Allred scoring for ER reporting and it's impact in clearly distinguishing ER negative from ER positive breast cancers

Asim Qureshi, Shahid Pervez

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine the scoring of Estrogen Receptor (ER) status in carcinoma breast by Allred method that is essentially bimodal and to compare the results with a conventional scoring system. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, comparative study carried out at Aga Khan University Hospital Section of Histopathology over a period of 18 months i. e. Jan 2005 to June 2006. Anti ER antibody (clone D07) was used for all IHC stains using envision detection system. ER stains of 860 consecutive breast cancer cases were reviewed and rescored by both conventional and Allred method of ER scoring. Results: Comparison of results showed that there was a substantial decrease in weak positive cases from 18% to 5% by rescoring using Allred scoring system compared to conventional scoring. The data was analyzed using chi square test. Conclusion: The sensitivity and specificity of Allred method were calculated; Sensitivity of Allred method was 99. 4% & Specificity of Allred method was 99. 5% whereas sensitivity and specificity of conventional method was 88. 0% and 84% respectively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)350-353
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of the Pakistan Medical Association
Volume60
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - May 2010

Fingerprint

Estrogen Receptors
Breast Neoplasms
Sensitivity and Specificity
Chi-Square Distribution
Coloring Agents
Retrospective Studies
Clone Cells
Antibodies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Allred scoring for ER reporting and it's impact in clearly distinguishing ER negative from ER positive breast cancers. / Qureshi, Asim; Pervez, Shahid.

In: Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, Vol. 60, No. 5, 05.2010, p. 350-353.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{d9db6682be4f496bb449cc01d4259ea0,
title = "Allred scoring for ER reporting and it's impact in clearly distinguishing ER negative from ER positive breast cancers",
abstract = "Objective: To determine the scoring of Estrogen Receptor (ER) status in carcinoma breast by Allred method that is essentially bimodal and to compare the results with a conventional scoring system. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, comparative study carried out at Aga Khan University Hospital Section of Histopathology over a period of 18 months i. e. Jan 2005 to June 2006. Anti ER antibody (clone D07) was used for all IHC stains using envision detection system. ER stains of 860 consecutive breast cancer cases were reviewed and rescored by both conventional and Allred method of ER scoring. Results: Comparison of results showed that there was a substantial decrease in weak positive cases from 18{\%} to 5{\%} by rescoring using Allred scoring system compared to conventional scoring. The data was analyzed using chi square test. Conclusion: The sensitivity and specificity of Allred method were calculated; Sensitivity of Allred method was 99. 4{\%} & Specificity of Allred method was 99. 5{\%} whereas sensitivity and specificity of conventional method was 88. 0{\%} and 84{\%} respectively.",
author = "Asim Qureshi and Shahid Pervez",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "350--353",
journal = "JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association",
issn = "0030-9982",
publisher = "Pakistan Medical Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Allred scoring for ER reporting and it's impact in clearly distinguishing ER negative from ER positive breast cancers

AU - Qureshi, Asim

AU - Pervez, Shahid

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - Objective: To determine the scoring of Estrogen Receptor (ER) status in carcinoma breast by Allred method that is essentially bimodal and to compare the results with a conventional scoring system. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, comparative study carried out at Aga Khan University Hospital Section of Histopathology over a period of 18 months i. e. Jan 2005 to June 2006. Anti ER antibody (clone D07) was used for all IHC stains using envision detection system. ER stains of 860 consecutive breast cancer cases were reviewed and rescored by both conventional and Allred method of ER scoring. Results: Comparison of results showed that there was a substantial decrease in weak positive cases from 18% to 5% by rescoring using Allred scoring system compared to conventional scoring. The data was analyzed using chi square test. Conclusion: The sensitivity and specificity of Allred method were calculated; Sensitivity of Allred method was 99. 4% & Specificity of Allred method was 99. 5% whereas sensitivity and specificity of conventional method was 88. 0% and 84% respectively.

AB - Objective: To determine the scoring of Estrogen Receptor (ER) status in carcinoma breast by Allred method that is essentially bimodal and to compare the results with a conventional scoring system. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, comparative study carried out at Aga Khan University Hospital Section of Histopathology over a period of 18 months i. e. Jan 2005 to June 2006. Anti ER antibody (clone D07) was used for all IHC stains using envision detection system. ER stains of 860 consecutive breast cancer cases were reviewed and rescored by both conventional and Allred method of ER scoring. Results: Comparison of results showed that there was a substantial decrease in weak positive cases from 18% to 5% by rescoring using Allred scoring system compared to conventional scoring. The data was analyzed using chi square test. Conclusion: The sensitivity and specificity of Allred method were calculated; Sensitivity of Allred method was 99. 4% & Specificity of Allred method was 99. 5% whereas sensitivity and specificity of conventional method was 88. 0% and 84% respectively.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951247164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951247164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

C2 - 20527604

AN - SCOPUS:77951247164

VL - 60

SP - 350

EP - 353

JO - JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association

JF - JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association

SN - 0030-9982

IS - 5

ER -