Abstract
Abstract
The study idea based on the existence of the objections, imaginary objections or suspicions around some linguistic issue, in the book "Attanbeeh ala Sharh Mushkilat Al-Hamassa", made by Ibn Jinni, trying to eject one or the other using his linguistic worth in the framework of solving the problems in the book morphologically, syntactically and semantically. Therefore, it is an approach selected by the scholar in his argumentation to illustrate an idea or weighting an opinion or assumption. This argumentation, weighting or assumption, which assumed by the grammarian in his ruling or explaining can be a new one that has not been said by any of the grammarians or linguists, or has been said by someone and there is an objection to what is illusory or suspicious about the issue.
The study aims to follow this objection in order to contribute to clarify Ibn Jinni's thought through morphology, syntax and semantic, following the descriptive approach and analysis.
The study concluded many results, of which, they were arguments about eject the objections to the opinions of grammarians and linguists, or, the opinions of illusionist, or dissidents - as he called them - or to eject their opinions. He had an approach in this eject, characterized by denial of some opinion, to clarify the error, described as weakness, lacks to the evidence or that it is denied on one hand, or from the side or from of the point of weakening the meaning or corrupting it.
The study idea based on the existence of the objections, imaginary objections or suspicions around some linguistic issue, in the book "Attanbeeh ala Sharh Mushkilat Al-Hamassa", made by Ibn Jinni, trying to eject one or the other using his linguistic worth in the framework of solving the problems in the book morphologically, syntactically and semantically. Therefore, it is an approach selected by the scholar in his argumentation to illustrate an idea or weighting an opinion or assumption. This argumentation, weighting or assumption, which assumed by the grammarian in his ruling or explaining can be a new one that has not been said by any of the grammarians or linguists, or has been said by someone and there is an objection to what is illusory or suspicious about the issue.
The study aims to follow this objection in order to contribute to clarify Ibn Jinni's thought through morphology, syntax and semantic, following the descriptive approach and analysis.
The study concluded many results, of which, they were arguments about eject the objections to the opinions of grammarians and linguists, or, the opinions of illusionist, or dissidents - as he called them - or to eject their opinions. He had an approach in this eject, characterized by denial of some opinion, to clarify the error, described as weakness, lacks to the evidence or that it is denied on one hand, or from the side or from of the point of weakening the meaning or corrupting it.
Translated title of the contribution | Ibn Jinni's Efforts in Ejecting the Imaginary Objection or Suspicions linguistically hover in his Book: Attanbeeh ala Sharh Mushkilat Al-Hamassa |
---|---|
Original language | Arabic |
Article number | 1 |
Pages (from-to) | 10-142 |
Number of pages | 132 |
Journal | حوليات الآداب والعلوم الاجتماععية |
Volume | 571 |
Issue number | 41 |
Publication status | Published - Jun 1 2021 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics