TY - JOUR
T1 - Accuracy of force measurement via motion analysis system in artistic gymnastics
AU - Mkaouer, Bessem
AU - Chaabene, Helmi
AU - Amara, Samiha
AU - Hammoudi-Nassib, Sarra
AU - Negra, Yassine
AU - Jemni, Monèm
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Edizioni Minerva Medica.
PY - 2018/12
Y1 - 2018/12
N2 - BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to validate the accuracy of ground-reaction force measurement using inverse body dynamic analysis via video motion analysis system versus portable force-plate direct measurement system (i.e., gold standard model). METHODS: Six elite-level male gymnasts (age =23.70±1.94 years; height =1.66±0.06 m; body mass =58.67±8.24 kg) participated in this study. The concurrent kinematic and dynamic analysis of the ground-reaction forces during snap-down take-off to back somersault were performed in the acrobatic series (i.e., round-off flic-flac back somersault). RESULTS: The finding of the present study showed very good relative and absolute reliability of the motion analysis system outcomes (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] =0.953, typical error of measurement [TEM] =85.31 N, and TEM(%) =1.17%). Further, the motion analysis device demonstrated good ability to detect small and meaningful performance change (TEM< smallest worthwhile change [SWC]). No statistically significant differences were observed when comparing the ground-reaction force outcome between repetitions and devices (P>0.05; d=0.048). Additionally, results showed a nearly perfect association between the two methods (r=0.965 and R2=93%). The mean (bias)±95% limits of agreement between the two measurement devices was 341.0±508.8 N. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, inverse body dynamic analysis could be a good alternative to force-plate device for coaches to evaluate ground-reaction force in male artistic gymnastics.
AB - BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to validate the accuracy of ground-reaction force measurement using inverse body dynamic analysis via video motion analysis system versus portable force-plate direct measurement system (i.e., gold standard model). METHODS: Six elite-level male gymnasts (age =23.70±1.94 years; height =1.66±0.06 m; body mass =58.67±8.24 kg) participated in this study. The concurrent kinematic and dynamic analysis of the ground-reaction forces during snap-down take-off to back somersault were performed in the acrobatic series (i.e., round-off flic-flac back somersault). RESULTS: The finding of the present study showed very good relative and absolute reliability of the motion analysis system outcomes (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] =0.953, typical error of measurement [TEM] =85.31 N, and TEM(%) =1.17%). Further, the motion analysis device demonstrated good ability to detect small and meaningful performance change (TEM< smallest worthwhile change [SWC]). No statistically significant differences were observed when comparing the ground-reaction force outcome between repetitions and devices (P>0.05; d=0.048). Additionally, results showed a nearly perfect association between the two methods (r=0.965 and R2=93%). The mean (bias)±95% limits of agreement between the two measurement devices was 341.0±508.8 N. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, inverse body dynamic analysis could be a good alternative to force-plate device for coaches to evaluate ground-reaction force in male artistic gymnastics.
KW - Exercise test
KW - Gymnastics
KW - Kinetics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058854261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058854261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.23736/S0025-7826.18.03226-X
DO - 10.23736/S0025-7826.18.03226-X
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85058854261
SN - 0025-7826
VL - 71
SP - 521
EP - 532
JO - Medicina dello Sport
JF - Medicina dello Sport
IS - 4
ER -