TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of phenotypic personality traits as dimensions of decision-making styles
AU - Gulseven, Osman
AU - Mostert, Jacques
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Gulseven and Mostert.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Background: Each individual has unique personality traits which affect decision-making process. Those traits are defined as cautiousness, openness to experience, decision difficulty, agency, emotion neutrality, goal orientation, intuitive awareness, plan orientation, pro-activity, and rationality. Objective: The study aimed to show how established personality traits as dimensions of decision-making can be used to classify four distinct decision-making styles. The personality styles are defined as avoidant, designer, flexible, and auditor styles. Methods: A global survey was conducted to gather information on individual decision-making styles. Quantitative methods, such as tabular analysis, mean score equivalency test, correlation analysis, discriminant analysis and chi-square test for association have been used. Results: We found that there are significant gender differences in personality styles. This is partially due to the differences in emotion-neutrality scores among men and women. Female respondents are more emotional, a finding that is common in educational workers. Conclusion: The results reinforce that gender differences in emotions exist. For a socially interactive occupation such as education, being emotional might lead to better communication.
AB - Background: Each individual has unique personality traits which affect decision-making process. Those traits are defined as cautiousness, openness to experience, decision difficulty, agency, emotion neutrality, goal orientation, intuitive awareness, plan orientation, pro-activity, and rationality. Objective: The study aimed to show how established personality traits as dimensions of decision-making can be used to classify four distinct decision-making styles. The personality styles are defined as avoidant, designer, flexible, and auditor styles. Methods: A global survey was conducted to gather information on individual decision-making styles. Quantitative methods, such as tabular analysis, mean score equivalency test, correlation analysis, discriminant analysis and chi-square test for association have been used. Results: We found that there are significant gender differences in personality styles. This is partially due to the differences in emotion-neutrality scores among men and women. Female respondents are more emotional, a finding that is common in educational workers. Conclusion: The results reinforce that gender differences in emotions exist. For a socially interactive occupation such as education, being emotional might lead to better communication.
KW - Decision-making
KW - Diversity
KW - Emotions
KW - Gender studies
KW - Personality traits
KW - Tabular analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065863973&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065863973&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2174/1874350101912010084
DO - 10.2174/1874350101912010084
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85065863973
SN - 1874-3501
VL - 12
SP - 84
EP - 95
JO - Open Psychology Journal
JF - Open Psychology Journal
IS - 1
ER -