TY - JOUR
T1 - Selecting the Right Crops for Cropping Pattern Optimization Based on Social Choice and Fallback Bargaining Methods Considering Stakeholders’ Views
AU - Honar, Tooraj
AU - Ghazali, Mahboubeh
AU - Nikoo, Mohammad Reza
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Shiraz University.
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Selection of a cropping pattern that is suitable for available water resources in each region is one of the important strategies for tackling drought and increasing water productivity. So far, many studies have been conducted to optimize cropping patterns, but their prime focus has been on optimizing the cultivation area of each crop. However, considering stakeholders’ interests and criteria in the region causes an increase in the acceptability and implementation of the modeling results. Crop selection that conforms to regional stakeholders’ criteria for cropping pattern optimization is a parameter that has been less considered in the past. The present study proposes a methodology based on four multi-criteria decision-making models including AHP, TOPSIS, PROMETHEE and ELECTRE combined with Borda count, MVR, Condorcet social methods as well as fallback bargaining method in order to select proper crops for cropping pattern optimization. The suggested methodology was used in irrigation and drainage network of Doroudzan Dam in Fars province, Iran, under normal, wet and arid climatic conditions. The results showed, based on the three decision-making methods, wheat has been introduced as the first priority of the farmers in the study area in most of the regions and under different climatic conditions. Applying the fallback bargaining method to reach an agreement and considering the depth of the calculated agreement for each management region under each of the climatic conditions, the results obtained by the fallback bargaining method often maximize the negotiators’ satisfaction.
AB - Selection of a cropping pattern that is suitable for available water resources in each region is one of the important strategies for tackling drought and increasing water productivity. So far, many studies have been conducted to optimize cropping patterns, but their prime focus has been on optimizing the cultivation area of each crop. However, considering stakeholders’ interests and criteria in the region causes an increase in the acceptability and implementation of the modeling results. Crop selection that conforms to regional stakeholders’ criteria for cropping pattern optimization is a parameter that has been less considered in the past. The present study proposes a methodology based on four multi-criteria decision-making models including AHP, TOPSIS, PROMETHEE and ELECTRE combined with Borda count, MVR, Condorcet social methods as well as fallback bargaining method in order to select proper crops for cropping pattern optimization. The suggested methodology was used in irrigation and drainage network of Doroudzan Dam in Fars province, Iran, under normal, wet and arid climatic conditions. The results showed, based on the three decision-making methods, wheat has been introduced as the first priority of the farmers in the study area in most of the regions and under different climatic conditions. Applying the fallback bargaining method to reach an agreement and considering the depth of the calculated agreement for each management region under each of the climatic conditions, the results obtained by the fallback bargaining method often maximize the negotiators’ satisfaction.
KW - Crop selection
KW - Cropping pattern optimization
KW - Decision-making methods
KW - Fallback bargaining
KW - Social choice methods
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091163048&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85091163048&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40996-020-00446-1
DO - 10.1007/s40996-020-00446-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85091163048
SN - 2228-6160
VL - 45
SP - 1077
EP - 1088
JO - Iranian Journal of Science and Technology - Transactions of Civil Engineering
JF - Iranian Journal of Science and Technology - Transactions of Civil Engineering
IS - 2
ER -