An audit of hypertension at university health center in Oman

Thuraya Ahmed Al-Shidhani, Kamlesh Bhargava, Syed Rizvi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To audit the documentation of medical care provided to hypertensive patients and to evaluate the management of hypertension in a primary healthcare center, Family Medicine Staff Clinic, Sultan Qaboos University (SQU) in Oman. Methods: An audit of electronic medical records (EMR) was carried out during 2007and 2008 on a representative sample of 150 patients, selected randomly using a simple randomization method. The mean age of the patients was 54.8 +/- 9.9 years. The majority were Omanis; 53.3% were female, 46.7% were male. All patients' records were reviewed for proper recording in a pre designed structured form. Re-auditing was done in 2008. McNemar's test was used to compare data in 2007 with data in 2008. Results: Age, gender, blood pressure recording, renal function tests, and lipid levels were sufficiently recorded (>75%) in the computer system. Histories of pertinent symptoms and smoking history were poorly recorded (<1%). Fifty-five percent of the hypertensive patients were sufficiently controlled (BP<140/90). There were significant differences between 2007 and 2008 with respect to documentation and recording of pertinent symptoms (p<0.001) and renal function tests (p=0.026). Conclusion: Conducting an audit of EMR is essential to evaluate clinical performance and to determine what changes should be made to improve quality of care. There was significant improvement in documentation of pertinent symptoms in the second audit.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)248-252
Number of pages5
JournalOman Medical Journal
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2011

Fingerprint

Oman
Hypertension
Documentation
Health
Electronic Health Records
Medical Audit
Kidney
Quality of Health Care
Computer Systems
Random Allocation
Primary Health Care
Smoking
History
Medicine
Blood Pressure
Lipids

Keywords

  • Blood pressure
  • Cardiovascular diseases
  • Clinical audit
  • Humans
  • Hypertension
  • Medical audit
  • Oman
  • Primary health care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

An audit of hypertension at university health center in Oman. / Al-Shidhani, Thuraya Ahmed; Bhargava, Kamlesh; Rizvi, Syed.

In: Oman Medical Journal, Vol. 26, No. 4, 07.2011, p. 248-252.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Al-Shidhani, Thuraya Ahmed ; Bhargava, Kamlesh ; Rizvi, Syed. / An audit of hypertension at university health center in Oman. In: Oman Medical Journal. 2011 ; Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 248-252.
@article{03e319703ec94cfbbe2e1c93ace8c49e,
title = "An audit of hypertension at university health center in Oman",
abstract = "Objectives: To audit the documentation of medical care provided to hypertensive patients and to evaluate the management of hypertension in a primary healthcare center, Family Medicine Staff Clinic, Sultan Qaboos University (SQU) in Oman. Methods: An audit of electronic medical records (EMR) was carried out during 2007and 2008 on a representative sample of 150 patients, selected randomly using a simple randomization method. The mean age of the patients was 54.8 +/- 9.9 years. The majority were Omanis; 53.3{\%} were female, 46.7{\%} were male. All patients' records were reviewed for proper recording in a pre designed structured form. Re-auditing was done in 2008. McNemar's test was used to compare data in 2007 with data in 2008. Results: Age, gender, blood pressure recording, renal function tests, and lipid levels were sufficiently recorded (>75{\%}) in the computer system. Histories of pertinent symptoms and smoking history were poorly recorded (<1{\%}). Fifty-five percent of the hypertensive patients were sufficiently controlled (BP<140/90). There were significant differences between 2007 and 2008 with respect to documentation and recording of pertinent symptoms (p<0.001) and renal function tests (p=0.026). Conclusion: Conducting an audit of EMR is essential to evaluate clinical performance and to determine what changes should be made to improve quality of care. There was significant improvement in documentation of pertinent symptoms in the second audit.",
keywords = "Blood pressure, Cardiovascular diseases, Clinical audit, Humans, Hypertension, Medical audit, Oman, Primary health care",
author = "Al-Shidhani, {Thuraya Ahmed} and Kamlesh Bhargava and Syed Rizvi",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
doi = "10. 5001/omj.2011.60",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "248--252",
journal = "Oman Medical Journal",
issn = "1999-768X",
publisher = "Oman Medical Specialty Board",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An audit of hypertension at university health center in Oman

AU - Al-Shidhani, Thuraya Ahmed

AU - Bhargava, Kamlesh

AU - Rizvi, Syed

PY - 2011/7

Y1 - 2011/7

N2 - Objectives: To audit the documentation of medical care provided to hypertensive patients and to evaluate the management of hypertension in a primary healthcare center, Family Medicine Staff Clinic, Sultan Qaboos University (SQU) in Oman. Methods: An audit of electronic medical records (EMR) was carried out during 2007and 2008 on a representative sample of 150 patients, selected randomly using a simple randomization method. The mean age of the patients was 54.8 +/- 9.9 years. The majority were Omanis; 53.3% were female, 46.7% were male. All patients' records were reviewed for proper recording in a pre designed structured form. Re-auditing was done in 2008. McNemar's test was used to compare data in 2007 with data in 2008. Results: Age, gender, blood pressure recording, renal function tests, and lipid levels were sufficiently recorded (>75%) in the computer system. Histories of pertinent symptoms and smoking history were poorly recorded (<1%). Fifty-five percent of the hypertensive patients were sufficiently controlled (BP<140/90). There were significant differences between 2007 and 2008 with respect to documentation and recording of pertinent symptoms (p<0.001) and renal function tests (p=0.026). Conclusion: Conducting an audit of EMR is essential to evaluate clinical performance and to determine what changes should be made to improve quality of care. There was significant improvement in documentation of pertinent symptoms in the second audit.

AB - Objectives: To audit the documentation of medical care provided to hypertensive patients and to evaluate the management of hypertension in a primary healthcare center, Family Medicine Staff Clinic, Sultan Qaboos University (SQU) in Oman. Methods: An audit of electronic medical records (EMR) was carried out during 2007and 2008 on a representative sample of 150 patients, selected randomly using a simple randomization method. The mean age of the patients was 54.8 +/- 9.9 years. The majority were Omanis; 53.3% were female, 46.7% were male. All patients' records were reviewed for proper recording in a pre designed structured form. Re-auditing was done in 2008. McNemar's test was used to compare data in 2007 with data in 2008. Results: Age, gender, blood pressure recording, renal function tests, and lipid levels were sufficiently recorded (>75%) in the computer system. Histories of pertinent symptoms and smoking history were poorly recorded (<1%). Fifty-five percent of the hypertensive patients were sufficiently controlled (BP<140/90). There were significant differences between 2007 and 2008 with respect to documentation and recording of pertinent symptoms (p<0.001) and renal function tests (p=0.026). Conclusion: Conducting an audit of EMR is essential to evaluate clinical performance and to determine what changes should be made to improve quality of care. There was significant improvement in documentation of pertinent symptoms in the second audit.

KW - Blood pressure

KW - Cardiovascular diseases

KW - Clinical audit

KW - Humans

KW - Hypertension

KW - Medical audit

KW - Oman

KW - Primary health care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858312231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858312231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10. 5001/omj.2011.60

DO - 10. 5001/omj.2011.60

M3 - Article

C2 - 22043428

AN - SCOPUS:84858312231

VL - 26

SP - 248

EP - 252

JO - Oman Medical Journal

JF - Oman Medical Journal

SN - 1999-768X

IS - 4

ER -