TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of mutations in epigenetic modifiers in acute myeloid leukemia
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Al-Bulushi, Fatma
AU - Al-Riyami, Rahma
AU - Al-Housni, Zainab
AU - Al-Abri, Bushra
AU - Al-Khabori, Murtadha
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Al-Bulushi, Al-Riyami, Al-Housni, Al-Abri and Al-Khabori.
PY - 2022/11/28
Y1 - 2022/11/28
N2 - This is a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the prognostic significance of epigenetic mutations on the overall survival (OS) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). We searched for studies evaluating epigenetic mutations in AML (up to November 2018) in PubMed, Trip database and Cochrane library. Hazard ratio (HR) of outcomes were extracted, and random-effects model was used to pool the results. A total of 10,002 citations were retrieved from the search strategy; 42 articles were identified for the meta-analysis (ASXL1 = 7, TET2 = 8, DNMT3A = 12, IDH =15), with fair to good-quality studies. The pooled HR was 1.88 (95% CI: 1.49−2.36) for ASXL1 mutation, 1.39 (95% CI: 1.18−1.63) for TET2 mutation, 1.35 (95% CI 1.16-1.56) for DNMT3a and 1.54 (95% CI: 1.15-2.06) for IDH mutation. However, there was a substantial heterogeneity in the DNMT3a and IDH studies. In conclusion epigenetic mutations in ASXL1, TET2, DNMT3a and IDH adversely impact OS in patients with AML albeit with considerable heterogeneity and possibly publication bias. Further studies are required to address these limitations.
AB - This is a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the prognostic significance of epigenetic mutations on the overall survival (OS) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). We searched for studies evaluating epigenetic mutations in AML (up to November 2018) in PubMed, Trip database and Cochrane library. Hazard ratio (HR) of outcomes were extracted, and random-effects model was used to pool the results. A total of 10,002 citations were retrieved from the search strategy; 42 articles were identified for the meta-analysis (ASXL1 = 7, TET2 = 8, DNMT3A = 12, IDH =15), with fair to good-quality studies. The pooled HR was 1.88 (95% CI: 1.49−2.36) for ASXL1 mutation, 1.39 (95% CI: 1.18−1.63) for TET2 mutation, 1.35 (95% CI 1.16-1.56) for DNMT3a and 1.54 (95% CI: 1.15-2.06) for IDH mutation. However, there was a substantial heterogeneity in the DNMT3a and IDH studies. In conclusion epigenetic mutations in ASXL1, TET2, DNMT3a and IDH adversely impact OS in patients with AML albeit with considerable heterogeneity and possibly publication bias. Further studies are required to address these limitations.
KW - AML
KW - ASXL1
KW - Dnmt3a
KW - epigenetics
KW - IDH
KW - mutation
KW - review – systematic
KW - TET2
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144053667&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85144053667&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fonc.2022.967657
DO - 10.3389/fonc.2022.967657
M3 - Review article
C2 - 36518313
AN - SCOPUS:85144053667
SN - 2234-943X
VL - 12
JO - Frontiers in Oncology
JF - Frontiers in Oncology
M1 - 967657
ER -