cady, P.

AU - Boving, T. B.

AU - Choudri, B. S.

AU - Cording, A.

AU - Patil, K.

AU - Reddy, V.

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - A riverbank filtration (RBF) system was installed in a rural village near the Kali River in southwestern India to evaluate its performance in attenuating total coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli loads in a monsoon-dominated climate in a developing country. A statistical analysis showed that RBF water was of higher microbial quality than other water sources in the study area. Based on the geometric mean of the data from the primary RBF well (MW3), the percent removal compared to the Kali River was 95.1% for total coliforms and 99.2% for E. coli. The maximum percent removals were 99.8% for total coliforms and 99.96% for E. coli. Bacteria concentrations were lower during the dry season than during the monsoon season when contaminants apparently infiltrated into the subsurface. The geometric mean of the annual removal efficiency translates to an approximately 1-log unit removal of E. coli per 26 m (≈75 ft) setback distance from the river. During the 1-year monitoring period, Indian water quality standards for total coliform bacteria were regularly exceeded, whereas E. coli standards were met for 29% of the dry season but only 7% of the monsoon season. The consistent problem of attaining local regulatory limits for bacteria show that, at this study site, (1) RBF needs to be considered a pre-treatment method and, (2) should be combined with conventional disinfection technology. Finally, although the bacteria data confirms that the setback distance of a RBF well from a river is an important factor determining the water quality, local conditions, such as influence of flood-irrigation of nearby rice paddies, presence of freely-roaming cattle and latrines, and outside defecation by residents, must be considered when establishing a RBF system in a monsoon climate in a developing country.

AB - A riverbank filtration (RBF) system was installed in a rural village near the Kali River in southwestern India to evaluate its performance in attenuating total coliform bacteria and Escherichia coli loads in a monsoon-dominated climate in a developing country. A statistical analysis showed that RBF water was of higher microbial quality than other water sources in the study area. Based on the geometric mean of the data from the primary RBF well (MW3), the percent removal compared to the Kali River was 95.1% for total coliforms and 99.2% for E. coli. The maximum percent removals were 99.8% for total coliforms and 99.96% for E. coli. Bacteria concentrations were lower during the dry season than during the monsoon season when contaminants apparently infiltrated into the subsurface. The geometric mean of the annual removal efficiency translates to an approximately 1-log unit removal of E. coli per 26 m (≈75 ft) setback distance from the river. During the 1-year monitoring period, Indian water quality standards for total coliform bacteria were regularly exceeded, whereas E. coli standards were met for 29% of the dry season but only 7% of the monsoon season. The consistent problem of attaining local regulatory limits for bacteria show that, at this study site, (1) RBF needs to be considered a pre-treatment method and, (2) should be combined with conventional disinfection technology. Finally, although the bacteria data confirms that the setback distance of a RBF well from a river is an important factor determining the water quality, local conditions, such as influence of flood-irrigation of nearby rice paddies, presence of freely-roaming cattle and latrines, and outside defecation by residents, must be considered when establishing a RBF system in a monsoon climate in a developing country.

KW - Bacteria

KW - Developing country

KW - Escherichia coli

KW - India

KW - Monsoon climate

KW - Riverbank filtration (RBF)

KW - Total coliforms

KW - Water treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888585758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888585758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2175/106143013X13736496909428

DO - 10.2175/106143013X13736496909428

M3 - Article

VL - 85

SP - 2164

EP - 2174

JO - Water Environment Research

JF - Water Environment Research

SN - 1061-4303

IS - 11

ER -