Antecedents and consequences of psychological contracts

Does organizational culture really matter?

Orlando C. Richard, Amy McMillan-Capehart, Shahid N. Bhuian, Edward C. Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Exploring the role of psychological contracts, this study proposes that different organizational cultures are associated with relational psychological contracts compared to transactional contracts while both types of contracts serve as mediators. While clan cultures positively impact relational contracts and are negatively associated with transactional contracts, hierarchical cultures have the reverse effect. In addition, psychological contract types mediate the two culture types' relationship to both organizational commitment and employee yearly earnings. In sum, clan cultures relate to more positive organizational outcomes than hierarchical cultures, a finding which as implications for future research and practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)818-825
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Business Research
Volume62
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2009

Fingerprint

Organizational culture
Psychological contract
Mediator
Employees
Relational contracts
Organizational outcomes
Organizational commitment

Keywords

  • Affective commitment
  • Clan culture
  • Hierarchy culture
  • Organizational culture
  • Psychological contracts
  • Relational contracts
  • Transactional contracts
  • Yearly earnings

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Marketing

Cite this

Antecedents and consequences of psychological contracts : Does organizational culture really matter? / Richard, Orlando C.; McMillan-Capehart, Amy; Bhuian, Shahid N.; Taylor, Edward C.

In: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 62, No. 8, 08.2009, p. 818-825.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Richard, Orlando C. ; McMillan-Capehart, Amy ; Bhuian, Shahid N. ; Taylor, Edward C. / Antecedents and consequences of psychological contracts : Does organizational culture really matter?. In: Journal of Business Research. 2009 ; Vol. 62, No. 8. pp. 818-825.
@article{40f3791adaf04304a8c7f573c3cc36f6,
title = "Antecedents and consequences of psychological contracts: Does organizational culture really matter?",
abstract = "Exploring the role of psychological contracts, this study proposes that different organizational cultures are associated with relational psychological contracts compared to transactional contracts while both types of contracts serve as mediators. While clan cultures positively impact relational contracts and are negatively associated with transactional contracts, hierarchical cultures have the reverse effect. In addition, psychological contract types mediate the two culture types' relationship to both organizational commitment and employee yearly earnings. In sum, clan cultures relate to more positive organizational outcomes than hierarchical cultures, a finding which as implications for future research and practice.",
keywords = "Affective commitment, Clan culture, Hierarchy culture, Organizational culture, Psychological contracts, Relational contracts, Transactional contracts, Yearly earnings",
author = "Richard, {Orlando C.} and Amy McMillan-Capehart and Bhuian, {Shahid N.} and Taylor, {Edward C.}",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.04.001",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "818--825",
journal = "Journal of Business Research",
issn = "0148-2963",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Antecedents and consequences of psychological contracts

T2 - Does organizational culture really matter?

AU - Richard, Orlando C.

AU - McMillan-Capehart, Amy

AU - Bhuian, Shahid N.

AU - Taylor, Edward C.

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

N2 - Exploring the role of psychological contracts, this study proposes that different organizational cultures are associated with relational psychological contracts compared to transactional contracts while both types of contracts serve as mediators. While clan cultures positively impact relational contracts and are negatively associated with transactional contracts, hierarchical cultures have the reverse effect. In addition, psychological contract types mediate the two culture types' relationship to both organizational commitment and employee yearly earnings. In sum, clan cultures relate to more positive organizational outcomes than hierarchical cultures, a finding which as implications for future research and practice.

AB - Exploring the role of psychological contracts, this study proposes that different organizational cultures are associated with relational psychological contracts compared to transactional contracts while both types of contracts serve as mediators. While clan cultures positively impact relational contracts and are negatively associated with transactional contracts, hierarchical cultures have the reverse effect. In addition, psychological contract types mediate the two culture types' relationship to both organizational commitment and employee yearly earnings. In sum, clan cultures relate to more positive organizational outcomes than hierarchical cultures, a finding which as implications for future research and practice.

KW - Affective commitment

KW - Clan culture

KW - Hierarchy culture

KW - Organizational culture

KW - Psychological contracts

KW - Relational contracts

KW - Transactional contracts

KW - Yearly earnings

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67349150694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67349150694&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.04.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.04.001

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 818

EP - 825

JO - Journal of Business Research

JF - Journal of Business Research

SN - 0148-2963

IS - 8

ER -