Analysis of argumentation in the discussion sections of published articles in ESP journal: A diachronic corpus-based approach

Saleh Arizavi, Alireza Jalilifar, A. Mehdi Riazi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Argumentation has remained under-researched in studies analyzing academic journal publications despite its importance in academic writing. This paper reports a study in which we investigated stereotypical argumentative trends, lexico-grammatical features, and interactional metadiscourse markers in 354 research article freestanding discussion sections from the journal of ESP over forty years. The field of ESP was chosen because of its maturity, which has given substance to a dynamic ground for arguments. We drew on the pragma-dialectical approach to analyzing argumentations in the corpus. Findings indicated that due to the argumentative nature of the discussion section, certain argumentative trends recurred more often. The analysis of the lexico-grammatical features and metadiscourse markers of the standpoints also showed patterns of variability over time. The study concludes that it is imperative to incorporate relevant facets from various argumentation models to construct a comprehensive argumentation theory and gain deeper insights into argumentation in academic writing.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages28
JournalArgumentation
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 20 2022

Keywords

  • Argument
  • Argumentative trends
  • Discussion section
  • Research article
  • Standpoint
  • The pragma-dialectical approach

Cite this