TY - JOUR
T1 - RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS of PATIENT RADIATION DOSES in DIGITAL CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY and INTERVENTIONS
AU - Al-Jabri, Amna J.
AU - Alzimami, Khalid
AU - Alsafi, K.
AU - Alaamer, Abdulaziz S.
AU - Al-Rajhi, M. A.
AU - Suliman, I. I.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/6/1
Y1 - 2019/6/1
N2 - This study sought to assess patient and operator eye lens doses in diagnostic coronary angiography (DCA) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in a University hospital in Oman. Kerma area product (PkA), cumulative air kerma (CAK) and fluoroscopic time (FT) were retrospectively recorded from the DICOM header for 264 patients. The median (interquartile range) of FT, PKA and CAK were: 5.3 min (2.6-10.5), 60.9 Gy cm2 (41.3-91.4) and 0.86 Gy (0.61-1.29), respectively, for DCA procedures, and they were 20.2 min (13.3-30.1), 174.0 Gy cm2 (113.7-253.3) and 2.6 Gy (1.8-3.9), respectively, for PCI procedures. The results revealed wide variability in patient doses among individual patients. Monitoring and recording patient dose data can be valuable for quality assurance and patient safety purposes. Feedback to the operator may help optimize radiation doses to patients and prompt further action, as needed.
AB - This study sought to assess patient and operator eye lens doses in diagnostic coronary angiography (DCA) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in a University hospital in Oman. Kerma area product (PkA), cumulative air kerma (CAK) and fluoroscopic time (FT) were retrospectively recorded from the DICOM header for 264 patients. The median (interquartile range) of FT, PKA and CAK were: 5.3 min (2.6-10.5), 60.9 Gy cm2 (41.3-91.4) and 0.86 Gy (0.61-1.29), respectively, for DCA procedures, and they were 20.2 min (13.3-30.1), 174.0 Gy cm2 (113.7-253.3) and 2.6 Gy (1.8-3.9), respectively, for PCI procedures. The results revealed wide variability in patient doses among individual patients. Monitoring and recording patient dose data can be valuable for quality assurance and patient safety purposes. Feedback to the operator may help optimize radiation doses to patients and prompt further action, as needed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064194749&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064194749&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/rpd/ncy168
DO - 10.1093/rpd/ncy168
M3 - Article
C2 - 30260437
AN - SCOPUS:85064194749
SN - 0144-8420
VL - 183
SP - 497
EP - 502
JO - Radiation Protection Dosimetry
JF - Radiation Protection Dosimetry
IS - 4
ER -