A non-differencing approach to seismic monitoring: Implications for difficult carbonate reservoirs

Abdelmoneam E. Raef, Richard D. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Application of time-lapse seismic data to reservoir monitoring and/or carbon dioxide sequestration programs still faces challenges arising from data repeatability and routine processing practices. Emphasis has therefore been placed on structurally imaging the subsurface rather than preserving seismic wavelet characteristics. Our need for high-resolution seismic data and wavelet-oriented processing required attention to detail coupled with a non-differencing approach to interpretation to successfully monitor a weak time-lapse anomaly in a carbonate reservoir. Near-simultaneous processing flow for baseline and monitor data sets with special attention paid to preserving and enhancing monitor seismic wavelet characteristics and adopting an interpretation approach that would mitigate effects of less-than-perfect cross-equalization enabled us to detect and monitor a very weak (∼10%) CO 2 flood anomaly. Conservative cross-equalization, though desired for preserving weak TL anomalies, renders data differencing unsuitable for most subtle time-lapse anomalies. Higher-resolution data improves the signal's sensitivity to fluid effects on time-lapse seismic and lessens the risk associated with monitoring thin and inhomogeneous carbonate reservoirs. However, high-resolution data is more susceptible to repeatability errors during differencing. Improvement in detectability of change using our non-differencing approach stems from enhanced emphasis on data quality and repeatability, use of areal textures on seismic horizon attribute slices, avoiding the noise amplification from differencing, and textural changes of time-lapse signatures from weak fluid effects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3110-3114
Number of pages5
JournalSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2006

Fingerprint

Carbonates
carbonates
carbonate
Monitoring
preserving
anomalies
wavelet
anomaly
monitors
Processing
Fluids
high resolution
seismic data
Amplification
Carbon dioxide
Textures
fluid
fluids
Imaging techniques
monitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geophysics
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Cite this

A non-differencing approach to seismic monitoring : Implications for difficult carbonate reservoirs. / Raef, Abdelmoneam E.; Miller, Richard D.

In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.2006, p. 3110-3114.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e1a8a1f1621c4ea8bddcd0df5c26af39,
title = "A non-differencing approach to seismic monitoring: Implications for difficult carbonate reservoirs",
abstract = "Application of time-lapse seismic data to reservoir monitoring and/or carbon dioxide sequestration programs still faces challenges arising from data repeatability and routine processing practices. Emphasis has therefore been placed on structurally imaging the subsurface rather than preserving seismic wavelet characteristics. Our need for high-resolution seismic data and wavelet-oriented processing required attention to detail coupled with a non-differencing approach to interpretation to successfully monitor a weak time-lapse anomaly in a carbonate reservoir. Near-simultaneous processing flow for baseline and monitor data sets with special attention paid to preserving and enhancing monitor seismic wavelet characteristics and adopting an interpretation approach that would mitigate effects of less-than-perfect cross-equalization enabled us to detect and monitor a very weak (∼10{\%}) CO 2 flood anomaly. Conservative cross-equalization, though desired for preserving weak TL anomalies, renders data differencing unsuitable for most subtle time-lapse anomalies. Higher-resolution data improves the signal's sensitivity to fluid effects on time-lapse seismic and lessens the risk associated with monitoring thin and inhomogeneous carbonate reservoirs. However, high-resolution data is more susceptible to repeatability errors during differencing. Improvement in detectability of change using our non-differencing approach stems from enhanced emphasis on data quality and repeatability, use of areal textures on seismic horizon attribute slices, avoiding the noise amplification from differencing, and textural changes of time-lapse signatures from weak fluid effects.",
author = "Raef, {Abdelmoneam E.} and Miller, {Richard D.}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1190/1.2370174",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "3110--3114",
journal = "SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts",
issn = "1052-3812",
publisher = "Society of Exploration Geophysicists",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A non-differencing approach to seismic monitoring

T2 - Implications for difficult carbonate reservoirs

AU - Raef, Abdelmoneam E.

AU - Miller, Richard D.

PY - 2006/1

Y1 - 2006/1

N2 - Application of time-lapse seismic data to reservoir monitoring and/or carbon dioxide sequestration programs still faces challenges arising from data repeatability and routine processing practices. Emphasis has therefore been placed on structurally imaging the subsurface rather than preserving seismic wavelet characteristics. Our need for high-resolution seismic data and wavelet-oriented processing required attention to detail coupled with a non-differencing approach to interpretation to successfully monitor a weak time-lapse anomaly in a carbonate reservoir. Near-simultaneous processing flow for baseline and monitor data sets with special attention paid to preserving and enhancing monitor seismic wavelet characteristics and adopting an interpretation approach that would mitigate effects of less-than-perfect cross-equalization enabled us to detect and monitor a very weak (∼10%) CO 2 flood anomaly. Conservative cross-equalization, though desired for preserving weak TL anomalies, renders data differencing unsuitable for most subtle time-lapse anomalies. Higher-resolution data improves the signal's sensitivity to fluid effects on time-lapse seismic and lessens the risk associated with monitoring thin and inhomogeneous carbonate reservoirs. However, high-resolution data is more susceptible to repeatability errors during differencing. Improvement in detectability of change using our non-differencing approach stems from enhanced emphasis on data quality and repeatability, use of areal textures on seismic horizon attribute slices, avoiding the noise amplification from differencing, and textural changes of time-lapse signatures from weak fluid effects.

AB - Application of time-lapse seismic data to reservoir monitoring and/or carbon dioxide sequestration programs still faces challenges arising from data repeatability and routine processing practices. Emphasis has therefore been placed on structurally imaging the subsurface rather than preserving seismic wavelet characteristics. Our need for high-resolution seismic data and wavelet-oriented processing required attention to detail coupled with a non-differencing approach to interpretation to successfully monitor a weak time-lapse anomaly in a carbonate reservoir. Near-simultaneous processing flow for baseline and monitor data sets with special attention paid to preserving and enhancing monitor seismic wavelet characteristics and adopting an interpretation approach that would mitigate effects of less-than-perfect cross-equalization enabled us to detect and monitor a very weak (∼10%) CO 2 flood anomaly. Conservative cross-equalization, though desired for preserving weak TL anomalies, renders data differencing unsuitable for most subtle time-lapse anomalies. Higher-resolution data improves the signal's sensitivity to fluid effects on time-lapse seismic and lessens the risk associated with monitoring thin and inhomogeneous carbonate reservoirs. However, high-resolution data is more susceptible to repeatability errors during differencing. Improvement in detectability of change using our non-differencing approach stems from enhanced emphasis on data quality and repeatability, use of areal textures on seismic horizon attribute slices, avoiding the noise amplification from differencing, and textural changes of time-lapse signatures from weak fluid effects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845412345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845412345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1190/1.2370174

DO - 10.1190/1.2370174

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33845412345

VL - 25

SP - 3110

EP - 3114

JO - SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts

JF - SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts

SN - 1052-3812

IS - 1

ER -